its because its part of the conservative mindset. the LGB can fit within the republican ideals because they are just sexuality instead of any sort of identity. However the T+ deal heavily in progressive identity and destroying cultural norms that the conservatives desire to uphold.

I also want to follow up why would you try to side with people who want you dead.

>>42096697
Because trans people are the conservatives' omelas child at the moment

>>42097915
There's some trannies that desire to be trad wives tho

>>42096697
>why are there no big-lgbt conservative accounts
>no, not like that
the t+ is a deal breaker, and not just for "conservatives".

>>42097918
>want you dead
classic projection
unless by "dead" you mean "not a veil predatory weirdoes can hide behind in the name of inclusivity"

>>42097943
I do but contemporary conservatism is not the way to do that. Conservatives, in general, have no desire to ever let me fulfill that ideal.

File: IMG_7170.jpg (148 KB, 1047x1209)

148 KB JPG

>>42096697
Conservative = traditional family = Anti-gay

If you dont get this through your skull you're a drooling retard, gays will never be welcome

>>42097949
>"Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life in its entirety."
>"Trans people cannot be victims of genocide because they are not a legitimate category of being."
ok bud
Maybe when they stop trying to make laws that makes being a tranny in public a sex crime
Maybe when they stop trying to ban transition care
Maybe when they stop trying to make public life less accessible to us

>>42097944
>the t+ is a deal breaker, and not just for "conservatives".
thats because anything T+ has become a giant red flag on the level of the nosering theory. While there might be good T+ people they are so heavily overshadowed by the annoying loud ones most people want nothing todo with them.

g and l is just a cucked t that doesn't wanna rock the boat. normos say hey you gotta adhere to hetero gender expression rules even tho youre not hetero, g and l are the ones that accept the deal, oh don't ask don't tell see we facade as hetero. So much of g and t is just based around not wanting to offend old stubborn heteros who don't wanna acknowledge homosexuality exists

>>42097964

More like why cant you control your own side better and keep them from killing kirk and causing scenes in public. We wouldnt need to create so many laws/rules if there werent so many bad apples.

>>42097964
on both accounts, you're wrong due to dishonesty or incompetence; i'm not even going to get whether these two are proper representations of conservative thought:

γένος = nation, race, kind, offspring
it's mostly a matter of ethnicity (sometimes conflated with culture/religion), not mental illness umbrella, hence genocide doesn't apply.
it's just a way for professional victims to claim the pinnacle of victimhood for the greatest estimated return.

"public life" is not "life in general" and even your alarmist framing ("eradicated") cannot divert from this.

>>42097999
>killing kirk
>it was a cis dude
Why can't you control your people, bro?

>>42098003
public life is only like 90% of what people do, and genocide applies to cultural groups as well

Both of these are quotes from the same dude btw

>>42097992
thats how it started but now post gamergate and kirk a lot of LGBs dont want to even touch the T+ because of the optics.

>>42098004
true I will ced that the killer was cis, but that still doesn't change the fact that he was radicalized.

>>42098017
>radicalized
>incomprehensible internet centrism
why are trannies being blamed for yet another cissoid's assassination?

>>42098013
it's not literal life, so nobody wants anyone dead.
90% is a nonsense number, but since it suits your point, you'll use it.
this leads me to believe you don't really have anything honest or of value to contribute.
thank you.

>>42098033
>we only want you to not exist in public life
>it's not literal death it's just barring you from employment, housing, healthcare etc
You are an amoeboid

>>42098023
Because trannies or even furries always seem to be somehow connected.

>>42098043
if trannies could learn to dress within some level of thier own passing ability, I don't think people would mind them in public as much. Remember the rule of thumb, if you cant pull off the outfit you probably shouldn't be wearing it.

>>42098058
>it's the fucking hon's fault and every other tranny should suffer because of them
retardation

>>42098049
>"always connected"
>looks inside
>It's blood libel
Every time there's a shooting or something people will immediately lie about it being a tranny

Every single time

>>42098069
welcome to reality, it's the same reason why we lost access to certain candies because kids kept choking on toys. To many stupid people ruin it for everyone else.

>>42098076
Except kids choking on toys is hazardous. A tranny being cringe in public doesn't actually hurt anyone, and the goal is to persecute them not to promote public welfare.

>>42098082
They are perceived as hazardous to the public. The persecution is reactionary and caused by the public seeing many cases of trans doing stupid shit in public. However, they do want to promote public welfare but It's for the public not the percent that are trans or trans allies. Because there are more straight normative people than trannies, and trying to constantly bend to the whims of the minority is no longer paying public optic dividends.

Plus, trannies no longer have the allure of being an exotic well-defined small minority. As stupid as it is, the public understands that the only thing stopping someone from "becoming" trans is going to the government and getting their legal papers changed.

Eg John could become Alice tomarrow without warning. And such a change can and has been grinding the gears of those who wish to publicly accept trans people.

>>42098123
>absolutely cripples public services
nice promoting of public welfare

>>42098123
Implying trans rights contradicts the interests of the public is... a choice
Saying the Republican party has the interests of the public in mind is just funny

>>42096697
gay dude, kinda right wing - https://x.com/DisaffectedPod

gay right wing journo (but in Swedish) - https://x.com/ROGSAHL

David Boas at CATO institute is also gay.

Jessica Reidl - https://x.com/JessicaBRiedl (standard right-wing economimst, not necessarily Republican; federal budget economist)

It depends on what you mean by "big" though.
I generally don't follow people based on one single opinion. Probably comes with age too.

t. right-wing tranny

>>42096697
Republicans run on wedge issues to keep their base engaged. At the moment gay people stopped being the focused wedge issue cus they lost the marriage campaign so they switched to protect rhe children and sports from trans.

The only real issue gay conservatives have thrown all of their weight behind since Obergefell is the "LGB without the T"/Gays against Groomers culture war. I'd suggest you start there