We're fucked:(
Why did the Guardian post this article under “employment law” isn’t the bigger issue here transgender rights?
>>42358989every time
>>42359005What? A brunette?
>>42359016
>>423589891) because technically it is an employment law dispute2) so many of you seriously took the b8 that the left are your friends. they're not and never have been.
>first world problemsI don't know why people there are so stubborn, this could have easily been solved by providing a private space for that transwoman, but I'm pretty sure neither budged, one refusing to listen to the majority, well knowing it is a rigged game, and the others taking advantage of their status.
>>42359038because realism comes in very short supply with far too many tranners.
>>42359050That's still illogical, they don't want her there, then it is their duty to provide her with an alternative, but no, it's better to ask daddy government to solve it and create a historical precedent and plastering their faces all over it.
>>42359058I guessed, I don't even need to lookup the whole story to know she tried to play the victim card, it may work in some cases but against a group of cis women? She should have known better, no one is going to sympathize with her in that case.
>>42358898>>42358989Are you new? The BBC and Guardian are transphobic
>>42359070>but no, it's better to ask daddy governmentthat's how brits function. On anything.
>>42358989the "biggest issue" is never transgender rights
>>42359038they don't want a "private space", they want a space to show their privateseasy mistake to make
>>42359204They just want to not be treated as a second class citizen for being a tranny
>>42359177I am aware most people are unfair against transwomen, I know they will do anything they can to make transwomen feel they are not welcome anywhere, but this shouldn't have reached that far, it was an easily solvable issue.>>42359184I guess >>42359204What is wrong with you?
