How long do you have to be on HRT before you getting to the point where you legitimately might lose fights against cis women?
>>42075067obviously depends on who you are, I probably would have gotten beaten up fighting a cis woman even before hrt but im sure there are some trans women who would be much stronger even after a while on it
>>42075067i would have lost fights to most cis women pre-hrt. in highschool my at the time girlfriend was pinning me down on her bed with ease and laughing at how weak i was. the whole premise of this question wrong and stupid and sexist.
>>42075067You will never lose to a woman without throwing because of your immutable advantages in height, reach, bone density, muscle composition, reflexes, and pain threshold
>>42075226Males should be killed
>>42075240Big agree, I'll start whipping up some zyklon
>>42075226of these i am barely at parity with the average woman. my torso and arms are short. my height is an advantage but not by much given there are plenty of women around 5'8. my bones have never been all that large or durable. my muscle mass has always been meager. reflexes are a maybe, i seem to be more attentive than the average woman. pain threshold is laughable, most female techs tell me to toughen up in polite terms and i am convinced men have a lower pain tolerance than women do.
>>42075226the text of this post is just misogyny
misandry thread
>>42075323It's not about muscle mass, you have more fast-twitch muscle fibers which means that if you worked out for once in your skinnyfat life you'd be better suited to fighting than a real womanYour biological role is to murder, rape, and then get killed
>>42075067She has a cute tummy, who is she?
>>42075340I don't want to be misogynist, all of these things are bad. There needs to be a multilateral drawdown in the number of males for the safety of human civilisation
>>42075352my biological role is to suckle on the underdeveloped cock of a natalist pedophile, but i have no intention of fulfilling that.are you so certain i have more fast twitch muscle fibers? because given my slight figure and near total lack of pubertal bone development im not so sure i can count on this blessed androgen gift to have actually delivered on its promises.
>>42075067i think the general consensus was 3 years on hrt for sports (before current administration changes), which realistically means an average of 6 years minimum assuming both were participating in somewhat equal levels of physical activity
>>42075368Yes yes I'm sure you think being malnourished is the same as being feminine
>>42075388part of the defining features of female pattern gene expression is skeletal underdevelopment
>>42075254Good, start with yourself.
>>42075410malnourished males are not females or anything close.
>>42075450how about genetically compromised males? how about males for whom womb hormonal milieu was not as it should have been? are males platonically instantiated by forces that transcend gene expression?
>>42075226Do people actually use this to argue against trannies in sports?>hormones did it>larger people have larger hearts wow>hormones did it>hormones did it>primarily impacts injury rate
>>42075650it's interesting metabolic things (which are very hormone driven) aren't discussed at all. it doesn't matter how big my heart is if my blood counts are doomed to be below male ranges.I am not sure if this graphic is intended to be anti-trans or just about sex differences-if the former it's dishonest to take cis male/female comparisons and apply them uncritically
>>42075226i lost an arm wrestle to a pre t ftm thats shorter than me (im 5'5 they are like 5'3)
>>42075067My cis gf is now stronger than me, that is probably due to me wasting away in the hospital after srs but still, 2.5y on hrt and a cis woman who doesn't work out is undeniably stronger than me
