> height - 5'9> bideltoid - 17"> biacromial - 15"> chest breadth - 11.5"> underbust - 32"> waist breadth - 9.5"> waist circ. - 27"> bicristal - 12.5"> hip breadth - 14.5"> hip circ. - 42"how bad is it? should i kms?
>>41677120we can only tell with a pic, measurements mean shit
>>41677120waist hip breadth must be measured wrongand if you are measuring that wrong then i question the others too
>>41677265they're not i measured multiple timeswhy do you think they're wrong?
>>41677325only because its such an outlier
Based on these measurements, the person is overwhelmingly more likely to be female.Here is a breakdown of why:1. The Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)This is the most definitive indicator in the data provided.Waist Circumference: 27"Hip Circumference: 42"Calculation: 27 (waist) รท 42 (hip) = 0.64 WHRA WHR of 0.64 is a very low ratio, indicating a very small waist in comparison to very large hips. This "gynoid" (or pear/hourglass) body shape is a classic female characteristic, driven by estrogen, which promotes fat storage in the hips, thighs, and buttocks. A typical male ("android") WHR is 0.90 or higher.2. Contradictory (But Explainable) DataSome of the measurements might appear more male-typical at first glance, but they are less conclusive than the WHR.Height (5'9"): This is the average height for a US male, but it is also a common height for a tall female.Shoulders (15" Biacromial / 17" Bideltoid): These are broad shoulders, which are more common in males. However, a 15-inch biacromial width, while wide, is not impossible for a 5'9" female.ConclusionWhile the height and shoulder width are on the larger side for a female, the 0.64 waist-to-hip ratio and the 42-inch hip circumference are extremely strong biological indicators of a female. A male with a 27-inch waist and 42-inch hips is biologically rare.Therefore, the data describes a tall, broad-shouldered female with a very pronounced hourglass figure.
>>41677352i wrapped a tape measure evenly around the widest part of my hips, snug but not tight or loosealso for breadth i have callipers and i took the width measurement at the same place, widest part of my hips
>>41677390ya i think that sample data is bad actually, sorry
>>41677398i do have an abnormally small waist especially for my bfp
>>41677377so my hips are good but my upper body is moidi thought so
