>you can JUST be a womanmy 6'2 height and size 45 (EU) feet humbly disagree
>>42379208Skill issue
>>42379211post height and shoe size
>>423792415'5 and size 8 US.
>>42379247see? I'm like not even a human next to you, like an ogre type of person, we are simply different
>>42379208This build is fine if you are mostly legs, if you are torso...well I'm sure you'll make it anyway
>>42379208>Have model height>Thinks she can't be a womanOkay retard
>>42379567model height is 5'9 for womenik nobody wants to hurt other people but I really will NEVER pass
>>42379567I fucking hate the model argument. of course a model at 6'2 is unmistakably female, she's literally so pretty and perfect that she became a model, it's like the peak of attractiveness. this essentially means that to pass as model you have to be flawless in all other aspects in addition to being tall. unfortunately with height the size of most other body parts scale meaning shoulders, hands, feet, arms, etc. which ruins your chances of passing. so saying wAaA jUsT bE a MoDeL is stupid and dismissive of the actual problem.>t 6'2 'moder
>>42379208It's the dead of winter here, and you can walk up and down the street all day without seeing a single skirt that isn't basically a long parka. The other day I finally spotted one, miniskirt + black pantyhose, so of course it stood out to me, but I immediately knew something was off. The thing that tipped me off before I even thought about it consciously was that xhe was my size. I'm also 6'2 and size 45. Even just out of the corner of your eye you can instantly clock a dude from the frame.
>>423797066'2 is fine as I said earlier you just have to rely heavily on a slender/lean build if you are mostly legs this makes it easier. If you are mostly torso and you put on too much weight you'll end up looking how you currently perceive yourself
>>42379751>>42379741
>>42379706>>42379751Friendly reminder that in ANSUR II (2012), of the ~2000 female subjects included in the study, there was not a single one taller than 182 cm.
>>4237925750% of trans people are ogres and ontologically can't be considered human by basic standards. They should return to the swamp where they belong. Shrek was a satire. An ogre (tranny) would never date a princess (white woman)
why are all the short trans women telling the really tall trans women why being extremely tall for a cis woman is actually good?
wow thats a tall womanim taller than u btw
>>42379208these were my measurements at 14 when i started hrt and im still supposed to be considered a luckshit lmao i fucking wish
>>42380415What else can we tell? We're trying to be nice
>>42379706Transwomen are not seeing "passing" as "geometric mimcry of female skeleton".Their blunted and twisted self-perception and sex radar both look for "pretty".The problem is that they find transwomen pretty. Meaning, through GAMP and AGAMP, they see twink features as girl features.But I think already you see the hole in this fuzzy sense of similarity. I'm curious if the conflation is more common via bisexual/"transbian" versus bisexual/homosexual or the AGP/HSTS archetypes.
