Why aren't AFABs into chastity as much as AMABs are?
>>42366169Amabs are more attractive
male chastity is hot and female chastity looks goofy as hell
Chastity devices block a potential for action, like damming a river. Women have no potential of action at all.
chastity for men is feminizing and indicates sexual submissiveness and receptive homosexualitywomen are like that normally, so it's less interestingalso men are less able to control their libido, which makes chastity more interesting. But that's probably also a subset of feminizing
>>42366185>>42366196trvke, locking a penis into staying flaccid and small so that the sub has to flick themselves like they have a clit is a hell of a lot hotter than metal underwear
>>42366169amabs are innocent and pure, afabs are immoral harlots
>>42366169part of the appeal of male chastity comes from weaponising the normie psychosexual assumption that men are super horny and need to wank/cum against themanother part of it is that 'scoring' and access to sex increases a male's power in the normie psychosexual worldview, whereas it degrades a woman (she becomes a 'slut'). so a woman in chastity is not being humiliated in the same wayalso, in the normie psychosexual worldview, female people are seen as inherently less sexual and have less sexual need if any at all
>>42366169Speaking of chastity: are there any devices for guys that allow somewhat of an erection, but really emphasize the blocking aspect?
>>42367060just say healthy people think like this and everyone gets it, no need to open up your jewish dictionary
