I've realized now that sexuality is simply a way of pacifying and controlling the populace. This is most obvious in "deviant" sexualities like yours, but it's also used on heterosexuals. If young people were pointing their sexual urge towards family formation, would people really be so accepting of every degradation and disgrace foisted upon them? This board, one of the most sexualized out there, is full of low-agency, depressive, disorganized people. People are less healthy, birthrates are tanking, everything is getting more expensive, there is NO culture, there is NO society. And people are placated with their pornography, hookups, and, television, while their countries are being RAPED. Fight while you still can.
>>42139338>And le Sex, it really is an awful thing, I tell you. I am telling you thatFor real sounds true but might be brainrot, I am inclined to believe it and swallow such a load
>>42139352Since the 1960s people have become freer and freer to pursue whatever sexual escapades strike their fancies. Are they healthier? Are the birthrates stable? Are people happy? Is dating easier? You need to think on a systems level; treat society as an engineering problem. Don't think on an individual scale, think on a mass scale.
>>42139338okay
It might do that as a side effect but sexuality is definitely a naturally emergent phenomenon and it predates society.
>>42139338>fight while you still can>by producing more mindless slaves for worklol christfags are funny
>>42140434Retard
