Why does /lgbt/ get so offended when you suggest that "AGP" and "meta-attraction" are actually just expressions of default female sexuality?
>>42194597Because trannies are ontologically evil and we have to pathologize and demonize them at every opportunity, duh
>>42194601but everyone here is a fucking tranny!
>>42194626.. who hates themselves
>>42194597trans women here can't stand the implication that they're actually women. really makes you think huht. mtf
>>42194664how does agp, a fetish that makes men aroused at the thought of being women, make someone a woman?
>>42194626No it's like 60% chuds now
>>42194718because thats largely how cis women operate too. consider fifty shades of grey as posted by op. its one of the best selling book series EVER. all the sex scenes are all about how the girl, Ana feels. the titular christian grey barely exists in the sex scenes, his role is about as important as that of a dildo. clearly the same "autogynephilia" and "meta-attraction" is every bit as present in cis women as it is in the icky agp trannies.
>>42194734so am i, a man with agp, a woman?
>>42194741there is more to gender than sexuality, but in the context of sexuality, yes, you essentially are a woman, congratulations.
>>42194718on its own in a vacuum? it doesn't.
>>42194597Default female sexuality is to be gynephilic bisexual that experiences comp het
