I've realized now that sexuality is simply a way of pacifying and controlling the populace. This is most obvious in "deviant" sexualities like yours, but it's also used on heterosexuals. If young people were pointing their sexual urge towards family formation, would people really be so accepting of every degradation and disgrace foisted upon them? This board, one of the most sexualized out there, is full of low-agency, depressive, disorganized people. People are less healthy, birthrates are tanking, everything is getting more expensive, there is NO culture, there is NO society. And people are placated with their pornography, hookups, and, television, while their countries are being RAPED. Fight while you still can.
>>42139338>And le Sex, it really is an awful thing, I tell you. I am telling you thatFor real sounds true but might be brainrot, I am inclined to believe it and swallow such a load
>>42139352Since the 1960s people have become freer and freer to pursue whatever sexual escapades strike their fancies. Are they healthier? Are the birthrates stable? Are people happy? Is dating easier? You need to think on a systems level; treat society as an engineering problem. Don't think on an individual scale, think on a mass scale.
>>42139338okay
It might do that as a side effect but sexuality is definitely a naturally emergent phenomenon and it predates society.
>>42139338>fight while you still can>by producing more mindless slaves for worklol christfags are funny
>>42140434Retard
Boys age 17-21 are obsessed with reproducing. After that people slowly reakize there's more to life and we have enough people already.
>>42140988Tell that to brownoids
>>42139338Counterpoint: Our rich pedophile overlords want you to keep producing serfs to work as forever slaves, and maybe a sacrifice to their pedophile friends. Also, the world is cursed; life is always filled with desire and therefore: pain.
>>42139338>This board... is full of low-agency, depressive, disorganized people.I'm now wondering whether people like you have spent so much time engaging on boards other than /pol/, and so little time actually browsing /pol/, that you've lost sight of much /pol/ itself embodies these three qualities. Seriously, it's like objectively negative personality traits are never considered a problem whenever they're coming from an alt-rightoid. Stop ignoring/giving your own these free passes.
>>42139338> If young people were pointing their sexual urge towards family formation, would people really be so accepting of every degradation and disgrace foisted upon them?...and while you're blaming /lgbt/ for corrupting the human sex drive, why don't you take at how often your boy James Cantor's name pops up in this reckoning of researchers denying the link between porn use and sexual dysfunction?https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/pro-porn-science-alliance/>James Cantor tried to testify against transgender care for teenagers>he also is an advocate for his mentor's (Ray Blanchard) AGP/HSTS typology.
>>42139338>realises that 'sexuality' only exists to herd the populace toward certain economic realities>proceeds to spout tradcon copehuh?
>>42139338>If young people were pointing their sexual urge towards family formation, would people really be so accepting of every degradation and disgrace foisted upon them?My parents did that. And then they did accept me as tranny.And that was long before "deviant" was cool and politically correct.Now I'm the elder tranny that helps with the education of my brother's kids.You may not like to hear this, but this board is not exactly representative. Just like /pol/ is not representative of the right wing.
