stop doing this
>>42046374Why? Isn't it accurate?
>>42046381it isn’t
>>42046374>biological manlmfao
>>42046374"Biological man" lol, very scientific
>>42046398I dont think this tweet proves anything one way or the other.Why isn't OP's statement accurate? Thanks
>>42046417trans women are biological women
>>42046471I dont think that's true.
>>42046374You're not my boss
>>42046381it would be more accurate to say "biological males"; the wording is deliberately delegitimizing and stigmatic
>>42046398this is cope
>>42046924I dont understand why that would be more accurate.
>>42046924This is NOT more accurate.
>>42046398Do you have a source for this 60% claim that isn't "the lumpen maoist" in youtube comments
>>42047032The wording is specifically to be discriminatory to trannies while also being inaccurate (medical transition kinda stops making us "biologically male" in any medically or socially useful way)
>>42047047Genetic influence on gender identity is probabilistic and indirect, not deterministic, and no genetic test can identify someone as transgender or intersex.
>>42046967"men" refers to gender while "make" refers to sextrans women are not men who are women they are males (most of the time) who are womenidrc abt the biological technicalities bc at that point why even refer to the sex of anyone everthis definition works for normies and it works for me
>>42046381i think it’s inaccurate because i am significantly, biologically distinct from 99% of males/men
>>42047144If that were true, biological woken could be trans women, and biological men could be trans men.But I dont think you believe that to be true.
this is where the whole gender identity shtick got us. now they "respect" our right to identify as women, but still think of you as a man. we gotta start killing people who use ASAB terminology man
>>42047388explain how you got this because i'm not following
>>42047822Sure.If "men" refers to gender, and "male" refers to sex, that would mean that in theory a biological man could claim to be a trans man, right?I think the only criteria here excluding him from this gender is his sex, which means his sex and gender are the same thing, as his sex is dictating what his gender can/cannot be in this scenario.
>>42047888a male man is cisgender anon to be transgender you need to transition to or from something. a man can't transition to man because he's already that. you can claim whatever you want, i guess, yeah, but words do still mean things
>>42047937Okay. How about a man transitions to a woman, then transitions to a man again. Regardless, my point is, can a man be a trans man? Or can a trans woman be a trans woman? If not, why not?If the answer is "because of their sex", then that means sex dictates gender, if I understand the issue correctly.