>>42335823
there really does need to be a superstraight equivalent for bisexuality.
and desu even though the term superstraight was mostly a meme made to just denigrate trannies and such, historically being straight has almost always meant 'gynephilic', not only being attracted to natal women, and so the term actually makes sense. similarly bisexuality should mean 'being androphilic and gynephilic', not 'attracted to both sexes'. since there's such a wide expression of traits within a sex the latter is nearly meaningless.

>>42335823
Calling it true bisexuality has always seemed weird, like saying all the other bi's are fake.

>>42337370
>the term superstraight was mostly a meme made to just denigrate trannies and such,
LOL. Complete delusional bullshit. Check the charts of "no trans ever" by gender and sexual orientation. Superstraight and supergay are the overwhelming majority. The highest trans acceptance rates is with bis, and bis that accept any trans at all is still a minority.

If anything, you should designate the people who would accept trans at all separately, like as chasers. This would save trannies so much heartache as well.

>>42337444
idc about self-reports and the modern social game men play of jostling for status by calling everything under the sun gay.
i'm talking about the historic precedent of men fucking other men in war, in prison, etc., and fucking effeminate or young males.
since i spoke about history why on earth would you start talking about trans people? although, funnily enough, in societies where men took on female roles (which isn't exactly analogous to trannies) men did fuck them! lol
gay men are also, generally, speaking not as gay as they claim.

>>42337537
oh, because i brought up superstraight. it's early.
i didn't actually care about whether trannies are a desirable category to straight people (though on reflection outside of taboo i'm sure passing or near passing trannies certainly would be). i was mostly talking about this whole "i'm bi because i'm into femboys" thing.
trannies are a pretty new phenomena, and so it's hard to talk about; we're in its context. but i still can't help but recall berdaches, and i don't even think they were ever castrated.

>>42337564
>i was mostly talking about this whole "i'm bi because i'm into femboys" thing.
I don't see your line of thinking here, but I don't think it matters. There's a reason why bi and pan are both separate.

>>42337720
they're saying there should be a delineation between people who are attracted to both femininity and masculinity vs people who are attracted only to one but don't care very much about natal sex. eg guys who only have sex with cis women but are occasionally attracted to passoids and identify as bisexual as a result