I follow a couple of trans girls on Twitter as we're interested in similar hobbies but I've noticed their sexuality manifests in a different way to me (cisfoid). They're ostensibly heterosexual (male attracted) but it seems like they're primarily interested in sexual fantasies where the woman is the central focus and the man is unseen, as in they retweet things like ugly bastard porn. They aren't interested in anime that seems to appeal to other cis girls I know either, they're more into stuff like Touhou and Monogatari. Also, sometimes they say really politically incorrect things that aren't typical of cis women. There's no point to this post. Thanks for reading my blog.
>>42063141The sperg cis women I know have pretty much the same personality and usually interests as trannies, it's just the tism
>>42063150it's probably something like this desu although i could also absolutely believe that something about exposure to testosterone or male socialisation causes irreparable damage that manifests like this
>>42063141do you really think that they count as "women?"
>>42063141Yeah because transbians like me are real women and they aren't (I like Showa Genroku Rakugo Shinjuu, Princess Jellyfish, Nana, March Comes in Like a Lion)
>>42063141i have read female-written smut and you guys focus a lot on the woman / self-insert too. a lot of the time you people'll write more about the woman's body than the guy's. sometimes they won't describe the guy at all! it feels like they mostly care about the guy's lust for them, or the meaning the interaction takes on (power dynamics or whatever)i think it's just a matter of degrees. women do still care about how a guy looks, and they can feel a lust toward them, but not to the degree gay men do and not as commonly. while for some agps, that's hardly present at all. gay men are direct (they objectify), women are more indirect (they objectify both themselves and their partner), while agps are basically in orbit lol (they only objectify themselves).this is very general of course.
>>42063157Yea this doesnt track with personal exp on both. It's just the tism and socialization combined with GD. For reference both appeal to me but I rly like the online culture associated with the weirder things....besides the really sappy yuri
>>42063157i mean. male socialization definitely changes people’s psyche, and testosterone probably has long-reaching effects on it too. but the psyche is malleable, and it’s weird to describe people being one way or another as “damage”like saying. bringing your kid to cricket games as a child permanently damaged them because they like cricket now
>>42063194ig you're right and maybe i shouldn't think of innocent differences in taste like that but there are definitely some things online trans women are into that i think speak to a kind of damage, like mostly in terms of sexuality
>>42063257although come to think of it i think a lot of female/femme sexuality boils down to 'what if i relived all my trauma but in a hot way this time so it's fine' so maybe the fucked up sexuality is kind of the most female thing about trans women
>>42063257well i think thats usually trauma not male socialization or testosterone. like often the trauma coincides with those two things but usually the sexual deviances of the transgenders are reflections of their psychological traumaslike, ie, you see the same exact weird sexual deviances in cis women with the same traumasi’m using trauma kinda loosely here but i think u get what i mean
>>42063141> Trannies have similar interests to autistic men> Pooners have similar interests to autistic womenI wonder why?
>>42063292i think a lot of trans women would consider male socialisation and testosterone to be very traumatic desu
>>42063288this is male sexuality too though. kinda crazy you don't realise that.
>>42063309to be male sexuality seems to be like 90% 'ooooh tiddies' but sometimes you swap tiddies out for whatever other body part they're into. i'm probably wrong but that's just what i see
>>42063327yeah you're wrong.
