https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/dec/03/womens-institute-no-longer-accept-trans-women-members-aprilgetting really sick of these fake ass “we hear you” after doing insanely transphobic shit.
Cis women cannot be trusted to defend trans women.If we are to be deemed legally male, then we must turn to promoting male rights.
What the hell even is "women's institute" and why should anyone care
>>41893594>What the hell even is "women's institute" and why should anyone careAverage transphobe who is worried about the heckin females mindset
>>41893594Its an organisation, women get together to bake cakes, do embroidery, discuss books etcCommunity centre stuff
>>41893361>getting really sick of these fake ass “we hear They were forced to because of the recent ruling in the UK. You even screenshotted part of them saying that.
>>41893693> They were forced to because of the recent ruling in the UK.the UK supreme court ruling was narrowly tailored to bathrooms, now its being used for this and military.
>>41893758They better not draft me. I low key do want to see british moids drafted because theyve been so horrible to me
>>41893361doing shit after being legally forced allegedly?you might expect everyone to be into civil disobedience however that takes a special kind of person, and most humans aren't all that...
>>41893625nta but ?
>>41893758well yeah, because you guess who can give sneaky handouts to shift the ruling
>>41894543The average transphobe literally doesn't care about women, they typically hate them about as much as trans people but focusing on trans people is more palatable when you cry "but these poor women get their rights taken away"
>>41894557but the comment was about the woman's institute and why anyone should bother, which isn't in any way transphobic in itself.i wonder the same myself but can't be arsed checking it. that's something the op should have done, yes, even here in this dying cesspit.
>>41893567>then we must turn to promoting male rights.That's literally what you do all the time.
>>41894620uhm google it? It's not our job to educate you
>>41893361Well cause they're not women. We don't have to play your games.
>>41894644Very funny, but no. I used to be pro-choice; now I'm pro-fathers' rights because of terfs.
>>41893361>billionaire goes on crusade against trannies>every newspaper gleefully treats trannies like sex pests>government decides to use trannies as scapegoat for horrible policies>all organisations pressured to disavow trannies or be shut down, or sued into oblivion by aforementioned billionairesI love democracy. I really feel this reflects the organic will of the people. If a rich person decides they hate a group, that group should never be happy ever again.
>>41894750Quick, send that rich person more rape and murder threats, maybe it'll change her mind this time.
>>41894682Unironically Fathers4Justice wasn't anywhere near as retarded and cringey as the average TERF.
>>41894765>goes on internet>gets called mean names>throws a shitfit and decides to devote life to torturing tranniesNormalfags should never have been allowed online.
>>41894765>ohmygawd, israel will continue to promote my goyslop if i help with the agenda>hmm how to do it>oh i know i will claim that some twitter accounts were mean to me you know sjw metoo hehe
>>41894682You should be pro choice again because the TERFs are swinging pro-life lmao
>>41894682Very funny but yes. You're just in a circle lol.
>>41893361Cant blame with how most trans women look and behave.
>>41894895Nah. I'm not simply going to pick the opposite stance to terfs. Fathers should not have to accept their unborn children being murdered.
>>41893361>rename yourself the "ciswomen's and tranwomen's institute"There, problem solved. You've explicitly declared that you're a group inclusive of both cis and transwomen, so no one can claim you must exclude trannies because you said "women".Dunno why brits are so retarded they can't figure this out.
>>41894750>mfw J K Rolling was at one point in existence considering progressive for making Dumbledore gaydid her brain snap after the harry potter films?
>>41894529> doing shit after being legally forced allegedly?none of these institutions had to legally do anything after supreme court ruling. they just taking their mask off and using to to reveal their true form. same shit here in america we are seeing who are true allies are and who will collaborate either the nazis
>>41893361Trans-identified males have a clear genetic advantage at bake sales, you fucking misogynist. Stop denying biology.
>>41895542I think the issue is you could then be sued if you refused a cis or trans man
>>41895277It's not how they look It's how they behave
>>41895657She said he was gay as opportunistic tokenism that wasn't reflected in the books or any subsequent media produced after the fact. The "celibate gay" is itself a homophobic to trope too. She's always been a paternalistic blairite.
>>41895676you are not britishYou do realize that they can, and will sue? Most people don't want to be sued
>>41895372>im going to adopt the opposite stance to the heckin' terfs>anyway abortion is evilholy shit you're a retard, literally like at least 50% of terfs are pro life now they basically cucked themselves into conservatism at one point. why the fuck would any tranny agree with politics like this? people who are pro life literally think trans people should die lmfao most of them are highly conservative, those who arent are in the minority. holy fuck im so tired of people like this they are retarded
>>41893567yeah so we can be forced back in the closet by them, lol a tranny did not post this and if they did they're a fucking omega hon. just fucking detransition honestly you might as well be a man
>>41895657It was probably around the time autogynephiles started filling her DMs with rape and murder threats.
>>41895923She was knee deep into TERF territory years prior
>>41895808>literally like at least 50% of terfs are pro life nowThat's what you got out of someone saying "sex selective abortion is bad"? Or are you just saying that in bad faith to smear her?
>>41895783> The "celibate gay" is itself a homophobic to trope too.was dumbledore chaste? i think depends on how you do it. i remember poets in Persia, who ever engaged in sex, bit had boyfriends and would create homo erotic poetry
>>41895950It's because "TERFs" are mostly actually tradfems. Baroness Emma Nicholson has long been an ally of the movement and pushed to limit abortion access years ago.
>>41893361They only listen to their corporate donors, and don't want to get stonewalled like Stonewall did. This country is inhospitable and is why I'm a secessionist.
>>41895987>"TERFs" are mostly actually tradfemsOkay, now that I know is a bad faith smear.
>>41896005Who is the face of the modern "TERF" movement?
>>41895764Oh, this a case of "the only legal way to discriminate based on gender is if you are creating a cis-women's group"?Well, I have simple answer to that: do it anyways, and if any men decide to push the limits then acquiesce but shame them for it.e.g. if you create a "ciswomen's and transwomen's football league" and a man asks to join, you let them but screech the entire time to the media that this is the natural consequence of the court ruling. It's not the "transwomen" invading women's spaces now, it's explicitly the cismen, and it's because the government is infringing on your rights to freedom of association to create a "ciswomen's and transwomen's football league" with their misogynistic laws.
>>41896063Congrats! Now all your members have left because the terf-adjacents set up a competing service.
>>41896093Only if your membership lacks solidarity with transwomen.There are going to be niche sports or private organizations that will ride-or-die with us trannies.Not in the UK, but my own workplace has already ungendered our washrooms entirely to backstop against bathroom law bullshit.If a group or its membership is too cowardly to stand with us, then we're right to call it out for its lack of solidarity. The law isn't an excuse.
>>41896021JK Rowling, beloved children's book author?
>>41896215And she's a very classical tradfem lmao. Religious protestant, allies with classical tradfem conservatives, no serious feminist background, etc.
>>41896403What the fuck are you talking about.
>>41897363Seriously. She's been close associates with tradfem politicians like Baroness Emma Nicholson for decades. She's a religious protestant who is almost certainly anti-abortion (she had to be pestered for days into making a comment on the single biggest blow to women's rights in the past century, the overturning of Roe v. Wade). Her politics are built entirely around paternalism. Not a radfem whatsoever.
>>41896403She's a dilettante, just like in the books Harry is a dilettante. No actual values or talent beyond self-promotion and an overwhelming sense of entitlement. Her shitty and derivative slop was rejected over and over before she finally found a publisher.
>>41897405Yeah, she's not a radfem. She's a fem. She's backing women's rights to the hilt, beyond what was publicly acceptable in the past but thanks to her is now acceptable, now because you incels showed her your entire asses.
>>41897421Can you say that again, without sounding mad this time?
>>41897743She supports women's right to be harassed for not being sufficiently feminine. To be doxxed for being too tall. To lose abortion access because she consistently allies with anti-abortion politicians and activists. She's an opportunistic blairite.
>>41897754Can't you understand it?>>41897759Terfs would rather ten cis women suffer than one trans woman not suffer.
>>41897759Disingenuous AND a commie. Should have figured.>>41897777You don't deserve those quads.
>>41897802I'm a commie for calling out her blatant paternalism?Fuck off, shitstain.
>>41897802>You don't deserve those quads.And Rowling didn't deserve to get her slop published, but here we are.
>>41897812No, your use of Blairite as a snarl word gives away that you're a commie.
>>41897843Again, can you say that without sounding mad?
>>41897888Lol, lmao.
>>41895657Wasn't this after the fact twitter canon anyway so it hardly ever counted
Ask me how I can tell people mad about Dumbledore being gay being subtext in the book and not text were born after 9/11.
>>41898095there was no subtext
>>41896146Congrats! Now one of the hiding terfs in your workplace will sue for not having workplace sexed bathrooms, along with indirect sex discrimination for lack of dignity for women.You can't win, but also this country's legal system is so fucked anyway.
>>41898131Solution: women's bathroom is just a single stall, since we now need to expand the men's to accommodate trans women too
>>41898131Also, if you did the "ciswomen's and transwomen's category" in sports, and a cisman claims they are being discriminated against, can't you just point to the fact you allow transwomen and say, "we do allow so-called 'biological males', you just need to transition for us. We'll wait."
>>41898156>since we now need to expand the men's to accommodate trans women too???
>>41898174We just need to rename the categories to "women's" and "competitive."
>>41898174>can't you just point to the fact you allow transwomen and say, "we do allow so-called 'biological males', you just need to transition for us.that's transphobic , being trans is when you say you're trans
>>41898182Suppose there are X men, Y cis women, and Z trans women. Previously the men's needed to accommodate X people, and the women's needed to accommodate Y+Z people. Now the men's needs to accommodate X+Z people (more than before), and the women's only needs to accommodate Y people (less than before), so we need to expand the men's and we can obtain the extra space required by shrinking the women's.
>>41898199Yeah, exactly, the cismale needs to publicly come out as trans, and open themselves up to all their past partners claiming she raped them for not disclosing. kek
>>41898228not at all, he didn't lie about being a biological male so it's 100% legalno trans woman will ever be charged for pretending to be a man
>>41898246the uk government will find a way
>>41898268why would they?
>>41898299Because the defining principle of UK law surround trannies is "trannies are bad and should be punished at every opportunity"
>>41898311yes. the uk establishment is still seething over Goodwin
>>41898311a tranny being literally a man and living as a man and dating women is not something they're going to punish, that's kind of the point
>>41898246>no trans woman will ever be charged for pretending to be a manhttps://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/burkina-faso/>have been used to target LGBT persons, as have provisions relating to identity fraud. If you think identity fraud isn't coming to UK and USA, you are delusional.
>>41896146>Only if your membership lacks solidarity with transwomenMost women literally do not think trans women are women, should not be in women's institutions or the bathrooms or anything, and basically aren't in solidarity with trans women.
>>41898843>Most women literally do not think trans women are women, should not be in women's institutions or the bathrooms or anything, and basically aren't in solidarity with trans women.Citation NEEDED
>>41898896Can't find the poll I was thinking of but here's an easy one to find on Googlehttps://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/blogs/ec_transpoll_20250430.html
>>41893361>guys we totally dont want to do this, a court decision (that sets no legal precedent for us and thus is entirely optional for our purposes) forced us to!!!with this logic you could justify the murder of george floyd>guys i didnt want to asphyxiate him, he was just too menacing and me and the other 2 armed cops were powerless to stop him otherwise! besides we have qualified immunity, so legally we HAVE to kill innocent people
