Human bodies are inherently sexual. Anything related to sexual dimorphism is inherently sexual. Any socially constructed aspect of sexual dimorphism is by its nature sexual.
>>41686470blanchard is so funny this guy was just saying shit
>>41686470yes, well even if this is true, you're still gynephilic, which indicates male-typical neurology. a man without AGP can imagine he has breasts, but it isnt about HIM having breasts, hes just finding a female fertility signal he's seeing in his head arousing that happens to be on him. it's still completely external, unlike the autogynephile, who is dysphoric.
>>41686574And of the lesbian female, Dr. Anon?
>>41686579well if they actually exist, if they aren't just meta attracted autoandrophiles, would still just be straight men in woman's bodies, if the idea of being trans because you have a cross gendered brain is important to you.
>>41686587ok but what if the girl wants to kiss other girls
>>41686587and gay men?
>>41686593i think that would make the girl feel very manly :)
>>41686602some women don't feel manly when they kiss other women?
>>41686477welcome to a large portion of the field of psychology
>>41686601it's generally much more possible to produce a gay man than it is to produce an actual lesbian, due to the nature of how the brain is first defeminized and then masculinized later on in the womb. lesbian brains can never effectively defeminize without ending up with male genitalia due to hormonal timings. gay males still have male brains that are defeminized, their brains just weren't masculinized normally. it's more likely that any lesbian claiming to be exclusively into woman is actually bisexual, with their androphilia either inverted or repressed due to trauma.
>>41686605and most people aren't going to be perfectly aware of the origin of their feelings, either. there's plenty of "bisexual" men that believe they are bisexual because they are bottoms for men, despite not actually being attracted to men sexually or romantically. autosexuality is complicated and generally manifests as behaviors that end up in different categories, without the true origin being questioned. so yes, of course an autoandrophilic woman will feel very good kissing a woman.
>>41686630you are talking out your ass
>>41686671im not. lol. male genitalia forms through DHT exposure, which comes from testosterone. if you are born with female genitalia, you were not exposed to enough of it to develop any truly male typical features. and the development of male genitalia exposes the brain to enough androgens to defeminize, but not necessarily masculinize. it is, known, however that woman are overwhelmingly more likely to be bisexual, as shown in fmri studies, so any lesbian is likely bisexual, not lesbian. this is also supported by gay males not having completely female typical brains and why woman demonstrate a bisexual response, physiologically and neurologically.
>>41686477cope
>>41686574how do you explain meta-attraction then? I dont get aroused by image of me having female body. I just wanna have seks with man. Preferably with me having vagina but I like anal too.
>>41688789same, idk, we're so straight we like guys ig
>>41686587>if they actually exist
>>41686587>well if they actually existThis fucking board I swear
>>41686470Narrow view. They have a sexual aspect sure, but that isn't all there is to them. Tits have a sexual aspect, yet they have a function beyond that. Which is true for most things, even your genitals are built both for sex and to deposit waste.
>>41689090Kinda, but regardless they still have a sexual aspect to them, even if it is not their only function.
>>41686574being gynephilic is female-typical actually, it's being exclusively androphilic that is a 100% male trait.
HSTS is real - gay men really do pretend to be women to escape persecution and social isolation.
>>41686574>>41686587meta-attraction is such a cope>"erhm, you're AGP!!">"but I like men">oh fuck uh,,,what the fuck do i say?? "u-uhm,,,, well you don't ACTUALLY like men, you like the idea of liking men because you like the idea of liking men making you female, as a fetish!!!"
>>41690283comp het exists
>>41690428Metaattraction + comphet BRUTAL combination (this was me some years ago)
>>41690283you sound like a man
>>41693597thats becasue I am one and IWNBAWwhats the issue here?Not even blanchard asserts that HSTS are "really women"
>>41690428>>41691526Post-Hoc justification for liking men despite being "agp" which is also a post-hoc justification
>>41686470AGP is 100% real and Blanchard accurately categorized white fake trans larping sickos. If AGP doesn't exist then you don't have it, and you have no reason to try to attack it.
>>41693662>AGP is 100% real and Blanchard accurately categorized white fake trans larping sickos. If AGP doesn't exist then you don't have it, and you have no reason to try to attack it./board
>>41686470>As Sartre and Merleau-Ponty have observed, the proposition "sexuality is coextensive with existence" can be understood in two very different ways; it could mean that every avatar of the existent has a sexual signification, or that every sexual phenomenon has an existential meaning: these two affirmations can be reconciled; but often one tends to slip from one to the other. Besides, as soon as "sexual" and "genital" are distinguished, the notion of sexuality becomes blurred. "The sexual for Freud is the intrinsic aptitude to trigger the genital," says Dalbiez. But nothing is murkier than the notion of "aptitude," or of possibility: only reality can indubitably prove possibility. Not being a philosopher, Freud refused to justify his system philosophically; his disciples maintain that he thus eludes any attacks of a metaphysical sort. There are, however, metaphysical postulates behind all of his affirmations: to use his language is to adopt a philosophy. It is this very confusion that, while making criticism awkward, demands it.-- Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex trans. Borde and Malovany-Chevallier vol. 1 pt. 1 ch. 2
>>41689773I'm attracted to more feminine men, which is probably the most taboo thing on this board
>>41696417it isnt taboo. its okay to be in love with femininity.
>>41696459Not really. Because I always still would prefer to be in a more submissive role, or the one being penetrated
>>41696510ahh... tale as old as time. maybe you should just transition? if you want a woman with a penis, you can just be a transbian.
>>41690428whats wrong with that? like seriously? most people are hetero. its expected from any tranny to do what majority of cis women do - date men. And even if it's gay relationship, still one partner is dominant and other one submits. You cant make things work between two subs or two doms.
>>41696607At this point I swear even het relationships are more flexible than gay ones
>>41686470jews of the gender
