>>42064346
I can speak Spanish but I'm not transphobic

link?

cuál es la lógica aquí

i assume the article is doing a strawman who doesn't like grammatical gender

>>42064419
Almost certainly.
What's weird is that grammatical gender should not be a problem for binary trans people. Hell, most languages that have grammatical gender also have a neuter gender that should cover enbies.
It just seems like a bad faith article by a chud that just discovered a basic feature many languages have.

>>42064346
>2023

>>42064706
2023 was 2 years ago, why are you acting like it was 60 years ago?

>>42064376
yo quiero saber también
>>42064419
must be this

>>42064453
my chudass slavic language has a 3rd gram. gender but its for inanimate objects and unspecified wild animals
I just use the masculine ones cause theyre basically the default for speaking about people and i honestly dont care

>>42064419
>>42064453
if it really is this that's even weirder bc in recent years i have seen more and more (though not exactly many) people aware of and using "e" as a neuter inflection in Spanish. very silly of me to be conjecturing about this article without even looking at it (i'm not going to look at it) and this may not even be what oppicrel is about but if that IS what it is about it's even more absurd lol