WTF are gay people real? And I'm not gay?? For years I've been operating on the belief that sexuality is not deterministic due to my own experience, to wit: I'm a straight guy who has no problem with non-straight fantasies, (they're really hot) and theoretically no problem with having a gay experience. I'm not attracted to men, but part of me always wondered if that was my personality or conditioning, like I could be gay if I wanted. Nonetheless, it made no sense to be considered gay because historically speaking, I would be called straight as a primarily straight man with some gay temptations. The only logical conclusion I could draw was that sexuality involves socialization, and the terms are deeply flawed. (e.g. bisexuals are "part gay" which doesn't fit the definition of gay)Lately though, I've come to the realization that my sexuality is actually derived from masturbation, which started much earlier than any other type of experience. That explains why I'm repulsed by men but see no contradiction in fantasies, it also explains why I'm not falling over myself to sleep with zillions of women. Am I destined to be a masturbator for all times, and where the fuck do I fit in the sexuality spectrum? Are true gays really that way from the womb?
>>42363133>I'm a straight guy who has no problem with non-straight fantasies, (they're really hot)this isn't a normal straight experience, you are a fag to some extent
aw sweetanother K2 bisexualtranswomen, great news... you're either getting another transbian or chaser... <3
>>42363157Interested to hear your take once you've read to the end. There's no "some extent" of being gay, you are or you aren't. If there's a need to introduce concepts like 10% gay it's time for a whole new lexicon.
>>42363174...the fuckin Kinsey scale?The thing that exists?
>>42363172Both gays and trannies are horrifying in their self-destructive defiance of nature and their follower mentality.
>>42363184>debonked 1970s social science that was made up to begin with
>>42363174yeah no, i mean you're bi, the terminology exists gay people exist, they are born that way, hormonal makeup in the womb makes them so
>>42363210It's just a shorthand for, "How much homo activity do you partake in"I get that it triggers trannies because nobody would conscionably call a tranny-only-fucker a straight man
>>42363356That's what I started the thread to find out, but nothing I've seen so far in life amounts to actual proof. Certainly not your post. As for being bi, are bi people just the majority, and superior? Why are other people not free to do what they want?>>42363369None by any historical definition, maybe I was predetermined in the womb to consoom huge amounts of porn.
>>42363556Bi males cannot break the mental image of how straight they "need" to be.There are far more bisexual males than reported. But it's BAD. Trannies hate knowing you're not 150% female-only and they're not a magical exception. Women hate knowing you could easily find a penis and not be under their thumb for access to an exclusive female body.Women? Not as much. They practically expect people to clap when they "come out" as a factory-standard female--but choose male partners due to the ability to mind control them and not deal with other women (see: they know they're intolerable).Biphobia is encouraged by all manner of society.
>>42363606>reportedyou mean, there are far more than the existing definition can support. Nothing about me fits the definition of bi except that I'm capable of doing things straight people supposedly cannot do.
>>42363645I mean, yeahBisexuality is a one-drop ruleIf you can tolerate scenarios outside of heterosexual disgust or homosexual disgust, then you're neither.It's really a catch-all for many types of fetishes and sexualities, including, I think, AGP (which people insist is a "straight" fetish but seems highly counterintuitive to be that). It's why bisexuals aren't going to ambivalently want transwomen, men, women, or transmen; it's not about wanting every form of human, that's more of a pansexual sub-bi sexuality.
>>42363133youre not straight, youre pansexual. literally the vast majority of people are pan.
>>42363713lolnothey aren'tdo you have a single fact to substantiate why literally everybody will fuck anything but a small percent won't, when the reverse appears true?
>>42363729LOL you actually think pan people just randomly fuck everything? fuck this board has gotten stupid. everyone is selective, but when faced with a actual billion possible partners, odds are you will find one of the same gender that you will fuck. pan doesnt mean you have no standards or preferences, just that your eligible partners includes a much wider group, even if you would reject 99.9% of the group.
