in your opinion, what is the best political ideology for tranny rights?
>>42158184democratic socialists
Neocon for HSTSes
>>42158184authoritarian left; democratic socialists will never have the balls to go after the people who hate transgender people with the weapons of the state like an authleft would.
>>42158184I am a Liberal
>>42158184
>>42158184Georgism
for me, its Eco fascism
>>42158184i know the most autistic, so maybe it's the most trans compliant
>>42158877this image depicted a believable caricature until the part about trans fighter pilots...this image was manufactured by the CIA
>>42159129It's really funny tho
>>42158877Hypnosis is a government psyop and this is the result
>>42159145Worth a chuckle maybe. Or a dismissive scoff.
For trans people in general, probably the mamdami dsa kind of social democracyFor trannies on this board, ancap and market anarchism.Personally I'm a union critical syndicalist
>>42159254union critical? You mean you don't like organized crime?
>>42159266Nah I love it
>>42158184i dont think theres a set ideology that would aid trannies the most (or aid anyone for that matter) since from what ive seen, all ideologies have major flaws, no matter which way they lean.however, i think tranny liberation is gonna go way better under more individualistic ideologies, since being a tranny is a very self-serving endeavor. i think libertarianism has some good ideas but again, there's nothing *really* stopping someone from killing a tranny because they are a tranny + lack of government intervention making it all the more easier.i dont think economy plays a big role in tranny rights, economy only shapes living conditions and not how people see others. i genuinely have no clue why there are so many communist trannies, as if anything trannies will only be oppressed under it.then again, i dont really agree with any real politics I've heard and just live by a slightly altered version of what Nietzche and Stirner wrote about.being a tranny isn't a political thing. its an extension of existentialist ideas.
>>42158184ultra far right ultra far libertarian
>>42158184I'm right wing libertarian.Without capitalism, lack of regulation (or accessible way to work around retarded state regulation) and free trade, I would've never been able to troon out and become a passoid.Without capitalism and explicit anti-union and anticommunist government in my country, I would've never been able to make the money to be able to afford my transition.Also, right wing libertarianism being individualist fits me very well. I don't have to care what other people think just like they don't have to care what I think.Sure, it also helps that I don't suffer from any other mental disorder and I enjoy being a functional adult. I don't melt when I'm insulted or misgendered (though that hasn't happened in my life for almost a decade now).For people (trannies included) who are high agency, right wing libertarianism is the best trade-off to be able to self-actualize.For low agency people, various forms of authoritarianism are more comfortable because they can't be bothered to become adults to begin with, let alone functional ones.
>>42159424>Without capitalism and explicit anti-union and anticommunist government in my country, I would've never been able to make the money to be able to afford my transition.hahahahahaha good one!
>>42159435But it's true.If I had been born in g*rmany I would've been hondosed best case scenario. After being kept 3+ years on a waiting list. And no option to go around it because 60%+ fiscal burden an retarded regulations even by shitlib standards.
>>42159456Which country are you from?
>>42159424>Without capitalism and explicit anti-union and anticommunist government in my country, I would've never been able to make the money to be able to afford my transition.nuclear trvke billions of commies must die
We need new politics, the political compass is a product of the left libertarian milieu and reflects exactly its failings.>>42158263Marxism leninism is an ideology for the 19th century. A shame we got it in the 20th. >>42159366Because trannies want free, expanded healthcare. The promise of social democracy and socialism is free deschamps braly for NEETs who can't handle the market.
what's right leaning economic policy? obviously tariffs have not been successful. they're not fiscally conservative as they continue to increase the deficit. their fiscal spending does not lesson the economic strain on the common man. groceries have continued to go up. they didn't extend aca subsidaries. healthcare going up too! what is their economic policy? please someone explain to me how the number of business bankruptcies and property closures we've seen is indicitive of a healthy economy. farmers got fucked. small rural towns with a single tyson factory that basically employed everyone? shutdown. town's fucked. your argument can't be well they need to move to a more populated area to survive. that doesn't work when you give them no assistance out of their situation. that's assuming they want to leave. many may not because of their own innate prejudices. i still think you should take care of them, that's a left leaning approach. the right's idea is just let them fail and die off. cut them off. it's harsh. if trying to get them to go outside and exercise isn't combatting diabetes rates, then maybe we need to have harsher regulations on sugar in foods by putting caps on things with regular fda testing.
>>42159477Mussolini said start with keynes.
>>42159487if #2 is investment in government infrastructure, gutting the department of education undermines your point as to their current principles
>>42159477What do you mean by right-wing? People like Thomas Sowell love free trade in all cases. Trump is a socialist who hates free markets and loves state-backed cronies.
>>42159560Not sure what you mean by #2 but I don't think you understand what I mean at all
>>42159462Yes, of course nona, I will tell you my original country which then makes it super easy to dox me.How about no?
>>42159808I can barely figure out how to run python scripts from the command line and you think I can dox you? I'm just trying to figure out which economy we're talking about when we say that anti-union action by the government contributed to higher wages? Unions specifically helped raise wages for plenty of workers in America throughout it's history.
>>42159808lmao
>>42159863Unions are literally organized crime.A civilized society treats them accordingly: with bullets, jail time, social exclusion, economic sanctions and more bullets.The cartels also "raise wages" in LatAm. That's why LatAm is mostly shithole countries. The only economic growth is in capitalist regimes that actively fight unions.The US is no different. Right-to-work states are superiour to unionized ones. It's not even a question.
>>42158184it's obviously communism qua the real movement everything else is hitlerite or at least latently hitlerite
>>42159944what the fuck are you talking about? The cartel doesn't organize workers; they bribe the security forces of local government by offering them a share of the profits gained from drug trade. What the fuck does that have to do with negotiating salaries as a group?
>>42158184as a leftie I'm tempted to say leftism to rep for my own team but the will of the people is largely the will of the cissoids and they don't like us a whole lot so leftism prolly not. I guess whatever the fuck Norway is doing?
>>42158184Marxism hands down trans people are scapegoated and targeted due to capitalisms faults and the LGBT as a whole will only be used as a tool by the rich.
>>42159944I think what bothers me the most about you types is the fact that when it comes to the right wing position that matters most, non intervention, all the reactionary tripe turns out to be a larp and youre just a neocon
>>42159424in a perfect world you would have gotten gender affirming care with a snap of a finger.
>>42160979I don't live in the US (thank God!). Believe it or not geopolitical autism isn't even on my radar. Besides, my country's military isn't big or relevant enough for this to even be a concern to begin with.You Americans have some really deep obsessions and you can't fathom that the rest of the world might actually not share them at all.burger neocons and evangelicals and leftoids all have an Israel obsession. Meanwhile we just... don't care? Visa restrictive policies for both the kikes and the savage kebabs and... that's it.burger rightoids have an unhealthy obsession with religion. Meanwhile, here, religion just... is. The state doesn't gaf either way. As it should be.burger gigacommies are obsessed with pronouns (after they moved on from jazz hands and trigger warnings, remember that?) while here that's considered ridiculous even by the gigacommies.You have more fundamental mental health problems as a nation, nona. All of your ideological communities/group have simply gone mad. And it's dangerous for all of us since we're all living in the Burger empire...
>>42161047If such technology is even possible, it will be attained through capitalism.Heck, DiY has gotten significantly better in the last 15 years since crypto allowed for the possibility of much freer trade and free flow of information./hrtgen/ now produces more quality data and advice than the top institutions in trans care science. That's the anarcho part of anarcho capitalism.The perfect world doesn't exist. And won't exist in our lifetimes. But this world is best perfectible through economic and social liberty, not through regulation and totalitarian surveillance and gatekeeping.
>>42161242Funny you should mention that. I have a good friend, a Russian, whose hatred of Americans seems to stem from the degree to how obsessed we all are with medical neurosis and identifying it.>Israel, religionnobody brought up these subjects but you. All just to miss the entire point of my post, the very burger empire justifies its imperialism with the exact way you think about the world, and you cannot even tell me why it is so bad because you've swallowed the exact slop rationalizations used to pretend the usa had no role in the destruction of the region.
>>42161343russians are subhuman, generally speaking.around my block we've known this since before the founding of the USAAgain, you burgers legit don't understand that the rest of the world exists and not every conflict is either your fault or your responsibility.
>>42161390Can you seriously think of no examples of >Americans think every conflict is your responsibilityFrom south America, your posts have too many words to pretending retarded
>>42161406>From south AmericaI'm in Europe lol. Will start work in 30 minutes.
>>42161260I was not talking about technology but a system. You retard in a perfect world all are able to be themselves and full control over their own bodies/lifes. Free healthcare for all. All taken care of. Only people are evil are oppressors who want to control other peoples bodies and think they are above others because some manmade paper and they decided it dictates who is more valuable. In the perfect world these psychos would not be in control of anything to oppress others like in the current world. In this world all of the fucking billionaires are literal transphobes. All would be educated in the perfect world know full truth about world most things being a spectrum. So the oppressors would not even exist. And if someone commits crime they are made through empathy training. Crime would be mostly solved cause no capitalism and all have their basic necessity's to exist. All made to benefit every one of us no left behind. That includes there would be no malicious forces against us try to for example prevent that trans care research you mentioned. I was speaking about a perfect world, and unfortunately we all exist in this cruelest system that should not exist.
>>42161417Reading comprehension because I am asking you to name examples of the zone of influence shit you mention, which I agree is a problem with usa foreign policy as well. And asking if you are actually retarded enough to think this somehow doesn't apply to latam. I knew you are European as you are not familiar with the region. You probably could not even tell me what the monroe doctrine is in spite of it being the primary example of what you are talking about.
liberalism>>42158877 is correctsocialists are sometimes pro-trans but overall liberalism creates far better lives for trans people
>>42159424>I'm right wing libertarian.>Without capitalism, lack of regulation (or accessible way to work around retarded state regulation) and free trade, I would've never been able to troon out and become a passoid.>Without capitalism and explicit anti-union and anticommunist government in my country, I would've never been able to make the money to be able to afford my transition.>Also, right wing libertarianism being individualist fits me very well. I don't have to care what other people think just like they don't have to care what I think.all of what you described is compatible with left-wing liberalism, depending on a few different definitions. even economically-left liberalism can be compatible with this
>>42161487left-wing liberalism thinks I'm a traitor because I married a man.practical left-wing liberalism brought onerous regulation on trans care everywhere it gained power in Europe (worst examples being UK and g*rmany, but also Sweden more recently).fundamentally, leftism is incompatible with individualist self-actualization. Sure, it may like me as a tranny, but it won't like me as a high-earning tranny. It will want to keep on increasing my fiscal burden and try its best to stop me from keeping money abroad to avoid leftist theft/taxation.sorry, no dice.
>>42161514>left-wing liberalism thinks I'm a traitor because I married a man.I don't know what the hell that is but that's not left-wing liberalism, that's not even marxism/socialism/communism (and I hate those things). that's like tumblrism or somethingin america "left-wing" is kind of used differently than in europe. but my point is there are jigsaw puzzle combinations of "left" and "liberal" that fit you, at least by american standards. you seem like you are basically socially center-left, economically centrist or center-right, and philosophically liberal. in america among the educated this is just called "liberal". there are also "left-liberal" constructs that are compatible, where corporate regulation and taxation is minimal, but relatively high income tax brackets (with progressive taxes, so only the very wealthy really are hit by it, and only on the bucket of money above the threshold) are used to help the poor, which is a mix of economic rightism and leftism
>>42158263go authleft and have fun getting your country destroyed.
>>42159380ThisMetal Gear type micronation with nuclear-backed guaranteed sovereignty, but instead of being a mercenary army for hire, it's an OnlyFans page a GDP of $34 Billion.
>>42161540>you seem like you are basically socially center-leftI guess. Not a big fan of drug legalization though. I also think marriage itself (for everyone) ought to be privatized (it'd fix all controversies and get the state further away from our lives).>economically centrist or center-rightI'm economically far-right, actually. By Europe standards. By US standards I guess somewhere between Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedman. As policy, I like Javier Milei, ofc.>and philosophically liberalUp to a point, yes. But liberal in a more classical sense. Which includes things like freedom of association for real (no "civil rights act" type of shit, no affirmative action).>but relatively high income tax brackets (with progressive taxes, so only the very wealthy really are hit by it, and only on the bucket of money above the threshold)Yeah, you see, I absolutely disagree with that in its entirety.First of all because that's ALWAYS a slippery slope. Federal income tax in your lands started like that: "don't worry peasants, it's only the ultra rich and it's just 1%" - and within two generations it became almost anyone productive.I also disagree philosophically. I believe most poor people are poor because of their own fault. And the few that aren't because of their own fault can easily be taken care of via private charity.I volunteer for a private non-profit clinic offering care to Alzheimer patients with no family. I also donate about €5000/yr to it as well. If you know anything about median incomes in Europe, from this alone you can gauge that I'm not joking about being high-earning.Anyway, I gotta get to work. See you around. Or not.
>>42161622>I believe most poor people are poor because of their own fault.even if that is true, that doesn't mean they shouldn't be helpedplus it probably isn't true. it's possibly largely due to genetics, and one cannot control their own genes
>>42158184pic related
>>42158184I don't know. I'm somewhere between classical and social liberalism.I want the government to provide healthcare and regulate predatory corporations, but outside of that I just want to be left alone for the most part.
>>42161720>center right is pro trans>but libcenter isn'tlmao even
>>42161720rare honest representation coming from a leftist
>>42161720What about authoritarian left But we elect a transfem leader?
>>42161799>turns out to be a bitterhon
>>42161807passoids and youngshits straight to the gulag, mandatory FMS for female cissoids
Transgender National Socialism is the only way to secure the existence of our people and a future for trans children
