Do men really think that grotesquely large breasts like this are actually attractive???
There's nothing grotesque about that holy moly!
men are attracted to women who look so extreme they barely seem human anymore. need i explain why?
>>42234802think you got your answer op
>>42234802It looks like a hentai page that was made photorealistic with AI
>>42234781they suit the rest of her frame, it would be weird with small tits but that fat ass and thighs
>>42234818they are gay
As opposed to a tranny? Yes.
>>42234781i dont know, i find men utterly bizarre the way they think, despite being one. i think women are very beautiful but their bodies look deformed when their boobs are that big, i think its very sad
Imagine being part of a sexual minority population and still suffer from sexual solipcism.
>>42234993Do you like pussy? I bet you don't.>>42234818She just looks fertile and thick, seethe more faggot. And before you say I have a breeding fetish, I like trannies too beauty has more than 1 form.
>>42234781I don't understand this. She looks like a cow.t. cis L
>grotesquely large
Seems to work proportionally with everything else I mean
>>42235026i used to be very attracted to girls yes and i still am somewhat but i think i feel so alienated by the sexual world and how people talk about it i kinda cant even answer the question. the whole male thing about 'getting pussy' is just pretty gross
It's face > ass > thighs > feet > tits anything else is larp.
>>42234993Her boobs are large but still look round and firm and are in perfect harmony with her large thighs which together form a desired hourglass shape.What do you mean by 'deformed'? Do you know what that word means? She is literally made out of round curves as if her body was constructed by Thales of Miletus himself.
Breasts like that are the female equivalent of a man who looks like this
>>42235079that's the tranny chain of demands
>>42235097deformed as in the size of her breasts are causing her constant back pain, the entire contour of her body is just defined by her tits, anyone who looks at her will just see that first because its so out of proportion. it makes me sad to see a person who is basically jsut being reduced to their sexual assets, but i guess we are all dirty monkeys at the end of the day, things like grace, beauty. they arent as stimulating as the monkey stuff to most male "humans"
>>42235143also an absolutely disgusting monstrosity
>>42235062Lol, lmao, I didn't mention getting pussy. Do you ever find pussies attractive and want to lick and fuck them? What does your gut say, and don't dance around the question you fucking effete
>>42235171I don't think you know what the word proportion means. Proportion is a ratio and her tits have great proportion with regards to her wide face and her thighs.Sexuality isn't a bad thing buddy.
>>42235171>they arent as stimulating as the monkey stuff to most male "humans"Don't be so hard on yourself...
>>42235097>Thales of MiletusThales was a philosopher, not a sculptor, dummy
>>42234781>Do men really think that grotesquely large breasts like this are actually attractive???Not that large
Crazy that we are being told that modern society is being ruled by heteronormative dating standards, yet this is what 99% of hetero men would consider way above average yet advertising, acting and modeling is dominated by stick-figure and androgynous body shapes selected by the same 5 homosexual ceos and corporate owners.
>>42235196i mean, sure? its more all the stuff around that whole concept that puts me off
>>42235221philosopher and mathematician who came up with many mathematical concepts relating to circles and curves, so constructing in this context relates to pure geometry, not sculpting, dumbass.
>>42235284Who cares about you being a little sex-negative puritan bitch? You are in a place that is itself a product of human sexual liberatory movements.
>>42235247>implying there are no women in advertising >implying Jewish ceos hold a gun to every woman's head Retard. Nobody wants to look like your hyper porn comic books, just chill.
>>42235285Alright, conceded.
>>42235296lol im not a puritan, i just think you have shit taste.women are hot when they are slim elven goddesses. not fat cows, thats just depressing. imagine your body only existing so men could go ooga booga instead of being a testament to the eternal beauty
>>42235322>I am not Puritan, I am just writing sex-negative rants on an anonymous internet forumlmao
>>42235245yes, yesagreedI only like the upper natural limit for tranny boob volume, not these real woman cows
>>42235247Well those homosexuals are just correct, the type of women you are describing are way more attractive than whatever this is...
>>42235396>more sexual solipcismBoring
>>42234781As long as they're shapely, yes.
>>42234781Anon it’s fine that you’re small chested but it’s like extremely gross to say she’s deformed, like get off your body shaming high horses
>>42235418It's just a sour grapes tranny and gayden dysphoria reminder thrashing thread
>>42234781Tbh Ive had a long running theory that men have no upper end for stimulus where it becomes too much. This is why they ste more extreme with sexuality, and why their preferred dating age stays young girls even as they get old honestly would probably be below 18 if surveys went that low.
>>42234781Yes.Prime breeding form, Venusian beyond your comprehension. A body designed to trigger every breeding instinct in a man's body in spite of his better judgement.The reason most people here are disagreeing is self interest. Either they're flimsy twinks trying to pass their goods off as women, the people trying to fuck them and thus pandering, pooners who have dysphoria about it and gay men who don't care. So it's just the lesbians and bisexuals that would even be interested or honest about it and I find even a lot of lesbians don't really go in for the venus body so mostly just bisexuals. It's just the wrong crowd to ask.
yes, that's hot af.
>>42234802Depends on the whole body. Pic rel yes, but on a stick skinny body no. Proportionality matters
