If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.
>>42054729I read that all wrong. I thought they were saying if you only date me because I’m trans you’re a phobe. I was so confused.
>>42054729Prostitutes shouldn't be allowed to speak in general.
>>42054729I love to be gay but you love being gay with me?
>>42054729>2025>STILL opticscuckingopticscucks, when will they learn?
>>42054729what if I specifically want to date her because shes trans (as long as she didnt get the surgery)
Stop posting shit nobody cares about as if it's some tranny spokesperson. The most liked comment is a guy trolling OP.
>>42054798honestly fairly based and accurate chaser
>>42054729>resentment'phobes will always find a reason to phobe. Prejudice is a major factor explaining why most people are unwilling to date trannies and the rest is fetishizing them. No matter where this prejudice comes from, I don't care if calling out this prejudice will make the 'phobes phobe more.
i feel like this isn’t even a bad sentiment. it’d be racist to say “i won’t date you because you’re black”. it’d be fatphobic to say “i wont date you because you’re fat”. you can have those preferences, but you can also have tact when rejecting someone
>>42054849if someone's gay is it mysogynistic to say "I won't date you because you're a woman"?
>>42054729>>42054849>>42054865idk why we care about this? wouldn't you only want to date someone who wants to date you? shaming people for not being into the type of person you are will never convince them to fuck you
>>42054849>it’d be racist to say “i won’t date you because you’re black”. it’d be fatphobic to say “i wont date you because you’re fat”.no actually, it wouldn’t be. people are allowed to have sexual preferences
>>42054729>if I lick the boot hard enough it won't kick meRiveting shit OP, the girl in your pic is right, you're wrong
>>42054849i don't carenot wanting to date fat negroes is in fact a very legitimate sexual preference.by your logic homosexuals are misogynists because they don't date women
>>42054984With trannies it's weird. If someone was exactly the same but the only difference is cis vs trans, and it's specifically being trans (not the presence of a penis, not infertility, but just BEING TRANS) that's the issue, then it's transphobia.
>>42055005I think that's only true a tiny minority of the time thoughGenerally if you see an attractive woman who you would fuck, but find out she's trans and change your mind it would be either because of her having a dick or having an SRS pussy.Neither of those are intrinsically because she's trans, it's because you dont like what she has between her legs.I say this as a chaser btw, I can just recognize the distinction
>>42055039I think it applies more in cases where the genitals aren't actually involved.
>>42055039>having an SRS pussyare there really people who don't want to date a tranny specifically because she has a neoclam instead and not a natural pussy? What if it was a cis woman who was born with vaginal agenesis and got some sort of vaginoplasty and now also has a neoclam? Would it be equally icky? Would she have to reveal that her pussy is fake?
>>42054980This is why you lost any and all political representation btw. Keep going though it's gonna work soon!
>>42055069Yes..Talk to any chaser lol. Most of us love cis women with natural pussies, and trans women with dicks. And we're creeped out by SRS.I think a natural pussy that was surgically repaired/altered is quite different from something that started out as a dick and was changed into a pussy.I'd imagine fully straight guys would share the common chaser views of SRS and then some, because they're also against the "before" part of it
>>42054779I mean you're not wrong but this is such a pointless argument. Just because I'm attracted to women doesn't mean I'm attracted to all women. I can quietly refuse to date trannies if I want and there's nothing you can do about it that isn't a sex crime. Even if I am myself a tranny and being a total hypocrite about it.Literally nothing good can come of insisting it's transphobic to not date trans people. The best outcome possible from saying stuff like this is that no one hears you.Might I suggest simply not.
>>42054949normal people who aren’t weird racists can just not date a black person. broadcasting “i won’t date a black person” is racist
>>42055105>I think a natural pussy that was surgically repaired/altered is quite different from something that started out as a dick and was changed into a pussy.how? what is the relevant difference if you are actually having sex with this woman and you're attracted to what you see?
>>42054729Is he wrong, though? The problem with terms like "racism," "sexism," "homophobia," etc. is that they encompass harmless/neutral things like laughing to jokes all the way to murder. Not finding trans people *CAN* be seen as transphobic, but it's the harmless/neutral kind, so it doesn't matter, as you can't micromanage people's emotions.
>>42055163Depends if it's prompted or not. It's just honesty.
>>42055299i guess that’s fair. i’d probably still say to make something up, but if someone’s asking for a reason to the rejection i could see just saying it
>>42055189I think it's the knowledge that I'm sticking my dick into what was once a penis and was surgically altered into a hole resembling a vagina. I just don't like the idea of it.
>>42055350That just sounds like transphobia then (especially when penile inversion isn't the only kind of SRS)
>>42055359I think if a female pussy was surgically altered to the extent of an SRS one I'd feel similarly. I just have a hard time believing that any sort of reconstructive surgery would be that invasive. Really I'm just describing an aversion to surgical wounds.It isn't transphobic and I love MTF trannies
>>42055069Absolutely, fuck that noise, the idea of it makes me sort of nauseous
>>42055329I'd probably just lie. Though, I don't have a racial preference, anyway.
>>42055359You can call it what you want, but people can't help their feelings. I personally find it "icky," too. Not out of malice.
>>42055563Most prejudice isn't out of malice desu.
>>42055570Prejudice isn't inherently bad. Black people are overrepresented in violent crime. So if you passively avoid black people, that's prejudice, but understandable. If you hear an Indian on the phone and immediately think it's going to be a scam, then that is also prejudice. Prejudice against gypsies in Europe is encouraged, often even saying sentences word-for-word as conventional anti-black racism.
>>42055368>any sort of reconstructive surgery would be that invasiveMost internal ones are that invasive. In some cases they have to make a pussy out of nothing
>>42054729i'm pretty sure this troon is just trying to annoy people for the engagementXitter has insanely bad incentives right now>>42055350That just makes it hotterImagine dominating a dick so hard it turns into a pussy
>>42055570Not finding something or someone sexually attractive isn't prejudice. We can extend the same logic to facial features. Some facial features are just not sexually attractive. Most people won't be able to articulate why they find the features unattractive, but they just do. And that's not wrong, but rather is a preference.
>>42055083>oooohhhh the trannies made your groceries more expensive ooooOOOOoooRetard
>>42055971they literally didtrannies got trump elected who put tariffs up
>>42054980They are right, but it doesn't matter if it's transphobic. They are allowed to have preferences.
>>42056053If someone wants to fuck a person up until they find out they were trans the attraction didn't change, only the phobia didSimple as
>>42054798>>42054808Idgi
>>42054729oh fuck off.
>>42056631if you're going to call that transphobia you're going to meet a lot of transphobesyou cannot force other people to see you the way you prefer them toalso how do you feel about gay men who are attracted to mtfs
>>42057024>gonna meet a lot of transphobesNah>force other peopleRetard, the thing we're talking about here isn't about forcing people, it's about people who are attracted but lose intrest due to transphobic viewsNo force involved you mongoloid>gay people liking mtfs Bisexuals then?
>>42057024>gay men who are attracted to mtfsnot even considered gay by their tranny obsessed counterparts geg
>>42057104people just lose interest because they want a certain thing that a tranny doesn't have it's not within your control to tell them how to be attractedsome of them are, some of them aren't, it's not a phobia either way and it comes off as needy and pathetic to complain about it>gay people liking mtfsmtfs can still be experienced as maleyou're also denying gay sexuality and are being homophobic
>>42056631>I want to fuck this girl >I find out her grandfather is black >Racism.exe>I do not want to fuck this girl
>>42054798That guy has more updoots than the trans person haha
>>42056631Retarded take
>>42057171>people with a black grandparent have different genitals to people who don't have a black grandparentretarded analogy alert
>>42057145>lose interestWhy do you think they lose intrest you disingenuous hack>muh needy and patheticCool, idc>gay>maleGays are attracted to men, not malesDifference there buddy
>>42057256>Gays are attracted to men, not maleshey pooner, you don't get to tell gay men they're being gay wrong
>>42055069My dad won't even date a cis woman who's had any work down there. He divorced one of his wives for getting a hysto with her cervix removed (cancer) because he didn't like how it felt and told everyone. He will go on rants about hypothetical neovaginas he's never encountered potentially feeling the same without prompting.
>>42057320Your dad is a rephon
>>42057339Not them, but your opinion doesn't count for much.You have such a high level of retardation that even Tim Walz is jealous.
>>42057356No clue who that is or why I should care tbhon
>>42054729wouldn't you want a transphobe to be honest with you?I dont get what the point would be for calling them out
>>42056631Yeah, I'm not arguing it's not transphobic, I'm arguing that it doesn't matter if it is transphobic because people are allowed to have preferences, even if it's petty, racist, transphobic, etc. Because these instances of racism and transphobia are not harmful, as you're not entitled to sex from people.
>>42058298>people are allowed to be racist, sexist, transphobic because uhm this will surely only apply to this one scenario
>>42058308people are allowed to reject you for any they wantdoesn't matter if it's for hateful reasons, it literally does not matter at all, it's their choice
>>42058334>noo don't call out racism,transphobia,sexism, etc.
>>42058346you can have an incel crashout because someone rejected you if you feel like I wont stop you
it's 2025 and we're back to the "it's homophobic to not be gay" discourse
>>42058365Pointing out someone is racist/sexist/transphobic is far from a crashout bud, nice deflection tho
>>42058346NTA, but no one is saying NOT to call out racism, transphobia, sexism, etc. but rather people are allowed to have preferences for the people they sleep with or form a relationship with. Like, are you trying to bully people into having sex with you?
>>42058373Time is a flat circle.
>>42054849>it’d be fatphobic to say “i wont date you because you’re fat”.But there's nothing wrong with being fatphobic, particularly in dating preferences. So you're basically saying there's nothing wrong with transphobia.
>>42058378>pointing it out means I want to sleep with themWhat are you on aboutWhy would I ever want to even get close to a retarded nazi?
>>42058377if they're not harming anyone with their bigotry then it literally doesn't matteryou being angry about not getting laid isn't anyone's problem but yours
>>42058396Again, you assuming someone is just selectively racist sexist and or transphobic in this one regard is absurd and void of reality
There are thousands of tranny accounts on Xitter who just post this same kind of cheap engagement bait word for word. If you're a cute tranny it's a free money cheat
>>42058407You encapsulate everything that sucks about tripfags. Why do you trip? Why do you want all of these retarded gay comments to be attributed to you? You have no idea how fucking female you are lmao
>>42058392I'm specifically talking about when you said:>"If someone wants to fuck a person up until they find out they were trans the attraction didn't change, only the phobia did"Because it being transphobic is irrelevant, as people are allowed to have preferences, doesn't matter how petty. Just like you're allowed to call it transphobic.
>>42058421I'm enby so idgi what you mean by female, sorry buddy
>>42058407you can totally not be ok with dating trans people but also be any allyhere in reality everyone has preferences and yes a lot of them are stupid and not really justifiablebut the thing is, no one has to justify their preferences because it's their right to reject anyone they want for any reason they want
>>42058433>Umm actually I'm the made up gender women claim they are when they want attention
>>42058436>>42058431>it's their right to not sleep with someone Duh>it's their right to be racist/sexist/phobicNuh
>>42058407>you assuming someone is just selectively racist sexist and or transphobic in this one regard is absurd and void of realitySome people might, while some people might not. Just because you don't want to have sex with someone doesn't mean you'll treat them bad in other regards.
>>42058450I don't know what you're getting at here. If someone doesn't want to have sex with someone when they found out they're trans, what do you believe should be done about that?
>>42058407if you just assume someone is a hardcore bigot just because they wont fuck you then you're a deranged incel bruh
>>42058483They should be treated like any other transphobe>>42058461P much does tho
>>42058494>They should be treated like any other transphobeI don't know what that means. Are you implying violence?
>>42058488>hardcore bigotNah just your average bigot
>>42058505Are you simple?
>>42058527Well, I don't know what "They should be treated like any other transphobe" means specifically. Does it just mean to call them names?
>>42058509Then being a bigot is okay.
>>42054729Winter needs to be a bit more specific. Some people have genital preferences, and neo-vaginas are just wounds you have to keep open.
>>42058630The neat thing is it's not transphobic to refuse to date trans people, but inevitably everyone who wants to justify it ends up saying something transphobic and often additionally stupid.
>>42059080How would you not come across as transphobic if asked why you don't date trans people, though?
>>42054729Trannies are just really retarded by nature. They should dogpile people like this but they don't. Trannies don't seem to understand that you can't force people to like you.
>>42059320if you're genuinely never attracted to trans people, then it's not transphobic to not date oneif you're genuinely never attracted to black people, then it's not racist to not date onebut that isn't how people work. Even racists and transphobes are sometimes attracted to black people and trans people
>>42054729every social media platform is full of bots calling for genocide and this is what you’re worried about?
>>42059320it’s easy:-it’s just not my preference-i didn’t feel a spark (this works all the time for everything)when women reject shorter men they’re not being heightphobic or whatever garbage terms incels invent. they lack the attraction to them. you can’t negotiate attraction. deep down everyone knows this. it’s also true that cis people are nasty to trans people. just be civil and keep it short by saying “i didn’t feel a spark” if you went on a date and you weren’t attracted. if you have to let a trans person down, just say you’re not looking to date. these are simple diplomatic explanations that save their feelings
>>42054729Why is it that trannies and leftists are so faggy? Their personalities are so annoying.
>>42059320Depends on what your reason is. Straight? Want kids? There's your answer! Also a convenient copout if you just want to avoid sounding like an asshole. Or you could say nothing. "No" is always good enough.Genital preference? Personally I think that's fair.Squicked out by the vague concept of srsussy? Maybe keep that to yourself. You don't actually owe anyone a reason.Think trans people are ugly and can't imagine being attracted to one? How would you respond if an ugly person asked you out? Do you tell them they're too ugly? Maybe if you're both 12 or if you're a husstuss but if you're posting here I assume you're neither.>>42059412Extremely this.
>>42054865no but if he transitioned and the gay guy said the same thing then it would be, make sense?
>>42055350the dick was a pussy first tho so this still doesn’t make sense
>>42054729that bitch is crazy peepole
>>42054729>If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.>If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.>If you talk like this you should probably be prevented from having a public platform. Nothing breeds more resentment towards trans people than this rhetoric.RETARDS. DON'T ANY OF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THESE FABRICATED STORIES ARE ENGAGEMENT BAIT. OHHHH WOW GUYS WOW A TRANS WOMAN WITH A PURPOSEFULLY INFURIATING STORY HAS AN ONLYFANS LINK IN HER BIO. WHAT'S THAT ANGRY PEOPLE KEEP REPLYING TO HER AND SIGNAL BOOSTING HER ONLYFANS LINK IN HER BIO. OHH LOOK AT ME I'M THE GULLIBLE FUCKTARD THAT GENUINELY AND UNIRONICALLY BELIEVES A TRANS WOMAN WAITED TEN DATES TO DISCLOSE. FELL FOR IT AGAIN AWARD YOU GINORMOUS FAGGOTS
>>42054849There's nothing wrong with being racist/fat phobic/whateverist though. You don't need permission to associate with who you want to and can dislike who you want for any reason. That is an inalienable right, God given, innate and inherent that nobody can take from you and you should fight anybody who tries.The very fact that /lgbt/ exists is because we exclude the straights, which is straight phobic or whatever gay fucking ass identity politics term you retards come up with. The point is everybody excludes other people so it's ok. It's how groups and communities are formed and it's how people have standards within those groups.The modern world's obsession with being the thought police is horrific. Be free instead.
>>42058377Its pretty incel fella. Nobody has a right to anyone elses body. If you struggle with feels of anger because you do not get to control other peoples bodies you should touch grass.
Why are trannies so incelly and rapey when it comes to straight people? You're not owed sex from anyone, loser.
>>42061976You failed reading comprehension buddy
>hundreds of replies to a screencap of xitter engagement baitwhy are all of you so retarded?
>>42062756Some people actually believe that, though. Just like some people actually believe communism will work. You telling me all those pro-communism comments are merely ragebait, too?
>>42062756that complaint doesn't really work when you have dozens of posters in this very thread agreeing with the "engagement bait"
>>42063467it's an open secret that they're just larping to ragebait. you would have to be seriously retarded to believe communism would work.
>>42063502I've noticed leftists deny the existence of things, even if that thing literally exists close by or can be easily seen. Like they said no leftist was calling that jeans ad Nazi propaganda, when there's literally leftists in the same thread calling the jeans ad Nazi propaganda. Or when Biden only had a cold or a stutter. I don't know if they think they're smarter than they are or they genuinely believe the things they say. Because being a bad faith weasel is probably why Trump won.
