would trannies have more rights in a communist state?
well ussr first country on earth to legalize SRS in 1926
Yes. /pol/ told me communism is when trannies rule and /pol/ is never wrong.
>>42067985Eventually, no. Trannies are a psyop designed to prime people for communism. Essentially, if youll believe that a woman has a dick, youll believe anything. Its about training people to believe, or pretend to believe (since so many pro tranny people wont actually date one so we know they are being performative) what theyre told rather than what is plain to the eye, which is essential under a communist system which will invariably fail and thats survival is tied to its ability to convince its people (or again, so destroy their spirit that they pretend to believe) that up is down, black is white, women have dicks, there are no bread lines, you have no individual rights etc. The necessity of troons after the commies take power is less than during the slide into it, and their value as workers or enforcers is next to zero. You are useful tools only during the colour revolution itself and the people bankrolling your movement detest you, would sooner die than see their sons become you, and will discard of you once theyve used you like the chasers who pander to your “womanhood” until they bust a nut. You wont have a place at the communism table any more than a chaser is bringing you home for thanksgiving. Learn about the “foot in the door” conman technique and consider its application in regards to cults or say, since you bring it up, North Korea.
>>42069317>cissoid fag reuses talking points, incapable of independent thought or inquiryTell us more about what a free thinker you are for fighting trannyism
>>42069374Thats one approach to take when you cant actually refute whats being said. Youre never, ever going to be a woman. Thats the tragedy of your situation. There are people with utopian beliefs they cling to hoping one day they could take power and have it come true, the most endearing of which is to be king or close to it (ultimately all revolutions are about shifting power from one group to another not doing away with it altogether. And sadly, as unlikely as their success is it is theoretically possible. But you could become king of the entire world tomorrow, all the money and manpower in the world, and you still couldnt become a woman. What could i even really say or do to you that would make your situation worse than it already is, you are chasing something that isnt there and nothing could be more sad.
>>42069507There's nothing of value being said other than your paranoid delusions. Roughly 0% of communism (even socialism) has been built in the west. Just because you respectively dislike trannies and communism doesn't make them the same thing.
>>42068026SRS has never been illegal anywhere
>>42069776You cant read or write. You just said my paranoid delusions were of value. I clearly stated that trannies are a psyop used to destabilise society and lead us into a colour revolution, and they have no use to the communist system once theyve served this purpose. Which is why theyre being pushed so hard in countries that are collapsing into communism by those that intend to facilitate that collapse. I dont dislike trannies because trannies do not exist. Transition between genders is not achievable and likely never will be. I dont dislike people who pretend to be women, necessarily, but none of them are women. You are a man pretending to be a woman, you equate my saying that with disliking you because you dislike that simple truth. You are a man and always, always will be.
>>42069918You would need to understand what communism is and that it has not been achieved in the west, first. Most communists dislike fags and trannies and their identity politics, they're called "class reductionists". You're just living under a form of capitalism (fag colors on swipe credit card) and modernity that you personally dislike, and think it's communism because you also personally dislike communism.
