this is what transgender people look like In real life
>>42156936why r u creeping on someone?
>>42156949cuz trannies insist trannies look like women irl but they fuckin' don't
>>42156936>everyone is old and white with bad fashionWhere do you live where people overwhelmingly look like this? The UK?
>>42156974in high school i had a friend who looked exactly like this and was like 6'7leave the poor long-haired dude alonetaking photos of strangers in public makes YOU look like the weird one
>>42156974so much sexxxx
>>42157002>6'7Genuinely kek'd holy shit I hate being a brainlet. I can't take this shit anymore.
>>42156974
>>42157032i don't think he ever wanted to troon are we really back at "long hair = girl"?
>>42157048The post you are replying to is referencing the viral "6 7" meme
>>42156974That's just a dude
>>42156936>>42156974y'all need to stop being weirdos, not every tranny claims to look like a woman so don't lump em all together, also stop taking pictures of randoms, maybe they don't even give af about passing or aren't even trans
>>42156974would
>>42157048I'm not transphobic, I was just caught off guard by the 67
>>42156974Brah he just looks like a grunge fan
>>42157086>>42157127ohdidnt even think about it, i just estimated his height and it happens to be something like that
>>42156936taking pictures of random people on the street is pretty weird
>>42156936>>42156974>IRL transgender people look like they're minding their own business but get targetted by harassment anywayUnironically true.
this is what femboys look like in real life
>>42157406the fat one forced off to the side
>>42157406why cant femboys dress fem in a way that isnt thigh high socks and a skirt? why is there no sundress femboys. i want sundress femboys
>>42157406don't see the problem here
Girls on film (Two minutes later)Girls on film(Still got your picture)Girls on film
>>42156936>>42156974>>42157478I'm gonna give it like 12 months before we find out anon murdered one of these people
>>42156936I love how people think having a camera means they somehow can never be in the wrong. Like we're just supposed to agree with you because you showed us an picture/video of someone elses face instead of your ugly mug.
>>42157478pretty I wish I could date a girl like that, looks like she is with someone though
>>42157478she's cute. extremely weird and creepy to take and keep pictures of her or any other stranger. that's psycho behavior
Is Alex Consani not real?
>>42156936This is why I hate you people so much. You never see gay men posting ugly pictures and saying this is what gay men look like
bruh tf you taking pictures of people for. that's some fucked up shit. leave them alone.
Was this thread made by a repper? Where does this obsession with ugly transgender people come from?
>>42157677most of them r probably not reppers. some people just dont have hobbies or just stuff going on in general so they take pictures of strangers to send to other people on the internet
>>42157039This is like the zoomer version of using an informal fallacy like a formal one because you don't understand what you're doing. The thing with the planes is that they sent out a set number of planes and got a different number back. You get the bad result when you ignore the planes that don't come back, but you know that the planes that didn't come back exist, so it's good data that you're just overlooking. With clocking trannies, we run into some number of clocky trannies. That's all the information we have. To jump either to the conclusion that this means all or most trannies are clocky OR that actually you're looking over some significant number of unclockable trannies both require a leap in logic that aren't supported by evidence. Really, I'm being nice because I want to come off like an autist, not a transphobe. You can't just pull out survivorship bias like a trump card (thus the informal/formal fallacy comparison); you actually have to provide convincing evidence that the bias is being used.
>>42157877I don't think there's a good meme graphic for the toupee fallacy, hence why the survivorship fallacy image gets used instead.
>>42157877Good postI aspire to have the energy to articulate myself like this whenever I see stupid shit online
>>42157906I'm all sperged out, but the toupee fallacy still isn't good for what pro-trans people want to do. If I say all toupees are shit, you take me to the toupee store. If I'm a dick, I get to the store and say it's an outlier, and that actually most toupees are shit. We're right back in he said/she said land. What if the transphobe backs off from saying you can always tell to saying you can usually tell? What if you want to argue you usually can't tell rather than just claiming that who knows how often you can tell? Then you actually need to bring forth evidence of some notable group of passoids, which no one ever does in a way that's any more convincing than the evidence the transphobes bring to the table. My sincere opinion is that my opinion on trans people doesn't turn on whether they pass. They could all be bricks, and I'd still care about them. I don't know how many of them pass. But I also know that I can't really make claims about how many of them pass beyond "some of them.">>42157933Thanks, but no you don't lmao
