>>41700038
that was already the meta

yes like I've been saying it for years now that trans lesbian means transmasc but delusional transbians dont wanna hear it

just women being sexist. nothing new.

>>41700084
What do you mean ?

>>41700050
Yeah but unfortunately most cis lesbians seem to not be okay with their butch gf getting meta/phallo. Wich is weird since the butches getting srs usually where/are stone tops so it isn't like their gf was seeing their genitals before anyway.

>>41700084
it's sexist to alter your own body??

>>41700097
women are more discriminatory on the basis of sex than men. that's why they needed to invent a label for homosexual women (lesbian) instead of just being gay. gay encompasses male|male and female|female love, but women that hate men had to invent an entirely new category to oust or other men. a post-srs trans man still being considered a lesbian is founded in sexism because they still see the individual as a woman post transition to the extent that they feel they should be included as lesbians whilst they continue to exclude post srs trans women.

i'll give you another example: why is a straight man dating a trans woman such a tabboo? because women will shame him and call him gay for it. i wouldn't say they're a kinsey scale 1 heterosexual, but they're certainly not the kinsey scale 6 that women will act like they are. or like, say a woman wants to hate on a man. what does she do? immediately resorts to stripping him of his masculinity by accusing him of being a fag.

just because women aren't more physically violent (part if which is because female on male violence is under reported as society shanes the man when a woman beats him) doesn't mean they aren't psychologicall or emotionally abusive. look at how lesbians have the highest rates of divorce and domestic abuse, then tell me more about how men are the problem. it's not men that are the problem. it's unchecked misandry as women bask atop their ivory towers.

>>41700217
women rarely get the lesson that they need to control themselves or people see them as a monster. they never have that experience of getting too pissed off around others, and that causing a look of genuine fear in the people watching.

>>41700217
>a post-srs trans man still being considered a lesbian is founded in sexism because they still see the individual as a woman post transition to the extent that they feel they should be included as lesbians whilst they continue to exclude post srs trans women.
What bout post srs afab lesbians that's identify as such and do not believe themselves to be men ? I don't think there is anything sexist there from the lesbians that date them. And most cis lesbians are definitely willing to date trans women wether post srs or not.

>>41700038
If I break up with my boyfriend (gay ftm) I'll probably end up looking into the lesbian dating pool

>>41700217
>look at how lesbians have the highest rates of divorce and domestic abuse.
Barely, and not in any significant way

>>41700217
>men. a post-srs trans man still being considered a lesbian is founded in sexism because they still see the individual as a woman post transition to the extent that they feel they should be included as lesbians whilst they continue to exclude post srs trans women.
I really dont see how seeing trans men as women and trans women as men contrubutes to sexism. IMO it's helping break down gender rolesand sex inequality because we acknowledge that having a flat chest and a phallus is okay for a woman and vice versa for men.

>>41700217
you think it’s women that call men gay for dating trans women and not other men?

afabs going on a gender adventure? well sure, it's like kids saying they want to be a fire truck, nobody takes them seriously for a reason

>>41701717
>that having a flat chest and a phallus is okay for a woman and vice versa for men.
Then why not get rid of these categories altogether? They're clearly pointless in that case