[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: stuffedmushrooms.jpg (877 KB, 944x950)
877 KB
877 KB JPG
What will the first Western country be to ban cross sex hormones for adults? What is your prediction?
>>
i feel like the uk is easily the most obvious answer with the us as the runner up. are any others on the road to doing it?
>>
>>42006442
In what year do you think the UK will finally do it? Would there be protests if they did?
>>
>>42006452
lol. who would protest? we have no allies except for *some (not even all) queer people who make up like 2% of the population
>>
>>42006475
allies?
robin
>>
>>42006379
the uk, i reckon - the levy review's coming up as is and there's already a lot of consent-manufacturing for the mindset that cross-sex hormones are inherently damaging given just how many pundits are going on about bone illnesses or whatever here
it'll be a weird one though, because i don't think it'll be an out-and-out ban - moreso, the nhs will stop prescribing "for the foreseeable future" (see: forever), then it'll be going after the vanishingly few private healthcare providers who prescribe for "medical malpractice", then it'll be going after diy for being "too accessible to vulnerable children" or whatever
>>42006452
...probably, but nothing of any note, considering the act of protesting at all is about two steps removed from numerous terrorism offences here in the uk nowadays
>>
>>42006583
wouldn't it be crazy if the uk rebelled and actually overthrew the monarchy for good
>>
>>42006590
i mean it would be crazy but it basically couldn't happen, just on a basic sociological level - about half the population would see people rioting on the streets and think something between "fucking somalians causing a ruckus again" or "turn those tranny sympathisers into fucking paste so there's more universal credit to go around"
>>
The UK. It's not even a question.

Runners up: Finland (they actually banned hrt for minors 5 years ago)

Other serious candidates: France (due to demographic change), Sweden (already banned it for minors in 2021 or 22).

The US won't ban it for adults at all. Not this decade and not next decade. Some states will try to make it more difficult for a while, but that's about it.
Reminder that a trans clinic operated legally off of a tractor barn in 2004 - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trans-history-underground-sugical-clinic-b2114777.html

The US is far more resilient to this stuff due to the true federalism that they operate.
>>
>>42006815
Why is Scandinavia so anti-trans?
>>
>>42006379
UK has effectively already banned hrt

Ban hrt?!?! Bitch, they're gonna ban being trans period, thats why they scrapped appealing prison sentences
>>
>>42006379
bulgaria



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.