>>42163057
Idk much about politics but I think most of these guys are lying

>>42163064
elaborate

>>42163057
they're not planning to abuse their child, so they don't need to hide the evidence
also what kind of answer is "I would be pleased for my son to be gay", can a brit explain why the greens are so weird

>>42163057
Im not British summon the British trannies to answer

>>42163087
Like they'd disapprove but they don't want to admit that

>>42163099
they would be pleased to have a token child
>my son is gay and i'm fully accepting of him, i'm such a good parent

>>42163099
It's how "how would you feel if your child came out as gay"
so I'm interpreting pleased as "happy they'd trust me enough to be honest with me"

>>42163102
the answer is almost certainly the fact that labour is the default pick for first generation muslim immigrants regardless of social class or political leanings as they're mostly single issue voters who only care about immigration rights.

conservatives and reform both want the UK out of the ECHR so they can start aggressively deporting refugees and illegal migrants, labour is the only significant party that doesn't take this stance.

>>42163103
agreed

>>42163057
>ywn have grandkids
if you aren't at least a little bummed about that, you're a weird parent

>>42163119
first and second generation immigrants*
also if this is based on how people voted back in 2024 then it probably includes a lot of socially conservative but economically socialist voters who thought that labour would ignore inflation and take out loans to further increase social spending

it's genuinely depressing how islamic fundamentalists are genuine force to be reckoned with British politics

buckle up UK troons, if we're lucky we'll have a transpositive ayatollah ^^ (although most migrants are from Pakistan and Bangladesh which are Sunni so probably not)