Back in the 2000s and early 2010s they told us to be who we wanted and it would be fine. That we could be gay or w/e and they would be fine with us. That we could be accepted for who we were.Then we came out as trans and they did a complete 180 and told us to fuck off.What's the lesson? That they were lieing? Was it malicious to lure us out? Or was it something more like:>"We can accept gay people as they are different but we cannot accept you agp because you could be a straight man, you are too much like the ingroup. We can accept the downtrodden but not the well off embracing their decadence"Thoughts?
>>42058710Boomers are idiots who live in a fantasy land where they think if they let people do what they want they'll just happen to make personal choices that align entirely with their own morals. They're the very definition of wanting to have their cake and eat it too, they want to be the cool hippie generation but they also seethe over anything that doesn't align with what life was like in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.
>>42058710because there's a difference between accepting a sexuality that's your own business vs denying plain biological reality and harming kids and womens rights...
>>42058724yeah so then why do they harm trans kids and trans womens rights?
>>42058710No, there was a massive right wing influence campaign orchestrated partly by foreign actors simply seeking to sow divisions in our country to weaken it, and partly by the covert, revanchist extremist right which found an avatar in the form of a charismatic real estate mogul. Boomers on average lack the critical thinking skills to determine what is and isn't propaganda due to growing up during the cold war when they were being inculcated in pro American propaganda themselves
>>42058785Boomers fell for Russian propaganda back then too tho. They've always bought into it. Nixon was right about them.
>>42058785it's plain to see that the left pushed tranny ideology down everyone's throats and theyre seeing a grass roots reactionthe billionaires are people like stryker, pritzker, soros pushing left wing tranny bullshit
>>42058799>Grass roots reaction>Looks inside>Funded by billionaires and autocratic nations
>>42058799You might be a zoomer and too young or w/e.In the 2000s/early 2010s we were shoved down our throats with gay propaganda and told to be accepting. That gays and lgbt were accepted.So some trans believe that, become accepting themselves, and come out. Only now no acceptance for them.
>>42058816this is a dumb conspiracy theorycorporations and NGOs put billions into shoving trannies everywherethey got bankrolled by billionaires and dumb rich woke foids like mckenzie bezosif you want money you push tranny ideology
>>42058850>>42058824Shartybot posts
>>42058850>dumb conspiracy theoryThe most vocal sources of transphobia in the anglosphere are the richest man in the world and the reigning power in the most powerful country in the world.
>>42058710yeah it's like when you get called a girl over and over again as an insult while growing up, and then as soon as you agree with them and decide to be a girl, suddenly you're a big manly man who was always a man and definitely not a girl, and when you were born the doctor said "it's a man!"
>>42059068I never got why being a girl was an insult at all desu.
>>42059089because misogyny
>>42058850corporations and NGOs were responding (they thought cheaply) to the demands of their workforce. if you want to hire the most talented young graduates, it's cheap to say your values are the same as theirs and costly to do basically anything else. so you get a lot of cheap 'woke' gestures, but not much real change.when young people continued to demand change after getting the cheap gestures, real power-brokers started throwing their money at trump and are now bowing quickly to his demands to abandon even the gesturing. but that can't permanently alter the fact that wokeism was-and-is a bottom-up movement (of young, educated people) and that the reaction is mostly top-down (with older people as their cannon fodder)
>>42058710>gay and trans are completely unrelated!>men are not gay for dating us!>what do you mean you wanna suck my gock, what are you a fag?>why do people accept gays and not us?
>>42059192No one person has ever made these 4 arguments together.
