Give me some LGBT-related conspiracy theories you actually believe in.I'll start:>those viral "males STRUGGLE with this simple challenge!" (like the chair lift, the broomstick challenge, etc.) videos are just a psyop to try to induce/reinforce gender dysphoria in males ("why can i do this even though i'm male? does that mean i'm more like a female?"), the truth is the majority of people can do the challenges easily no matter if they're male or female>ROGD is real and it's a social contagion >the majority of lesbians are just raped women who don't actually like women. they do still find men attractive and want to have sex with them (this is why so many lesbians are fujoshis) they just find it difficult to envision themselves as a woman having sex with a man because they're raped (either mentally by modern femininsm mindpoison (picrel) or phsyically)>being a bottom is just a symptom of narcissism, bottoms are typically very unstable and will gladly ruin someone's life over petty bullshit>the whole "top/bottom" dynamic in general is just an attempt to push heteronormativity into gay relationships, most gay people don't identify with the terms outside of just having a preference in the bedroom. any man who has zero interest in penetrating anyone with his penis is a repper. most gay men are masc4masc and generally switch between topping and bottoming >the "trannies are born with a brain of the opposite sex!" thing was total quackery and will be disproven soon (it already kinda is)
idk man i just wanted to have a vagina
transgenderism is a conspiracy by women to sterilize gays
>>42330704I just wanted to live as a woman.Idgaf about rogd, feminism (if anything I agree with you that feminism is poison), top/bottom or if my brain is this or that. Who the fuck cares?Increased trans visibility has given rise to a fuckton of retarded terminology and discussions. Granted, a lot of trannies themselves are guilty of pushing it too, but that doesn't make it any less retarded.
>>42330704>opposite sex brain troons is disprovenIt's literally not. From an intersex perspective, it actually explains why an incredibly small percentage of the population would be like that. You couldn't rigorously study that nowadays because of the amount of people with paraphilic transsexualism make getting an accurate sample impossible. The social model has ruined everything, as it normally does
>>42330881most intersex people don't have physical dysphoria and live as their birth sex doe
>>42330881It has been disproven. In fact, the entire concept of a male/female brain is a gross oversimplification and most of the differences disappear once you scale a female brain up to the size of a male one.
>>42330904I'm not talking about traditionally intersex people, just that hsts is itself likely a specific dsd
>>42330909Not really. Male and female brains do have differences in sizes of specific brain structures, such as males typically having larger amydalas, or women typically having large hippocampi. It's subtle, but it is a fact that there are differences
>>42330926trans women are men
>>42330926And wouldn't you know it? Tranny brains more resemble their natal birth sex in those few areas than they do the opposite sex.
>>42330939If you developed transsexualism through paraphilic interaction, or otherwise externally, then absolutely. Though to be fair to autogynephiles, those brain structures are generally elastic to modification if you on cross-sex hormones
>>42330704ROGD is real only among AFABs. The afab brain is easily confused and misled. Just a few tiktoks is enough to make them attempt suicide if they don’t get a Stanley cup. Two tiktoks can convince an afab they’ve always been trans*masc.Mtfs are always tru trans.
>>42330955cross sex hormones do not do enough to make men act or look like women trans women always look and act closer to maleif we stopped privileging women above men you wouldn't invest so much in trying to get others to pretend self flagellating self loathing males are female
>>42330926Once again, that's a gross oversimplification. There is more variation inside either sex category than there is between them. Aren't trannies always the ones saying "human sex isn't binary!"? You, yourself brought up le epic intersex (who I'm certain LOVE to be used as nothing more than a weapon by narcissistic trannies to win arguments). Brains, on average, are a mosiac of a variety of different features because we humans are actually unique creatures rather than carbon copies that are easy to fit into one of two broad categories.
i want to kill the trans"man" who posted that onions story, holy fuck, death to him
>>42330979allow me to post my collection
>>42330966Changes in brain structures don't necessarily indicate behavioural change.>pretend self flagellating males are femaleProbably 95% of so-called trans woman derived that from external influence, and so aren't transsexual and shouldn't pursue cross-sex hormone therapy, I would agree with you.
>>42330979
>>42330979anyone got a screengrab of that one thread of the pooner telling people to wipe with a urinal cake?
>>42330971>gross simplificationI agree that it's a simplification, there are a lot of different things at play and so size and function of x or y structure doesn't necessarily indicate one thing or another. All I am saying is that there are subtle and minor but objective differences between sexes in brain structure (on average).>Aren't trannies always the ones saying "human sex isn't binary!"?One's that try to gaslight society to cater to their perversions, absolutely. No actual transsexual thinks like this.
Nah. Hussies are def fem brained. Sorry, they just are. TERFs don't want to admit it ofc, but the rest of women handily do, and tend to adopt these kinds whether they transition or not.
>>42331032FACTS
>>42330704relevant
>>42330704>>the "trannies are born with a brain of the opposite sex!" thing was total quackery and will be disproven soon (it already kinda is)I hate posting too much about this because it's so offensive and insulting to people who disagree, but I agree and I'm going to explain why through a short thought experiment.Imagine a human baby was put on a very comfortable deserted island with perfect climate, that's completely safe, and was cared for by a robot until the age of say 5-6, and from that point on just lived a solitary existence, taking food and water from a big food dispenser it was trained to use by the robot. The baby would have no contact with any humans.In 20 years, that baby grows up. It does not know a language (unless it invented one). It does not know the concepts of male and female.If that baby was a trans, how would its transexuality have manifested? I'd love to hear a good answer cuz I simply can't imagine one and I thought about this an unreasonable amount.
>>42331013just decided to grab it myself
>>42331067>If that baby was a trans, how would its transexuality have manifested? I'd love to hear a good answer cuz I simply can't imagine one and I thought about this an unreasonable amount.Well we can agree it'd probably still have some form of sexuality right? It's pretty easy to imagine some form of agp behavior (crossdressing, coconut bikinis, etc.) in that situation. It's also easy to imagine huss behaviors fantasizing about a guy plowing them in their pussy and ramming sticks in there, etc.
>>42330704I believe crossdressing became medicalized (aka troons) as a way to make homosexuality extinct. Instead of castrating gays as punishment they tricked us into paying for it ourselves.
>>42331103how would someone develop the idea of crossdressing if they didnt have the idea of clothing? remember they are totally isolated aside from the robot
>>42331067how would such a person's loneliness manifest? i can't really imagine it when they have no concept of "other" but that doesn't mean loneliness isn't real or doesn't arise from naturally occurring brain structures
THE BWC IS UNSTOPPABLE ALL BUTCH LESBOS LOVE SUCKING MY VEINY WHITE DICKsnizz lickin by itself can NEVER satisfy them enough.They all fall to their knees when the COCK arrives
>>42331103The logical conclusion of the thought experiment is that the person is completely isolated from humanity, and possibly couldn't even conceptualise that there are others like him/her. That's the problem with this thought experiment, because literally everything requires something being taught by another person, even if it is biological in nature (like sexuality).
>>42331103>Well we can agree it'd probably still have some form of sexuality right?I don't know if we can agree, but I'll grant you that one and let's assume so.>It's pretty easy to imagine some form of agp behavior (crossdressing, coconut bikinis, etc.) in that situationIt's not easy to imagine at all. The concept of crossdressing doesn't exist outside of our distinction of male and female clothes and male and female gender.>It's also easy to imagine huss behaviors fantasizing about a guy plowing them in their pussy and ramming sticks in thereWanting anal or whatever doesn't mean you're transexual.>>42331136I don't know honestly. I feel like a being raised without the presence of others, and without ever being introduced to them, would not necessarily be able to articulate the idea of wanting others. But it's not unimaginable that it could have a conscious or subconscious yearning for something they can't articulate.
>>42331141>because literally everything requires something being taught by another person, even if it is biological in nature (like sexuality).Wouldn't the implication then be that transexuality is caused by others and not something you're born with (something in your brain, as we crudely say)? I guess a good faith argument for transexuality being innate would be that it needs to be "unlocked" by others. I don't know if I buy it but I'm trying to be open-minded and not a chud.
>>42330704>>the "trannies are born with a brain of the opposite sex!" thing was total quackery and will be disproven soon (it already kinda is)This isn't a conspiracy theory. Transgenderism has no biological basis and is instead a culture bound syndrome that seeks to pathologize natural variation.
>>42330704this doesn't make sense OPif any man who has no interest in penetrating people is trans, how can trans people not exist?
>>42331120trannies don't believe in peer pressure, they think the idea that someone could pressure gays to castrate themselves is impossible
>>42331209That's how the thought experiment is framed, but the logical conclusion of the thought experiment is the problem. If you don't know what male and female, or the concept of sexual dimorphism, or human expressions of sexual dimorphism through gender, of course you're not necessarily going to be able to verbalise it. At the same time, you aren't going to be able to know/understand other concepts, like communication, sexuality etc. We take a lot of knowledge for granted on the basis of it being imparted to us, and that's why it doesn't make it sense.I would agree with your suggestion (though I'd disagree with the framing) that you 'unlock' it. I'd say that having a reference point allows you to understand and verbalise your individual needs better.
>>42331186>But it's not unimaginable that it could have a conscious or subconscious yearning for something they can't articulate.yeah, that's how dysphoria would manifest, how it did manifest for me as a kid
>>42331258Whoever told you that is a groomer.
>>42331186>>42331141Idk I think Tarzan would like Jane still because Tarzan was genetically/biologically a straight man
>>42331498If Tarzan had never seen another human before, I'd doubt it
>>42330704Dont see the problem with picrel
>>42330704>>the "trannies are born with a brain of the opposite sex!" thing was total quackery and will be disproven soon (it already kinda is)two more weeksalso guessing the letter off the behavior, schizofrenic mtf repressor with hatred of females developed as a cope
>>42331555T makes straight males horny for foids idk what to tell you
>>42331620If you don't know what a female is, or can even ascertain that you're the only one of your kind, how are you going to know what you're attracted to, or even what attraction is?
>>42331013>illusions of grandeursis went on a screech after getting rejected who is talking
>>42331620it makes them horny, if they don't know what a woman is it's not going to magically manifest the desire for one, tarzan would just be a gooner or be balls deep in gorilla girls all day. by the way did you know humans have absolute horse cocks compared to other apes?
>>42331255>I'd say that having a reference point allows you to understand and verbalise your individual needs betterThe objection I have with that is that I can't really say whether they're "needs", or if it's simply the power of suggestion working its magic, and then we misinterpret it as innate needs being sated. This can't really be tested so I'm gonna concede that I simply don't know, and maybe it's unknowable to begin with.
>>42331620T exposure (e.g. CAH women) makes feeemales horny for foids too
>>42331635Idk, I have a pet dog. I didn't raise him around other dogs and he was even castrated young.Now when exposed to female dogs he tries to fuck them and he also tries to fuck male dogs in usual dominance display stuff (i.e. there is a difference how he goes for the female and male dogs).This stuff is innate to a large extgent. I think it's somewhat environmental but some hard coded rather than purely environmental as you frame it
>>42331874Has powers ever come up with a convincing theory for gaydens and why it doesn't happen with them?Like >>42331051 shows he can spot who won't be affected but I wonder what's going on there
>>42331903>when exposed to female dogsThat's my point. I can't speak from a dogs perspective, but purely rationally, if you've never perceived someone of the opposite sex, how can you determine attraction?
>>42331989Well yea in the Tarzan Jane example Tarzan is attracted to Jane when he sees her but isn't attracted to Jane's dad
>>42332006Well in that case yeah fair enough
>>42331051This is my ex lol. I'm curious if he can also accurately guess which MtFs will become more androphilic on HRT.
>>42330752why would gays need to be sterilized? mpreg isnt actually real.
>>42332174Might be the same pattern.Small ones become more androphilic while big ones "chadlite" go transbian.
>>42332174someone should teach that dr about the digit ratio
>>42332707but I'm a bigger one and became more androphilickinda it's weird I'm have a very vicious bi cycle but prog in particular made me drool over guysI also know trannies of the same phenotype with very different orientations
>>42332731I'm moreso talking about trannies who BECOME androphilic rather than those who were already androphilic. Also applies to cissoids whose orientation shifts over time I guess.
>>42332174That's easy. Picrel.Basically if they have a gf and claim to be gynephilic but are chadly pre-trans they will switch attraction to men. If they are incel/feminine/small/no gf pre-transition they will remain gynephilic.There are also some androphilic gayboy hsts types with the same physiognomy who will become purely gynephilic after transitioning but they're less known.A few ways to view it.>1. The universe wants you to suffer. Going on hrt cannot be an escape for the person who wishes they were androphilic(because they can't get a gf), that would be too easy. Ditto, the person who has a happy life with their gf will also have their lives ruined and become androphilic because of course.>2. If you're a chad and also are subby you will likely give into pressure to date women who hit on your in certain environments. Even if you are only attracted to men. You will go along to get along.
>>42332752>con't>3. Think of it like people who have intersex like disorders and those that do not. Powers says the Helgas are high natural T, therefore their personality is not affected by going on hrt as they were already sort of on it. In contrast the pixies(normal phenotypic women) experience a huge shift. Ditto for amabs, those that are already low T/high E/etc will experience only a very little shift if at all whereas those who are high T normies who suddenly get their T nuked will have a huge shift. Hondosing or poondosing could also be involved here in a way.Back to the example of the hsts tranny who becomes gynephilic after hrt, I think we can explain it with opposite logic of the subby chad. In that case we have a very feminine amab who does not masculinize, they are assumed to be gay and taught that they are due to some circumstances. When they transition they no longer experience pressure in the same way and don't need a bf to feel feminine. An alternative hormonal explanation would be their T is reduced from low to zero and they go from androphilic to lesbian-ace, i.e. a weak sex drive either way.
>>42332736I believe you. I was bi and still am bi. But if my bf were to break up with me, I'd still probably pursue men. But I'm also small.I only know 3 trannies IRL. The bigger one is the only one who still actively pursues women.I suppose there is a sampling issue too in these studies. And now even clinicians' experience may not help that much anymore with the advent of DiY.
>>42332752>If they are incel/feminine/small/no gf pre-transition they will remain gynephilic>mfw incel and became solidly androphilic
>>42332816Imo fakecel tho sure describe your story more. Also be sure to include how you knew you were actually into women and how you now know you're actually into men.Also to be more specific this probably only applies to cutecels(small/neotenous/feminine) rather than those who were incel for other reasons(I.e. being not attracted to women so not bothering)
>>42332848>Also be sure to include how you knew you were actually into women and how you now know you're actually into menGranted I was bi. Men were nicer to me but didn't want me romantically. Women wouldn't give me the time of the day, except the autistic ones. But those didn't want me romantically either.I'm still not weirded out by women (so in a way I'm still bi) but I'm too in love with my bf to think about it more profoundly.>fakecelmeh, we need a term for chud troons. Anyone who is not a troon the "correct" way is fake.
