I am God's strongest Trans Girl.Boymoders are loved by Christ.“The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for all who do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God."The Bible says nothing about gender dysphoria, my mental illness, and taking hormones to live a normal life.I am a boy! But my gender is female. My sex, male, and my presentation as a male (clothing), shall never be touched for I am at His mercy.
>>42271470>I am God's strongest Trans Girl.There's at least one stronger than you I'm sure>I am a boy! But my gender is female. So you're a woman, with a male body
god wants you to boymode don't ever forget that
>>42271470how tall are you>>42271497bitch
>>42271511Aah she said it! she said it! ^0^
>>42271497>There's at least one stronger than you I'm sureNo, I am God's strongest Boymoder!>So you're a woman, with a male bodyThat's not what I said. I'm a boymoder mtf.>>42271502Yes! God in his love and teaching made it clear. >>42271511I am 5"2!
The talmud said plenty about gender and it described 8 Mazal
Blessed thread. We are all equal under God. You are absolutely beautiful the way you are and God will always love you. Praise Christ. Amen.
>>42271543>5'2 I'm committing the sin of envy and jealousy so hard right now
>>42271511
>>42271577Being that short sucks so much>t. stopped gay shit
>>42271470God bless you, my sister, but I don’t think you’re reading Deuteronomy correctly. It’s okay to plant companion crops and mixed fibers too. Please go easy on yourself. The Lord loves you
>>42271470that's not what rosaries look like.
>>42271470are you interested in a completely nonsexual relationship with a masc heterosexual man?
>>42271470>The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a manThen why are you wearing boy clothes? >5 But some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up, saying, “It is necessary to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.”>6 Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter. 7 And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. 8 So God, who knows the heart, [a]acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, 9 and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. 10 Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? 11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus [b]Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they.”
>>42271824got the double sided rosary so i can halve my hail marys
>>42271858Christ is KingGod bless you anon t. catholic tranny
>>42271845two separate beds but same room. sleep over every night. think about it
>>42271470Where could I find a trad cath trans girl and lose my virginity with her?
>>42271858Love the sinner, hate the sinI don't support boymoders lifestyle choices but I and God will love them for the women they are
>>42273379No where! I will never have s*x. If they truly love God as I, they will abstain.
>>42271470>“The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for all who do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God."Who wrote seems to have something to confess!
mogs megod has punished me and lives to see my endless honboymoder life as his sitcom
I got vaginoplasty so now I'm female, as per rabbinic opinion.
>>42271470Is this picrel ai generated I can’t tell. it looks like my shitty boymoder art I feel like I’m schizophrenic
>>42271470> [citation needed]That paraphrased quote is old testament btw. Old testament also says not to eat pork, but Christians celebrate many holidays with ham. > Why?Because Jesus (new testament) said not to judge a man on what he put into his body, but on what he puts into this world. >.Citation on pork eating:“And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him; Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?" Gospel of Mark 7:18–19 Jesus on wearing womens clothing as a man:"But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold, they that wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses." Matthew 11:8 Jesus on bottom surgeries and taking HRT:“For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” Matthew 19:12Jesus on judging what a person wears (raiment):“Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?” Matthew 6:25Btw Jesus does go on in several quotes about men and women. Look them up yourself.The overall truthpill is:> homosexualityIs evil. Pure evil. From jesus viewpoint and old testament.> lesbianismNever mentioned DESPITE historical context it would absolutely have existed. The implication here is lesbian acts are like being left-handed or something. Its a thing, but neither holy nor evil.> crossdressing/HRT/affirming surgeries (trans)Accepted and atleast crossdressing should be celebrated on the level of eating pork.
>>42279370I question if this quote is from the modified bible from the late 1800s. I forget what it's called but there's judeo influences on bibles from that period
>>42271470your god is dead and your faith is death, cultist
>>42271470Put on a dress, I'm sure God wanted his beautiful warrior dressed in pretty clothes.
>>42279498Nope. Not at all. The oldest copy of the new testament is written in greek, and still understood today (if not better). It dates to 100-200years after Jesus's death. The bigger difficulty is historical context of things. For example, the bible says nothing about "HRT" nor "lesbians" but in context lesbianism absolutely would have existed, while HRT had never been discovered. So the absent mentions of lesbianism, paired with direct quotes about men with men and homosexuality, can be interpreted as it was understood but generally neutral or benign morally. While HRT and trans, morally needs to be drawn from implications and contexts. Given jesus says anyone can wear what they want without judgement, eunichs of any kind (birth, force, accident, self inflicted, choice) are valid so long as they accept jesus. That eunich quote further implies, that time period did have an understanding of gender vs sex, and that there is more than 2, as men and women are directly mentioned, with eunuch neither quoted as "male eunuch" nor "female eunuch" or some other modifier. Meaning to them, there is eunuchs (vague general non-procreating types), men and women. However men and women sex is the only virtuous act described. Meaning if you take all the implications in context:> man and woman (trans or otherwise) Based.> woman and woman (trans or otherwise) Neutral. Neither evil nor virtuous. > non-binary or othersValid, so long as they remain sexless (easy mode)> Gay menEvil.
>>42279570Jesus says specifically mocking a "beautiful" person as what they look like being meaningless to how they act or are in their hearts. To define moral acts and what is in your heart, you can read more in the bible how to be yourself, how authenticity is greater than faking who you are...> "For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.” Gospel of Matthew 16:25....unless you are a gay man. Thats evil. That quote though is one of the more heavily analyzed quotes as its often misinterpreted. Actual historians interpret "life" here as meaning "self" and the context meaning being willing to change (aka lose) your external or bodily self for good (God, jesus, virtue, etc) will find your true self. So transitioning, even when ugly, so long as its more true self, is morally virtuous. Hons are closer to God then passoids. You can see my other posts for more citations on the trans being moral as well. Just dont be gay, be monogamous, pick a gender, or be asexual, and you are accepted into heaven (in terms of sexuality effecting entry). Obviously theres more to be done, but relative to Lgbt sex stuff, thats basically it.
>>42279967well, then I guess I'm closer to heaven except I'm a passoid kek.Not religious at all but sometimes I do laugh at these moralistic fags with 2 divorces, three baby mommas and subscription to brothels and OF lecturing me about the immorality of my lifestyle as a married tranny.There is a lot of irony in this world.Good reading, nona. Even though I probably disagree.
>>42279967I think gay people have to be transgressive, they say not to have sex lying down, but to have sex standing up, that's holy. My opinion is that OP should wear a skirt, earrings, be a pretty woman, I don't care anymore about the gospel and following it is a treaty of unhappiness for all LGBT people, because it always ends in speeches about how LGBT people can change to follow the path of holiness, etc.Being Catholic/Evangelical/Protestant is only excellent for picking up women, and gay people in monasteries hooking up with older priests, or in a sudden crisis of faith, which happens quite often. Whether you're a criminal gay, a disruptive gay, or the most infernal gay possible, because, literally, hell is 1000% better without believers, and if you're going to hell to avoid believers, I think that's more than fair.Ultimately, if we were to rely on the Gospel, probably very contradictory figures could be in heaven... and I'm not talking about petty criminals. And that's not like a prodigy returning home, that's impossible. Abramism is one of the most powerful drugs of our time.Let's agree to disagree. :3
>>42279723>Alice from the polycule is the eunuch described in the NT, as she’s having an orgymhm…
>>42280032Thanks!It does take moral standpoint of marriage vs not marriage sex being good vs bad. But again "marriage" is a contextual language term. Jesus describes it as a union of 2 into 1 soul. The most specific, the new testament gets is describing it as a "covenant" which means will or testament, but given barely anyone could read or write back then, its unlikely to mean it must be a formal written marriage contract. The most likely interpretation is marriage is a consensual agreement between a man and a woman to be 1 soul. In modern terms, a long-term monogamous relationship.Divorce actually is accepted in the bible, but it's not considered a good (nor evil) thing, but a necessary thing when adultry has been done. Adultry is clearly defined and actually the only reason Jesus cites for divorce being okay (but not required). Adultry is considered bad in the new testament, by all accounts. But adultery can be forgiven with repentance.
>>42280084> they say not to have sex lying down, but to have sex standing up, that's holy. Source????> pro-tip: these isnt anything like this in the new testament All contradictions you types of people (clearly unread), point out in the bible are comparing new testament to old testament. Which the point of jesus was FREEing us from the old testament judiasm, not all of it, but in specific teachings by jesus to redefine the old teachings. Thats the point of Christianity. Literally read the bible, then judge.
>>42280187Yea no Alice is going to hell.
>>42280411>its unlikely to mean it must be a formal written marriage contractThat for sure is the case.Orthodox (think Armenian, Greek, Romanian, etc.) traditions even have a separate more ancien word to specifically differentiate from the religious understanding of marriage and the legal one.In the Orthodox Tradition after the 17th century it was straight up interpreted as a vow in front of the community and the Lord. In some protestant traditions they still keep that "if anyone has objection speak now or be silent forever" during the marriage ceremony. It has the same root.I've been with my husband for 13 year now. This spring we have the 10yrs anniversary party.>Divorce actually is accepted in the bible, but it's not considered a good (nor evil) thing, but a necessary thing when adultry has been done.I am familiar. But the people I'm talking about didn't divorce for reasons of adultery. But the more petty postmodernist reasons that we're all too familiar with.In my country it's pretty common that seculars have a far more Christian behavior than most of the "Christian" militants.Religion/spirituality isn't for me but I studied history of religions as a civilizational forces and that did a lot of good for no longer being stupid.
>>42280465> militants. Religion/spirituality isn't for me but I studied history of religions as a civilizational forces and that did a lot of good for no longer being stupidYes Im with you on this, im christian agnostic more than any type of atheist, but a historically literate atheist probably follows the teachings without awareness more than proclaimed religious types. Some say church is for sinners.
>>42280517>Some say church is for sinnersHeard that from an Orthodox priest kekI got really friendly with him because it came as an absolute shock to him that the girl he argued religion with was born a boy. Lowkey I took that as absolute evidence of passing.We still chat from time to time (he frequents a charity I volunteer to) but he also got in trouble in church circles because he used me as an example of real-life defying certain popular ideas.After all, religion is what we make of it, ig.
>>42280564> religion is what we make of itPossibly. I subscribe to maybe a little jewish interpretation of heaven, who to them, there is nothing after death, and heaven is something created in this world. Conversely, christians believe its a literal place you go after you die. I think its both, heaven is created here, in this world, and it's also literally where you go after you die. What I mean is you become one with this world after you die. If youve done good, this world is a good (or better) place, after you have become one with it. A little GAIA earth. If you do bad or evil, the world will become that, when your gone you become 1 with the world that is now as evil and bad as you caused it to be. > How to leave it good (or better)?The bible says how. Some people this can be intuitive, but somethings can be complicated or people get confused at times. Thats where religion helps me.
>>42280457Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abomination (Leviticus 18:22). LIES! NOT STANDING UP, everything has to have semantics, if doing it standing up isn't a sin, it didn't specify that all gay sex was.I read the Bible, but I don't agree with it. Not all the moral teachings of the Old Testament were excluded; He himself said that he did not come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17). The ceremonial laws (sacrifices, purity rituals, Jewish festivals) and the judicial laws (that governed the nation of Israel) are no longer obligatory for Christians, as they were fulfilled by Christ or were specific to the cultural and political context of Israel.Jesus came to fulfill the Law, not to abolish the moral law. Its fulfillment resulted in the replacement of the old covenant with the New Covenant (or New Law). But all this is a load of nonsense, and there are clear references to the Old Testament in the New, and many things were extended.
>>42280706> Leviticus 18:22Is that new or old testament? > protip: it is not new testamentEverything else you wrote is literally what I said. EXCEPT... I know you are lying about reading the bible. > how do I know?Because again, youre clueless to things Jesus says in it, which is fundemental to understanding all those "contradictions" in the bible, that are actually Jesus flipping tables on jews.
>>42271470>she didn't read Hebrews
