what do you guys think of the "bew" lgbt flag? i always found it retarded, especially the black and brown part, but i find even the trans part unnecessary
>>42073495we need to do away with flags altogether and go back to using jewelry and hankies to signal our identities, and speaking in Polari. I wanna live in a time where being a massive faggot is counter cultural and dangerous, not some bullshit sponsored by Spotify answer Target
>>42073495What's a bew flagAnd imo I think it shouldn't exist, the original flag was already enough, and if anything the new one has only give "lgbs" more of a reason to divide the community
>>42073495The whole thing is retarded because it's too broad of a coalition. Many of these interest groups are at odds with each other. Black neighborhoods have some of the most homophobia you'll find in all of America. Lesbians are often times TERF's who view transwomen as males appropriating their identity. There's so many different perspectives being sandwiched into this flag. If the flag is just supposed to signal the Democrat base and that's the common denominator, then by that logic you might as well slap an Islamic crescent in the middle of the flag while you're at it.
>>42073495a little too on the nose given the whole "trannies are invading queer spaces" that phobes spout>>42073535forever convinced "any lesbian you meet is in danger of being a TERF" is a (successful) psyop. doesn't mean most of them will ever come close to wanting to fuck us but they still like having us around
>>42073495
>>42073547>is a (successful) psyop.You only say that because you too are convinced that the vast majority of cis lesbians hate our guts. But at the same time since you identify as lesbian yourself you're too attached to the label to see what is plainly in front of you. Pic rel is what they unironically believe
>>42073570every cis lesbian i meet irl, even the ones who have had shit experiences with trannies, does not believe this. otherwise yes you've read me for filth.
>>42073495The pozzed(tm) flag? I avoid businesses and organizations that fly it
>>42073570Logically all of those would follow though if transwomen are women. If the trans modifier doesn't change the term woman in any way and both are women then surely they would be entitled to the same treatment and same spaces?
>>42073626cis women are not honest with their beliefs, all lesbians secretly hate trannies except for maybe the husstuss model types
>>42073755>if transwomen are womenIf transwomen were women, and not a 3rd party gender,we wouldn't need the word/category.
>>42073495It is the epitome of American politics, it's just designed to divide people and turn their attention away from wealth inequality.>make flag that represents everyone, giving them unity>force new flag that presents the false idea that the rainbow flag doesn't represent everyone
>>42073495The implication that black and brown people are gay is just too funny.
the extra colors are unnecessary, symbolically speaking. the flag has always represented trans and brown people. it was not intended for gay marriage only.if anything, I would say the new flag and its popularity is basically in line with the way liberals / progressives are tacitly on board with reactionary narratives. the inclusion flag states that trans and brown people are a later addition to the coalition and erases our historical importance.>>42073705I can't imagine doing this desu. most people who use the flag mean well, they're just ignorant about history. 99% of queer anything uses the flag now and cutting yourself off from the community over what boils down to a question of semantics seem hopelessly morose and bitter.
>>42073495You've been making this thread for years
>>42073985It's the point I'm making. Expecting full "same" treatment in every way is the price they'll pay if they agree that transwomen are women. If they want to treat transwomen differently then they have to draw the line with the starting principal that transwomen are not the same.
offensively unaesthetic
