The only way to save trans people is for a string of incredibly charismatic, attractive, no-controversy mtfs and ftms to enter the public spotlight.
>>42100532>no-controversdefine this
>>42100532>no-controversybeing trans is controversial by default tho, how is that supposed to work?
>>42100532>no-controversy>transpick one retard
They already somewhat exist, celebrity black people have existed since Jim Crow and reconstruction and it didn't stop oppression. What would help is if queer people didn't constantly devolve into shitty gatekeeping infighting and the only way to do that is kill all the Blanchardite HUSSTUSS faggots who should literally rope themselves for everyone's benefit.
>>42100582>>42100612I think OP means no rape allegations, no skeletons in the closet. Squeaky clean past like Lebron James
i don't think it'll work in the current political climate, they'll just make something up. how about we do the opposite - find the most deranged problematic person with inexplicably high charisma and let her/him/them/it/star throw slurs at cissoids on air. either we win other the averager repressed viewer or lgbt reputation finally hits rock bottom. either way can't be that bad
>>42100723We need a lebron for trans people yes
We need trans people who pass, which rules out 99% of them including honter, h0nn, and blair whonteThey need to be strictly androphilic too
>>42101513or gynephillic in the case of trans men
>>42102038The public doesn't need to know about ftmsThe public hates the thought of reducing the number of womenThe public is fine with the thought of reducing the number of girly gay men
There are plenty of these. You and most people simply don't care about them because they are boring and uncontroversial
Cissy bootlicker opticsfag the cissoids won't like us if were hot enough
>>42100723is calling a black friend (established, still friend) "nigger" on purpose, several times, a controversy?
