Is it really a good look for LGBT to be represented by ANOTHER OLD WHITE GUY?
>>41698556I'd be totally ok with it if it was this old white guy instead
>>41698556americans will only elect old straight white guysthe average trumper has basically made it a point of pride that they stopped a woman from being elected
>>41698556Old white guys are how we get votes, but not old white guys from California.
>>41700391No. The LGBT community in its current state would never accept a woman as president, and you know it. Because the whole election of Trump hinged on the masculine vs feminine, top vs bottom kind of ideology that you yourselves believe strongly in. The woman can't lead, needs a strong man to show us the away. America simply couldn't do without its Daddy Trump to put all of the other emasculated pussy leaders (Zelensky etc) in their place. That is all very much present in LGBT culture. You would never elect a woman, especially one like Kamala.
America would elect a woman if she wasn't hated (Hillary) or bypassed being chosen by the people (Kamala). Democrats elect the worst, no-charisma candidates they can find and are shocked when they lose
>>41700725Female Democratic candidates will always be viewed as diversity hires until the first female Republican president happens, because the latter will be assumed to have gotten there on her political ability, not on her sex.Nobody thinks Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister because of a gender quota.
>>41700803>the latter will be assumed to have gotten there on her political ability, not on her sexIt's the opposite, actually. Female Republicans all look like cheap sex doll bimbos lmao, nobody believe they got there through actual work. Meanwhile, the Democrats are (mostly) visibly competent.
>>41700803>literally try to force women out of the army and navy>"no we are the rational, pro-meritocracy party!"why are republicans so retarded?
>>41700674You don't sound serious but LGBT people almost entirely voted for Kamala Harris lol
>>41702125actually the sex doll bimbo types work very hard, don't be a retard.
>>41700803>>41702174Most likely why the TERF movement gained so much traction. I know people who even wrote off Kamala Harris as a sex doll bimbo. Likewise the LGBT community would probably never take a gay flamer seriously as president.
>>41698556I would sexo him so why not
I would vote Tulsi Gabbard for Prez any day
>>41702139Only sexists agree to the changing of rules to accomodate a genders weakness
>>41702125You understand kamala sucked her way to her position, yeah?
>>41702782It's not really a surprise that all three female UK PMs have been conservatives. People intuitively understand that to rise to the top of a conservative party, you have to be good at your job. If nothing else, the guy at the top is never gonna let you sleep your way into taking his job.
Homophobic jokes aside, the future will have a lot more gay male Republicans, which will undoubtedly complicate things.Their association with democrats has nothing to do with politics save for the fact that Republicans used to openly shun gay men.But Republicans literally became more accepting of gay men, Trump's Treasury Secretary is openly gay, plenty of other staff openly gay, while cis straight Democrats risk losing more by mocking a man for sucking dick.
>>41703236>If nothing else, the guy at the top is never gonna let you sleep your way into taking his job.That's how most conservative women get their positions though. Since conservatards don't think too highly of women, they tend to see the competent ones as a threat and the only way to negate the defensive reaction is by affirming the stereotype. This has happened a million times before and it will happen a million times after we're all gone.I have to say your opinions are kind of niche, too. No one I've ever met thinks conservative women rise on merit and therefore warrant more confidence. No one.
>>41703272They perceive top and bottom gaps very differently
>>41703293Gays* im gay
>>41703293So do you.
>>41703287It's something you wish was true, but is not. Are they tacky, patriarchal, and misguided? Absolutely, but I would still never dismiss JK Rowling as someone who slept her way to the top.
>>41703637>It's something you wish was trueMy friend, I literally work with politicians. Conservatives are the ones who immediately suspect a woman with as little as a pinch of power to be a whore. You're being a little uninformed here.
>>41698556I would vote for him over Kamala or Pritzker.
