Previous Thread:>>42183205
Life is hard as a rice chasing bottom...
FIRST FOR BAVARIA!!
>>42184913why does this exact pairing happen so much across gender and sexuality
>>42184918>>42184919AAAAASHOOOOOOLE
>>42184913all asians to me are bug gender
>>42184923you know why
>>42184944no I really want to knowcan yellowpilled fags please respond
>>42184948because they look like androg children?
>>42184948Asians are the only race who recognize whites as the most excellent race. So they try to emulate whites and interbreed with them.
>>42184913>>42184866Okay so I took the time to parse this totally-not-rambling textwall essay...re: >It seems that if you encourage males to play with dicks all day, their own or someone elses, they eventually go a bit mad either way and become of less use to their social group>If it was a quote you didn't make it obvious, and you're so verbose I doubt that nuance would escape your massive intellect.Perhaps you are right because there is no way I can find any connection between these statements.Second, I happen to track language and idioms closely because language tells us how people are thinking. And I think the various words that people have used to describe changing ideas about "homsexuality" tell us things. So the idea that straights called "gays" youthful sprites that grant wishes is interesting. I think that observation stands on its own. If you have no curiosity why 'straights' would call 'gays' "fairies" then you are simply an uncurious person.>It implies that there was no precipitating force that caused gays to organize and build communities, and like there is no antagonistic force maintaining that status quo now.This was the most interesting statement, even if it seems to misunderstand what I am saying...
>>42184983and whites like asians because... they're narcissists?
>>42185023...Yes, indeed there were forces. But I suspect there is a great deal of inaccuracy about what they were and whence they emanated, and for whom.Neither loud homosexuality nor loud homophobia were the norm, right up until suddenly they were. That means there was a catalyst. Something changed, and I think its worth examining to determine what it was. It wasnt that cocksuckers suddenly had a new wave of antagonism that sprung from seemingly nowhere. Gays have dealt with literal purges before. So a few bible waving loonies would not have been enough to instigate all of sex lib in the sixties. You are either serious about peeling that onion to find the core or you arent and are satisfied with whatever mainstream history fed you. And if so, fine. But you dont have to come after people who think on these things to defend your neatly installed worldviews.Im sorry, friend. But I have been around for a while watching this evolve. And I am telling you that I know from personal observation that the idea of "gay rights" has changed greatly over decades. I think it began by attracting some people who had legitimate grievances in the culture. But it did certainly get hijacked, and what we have now is not what it began as. So it is not obvious to me that it continues to serve the best interests of gays, especially young ones, or more importantly to me, young men of any description whatsoever.Do not forget; I have been watching what the last generation of gays have been feeding the next generation of gays for several generations. And I am here to tell you that its not going well. Depression. Suicide. Mental illness, self mutilation, drug abuse. All spiking.Something is wrong, and its not straights that are doing it. They have their own culture problems.
laitno bottom x white top
The Dan roast from last thread was hilarious to read
>>42184923Why do posters here hate asians so much. You can post the most vile black fetish images all day and receive positive feedback but if you have to see an asian with a white man it makes you angry.
>>42185754I don't hate asians and I don't mind that people like/date asians, I'm just curious why both straight and gay white men seek out submissive asian partners
