>>42339810
Ivg comes out in the next 10 years. Then same sex couples can have babies in theory. I'm pretty sure trans genes are real so they could get passed on.

What I am worried more about is if two males have babies together, will the kids be hormonally and bodily "wrong"
Imagine if the mother male has a normal male body and his skincells are turned into an egg. This egg is not from the female version of this male cause she does not exist but it would be like if he was a big and burly woman with a male levels of testosterone, and this is now the mother. I would imagine a daughter of these two males to be a disgusting creature. She could be a cis woman who suffers from gender dysphoria cause her mother is a man and it made her have a moid like body.
Same if two woman have babies. The babies "father" could be 153cm, with female levels of estrogen.. son would be a femboy basically.
With trans people at least the hormone levels would be more like their opposite sex and it might be better for the epigenetics.
I don't know is having bio kids worth it

>>42339810
wonder what else that is more interesting is possible given magical fiction has suddenly become reality

>>42339810
>In 2013, a twin study combined a survey of pairs of twins where one or both had undergone, or had plans and medical approval to undergo, gender transition, with a literature review of published reports of transgender twins. The study found that one third of identical twin pairs in the sample were both transgender: 13 of 39 (33%) monozygotic or identical pairs of assigned males and 8 of 35 (22.8%) pairs of assigned females. Among dizygotic or genetically non-identical twin pairs, there was only 1 of 38 (2.6%) pairs where both twins were trans.

>>42339947
i mean it's just a matter of picking one of each chromosome (except if both are XY you have to pick the X from somebody since YY does not work). it's hard to say there's not more going on we don't know about but it seems simple. you realize that things like genes for breast size are still encoded in men and like male baldness etc is still encoded in women right?
(also the same technique for turning skin cells into eggs would be used on normally-XX-cis-women too with the same hazards. and probably AIS XY cis women before us because of course cis women are way more important in society. I wouldn't be surprised if AIS women are declared fine while there is a movement to ban its use on trans women. let's not even get into de-la-Chapelle syndrome... I guess in the intersex cases if you pick the bad chromosome the children are also doomed lol. At least with whatever causes transness they only seem to be statistically doomed)

>>42339810

I would assume the outcomes for gender incongruent individuals who are allowed to fulfill their preferred role from early childhood onwards don't have particularly poor outcomes therefore I wouldn't have a moral issue with giving birth to said trans children.

>>42339947
Cope, not that simple to simulate a placenta