Currently it appears I am the only (human) on earth privy to this information. Yes it came to me in a dream, but it is true and you will see why if you read until the end. Reading this post will change you for the rest of your life, you will awaken. 1. Their a.i capabilities are 10 years ahead of what we've seen2. They can retroactively edit the internet, ex: you're on youtube, video pops up that says its 7 years old, its some pretty neat music, or so you think. The video was in fact only created and released 1 month ago via a.i, the 7 years claim is only to claim authenticity, for what purpose?3. They create, and also re release existing songs but insert subliminal tones into the music, certain beats (vibrations) that have been algorithmicly designed to enchant and shape you, why?4. They are rewriting your soul, why?5. Project rewrite, thats what its called, its a global underground conspiracy to ensure humans are ready for the next project, im not privy to the next project but its likely not great. 6. I can not be your leader, sorry. Nor can i even be your ally or supporter To truly oppose this project is death simply put. I can not oppose it. But i am already to be dead, so all i can do is essentially throw this information into the air like a flare and if anyone sees it and is awakened, i can at least die knowing the flame of humanity will go on a bit longerGood luck
>>42146588most based poster keeps it up ily
>>42146588>2. They can retroactively edit the internet, ex: you're on youtube, video pops up that says its 7 years old, its some pretty neat music, or so you think. The video was in fact only created and released 1 month ago via a.i, the 7 years claim is only to claim authenticity, for what purpose?I 100% believe this. There are 10+ year old videos from BBC archive which seem to be AIs rewriting history and are eerie. For instance interviews with kids in the 1960s talking about modern AI.
>>42146588>Reading this post will change you for the rest of your life, you will awaken.can someone who kept reading tell me if its worth it
>>42146588>Their a.i capabilities are 10 years ahead of what we've seenThis will probably happen just as AIs get better they can do more work in a day. If an AI was human level and could be run on one GPU you could just give it more GPUs and have it run 10 years in a day or w/e
>>42146808it’s so to rewrite your soul it’s worthy as much as anything go crazy lil anon
>>42146808it is.>>42146798What videos? I've found a BBC special on Neanderthals very different from the one I remembered seeing in the 2010s>>42146588Go on...Could it be the neo-gnostics were right and reality is a tightly controlled archon gangster scheme?
Can we keep the schizo stuff contained to >>>/b/ or maybe >>>/x/ ? I'm sure >>>/g/ would appreciate this post too.
just wait until you hear about retcons
>>42146839These two videos but especially the first one:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS8xX3usi4chttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih3LDRuup2sFirst in particular is very ai centric in a modern sense.
>>42146931Wait rewatched, the actual 1966 one is meh but the clips they show of the 1966 one at the beginning of the 1986 one is mega bad vibes
>>42146588mikasa :)
