It's wild how troons claim they want a dutiful, protective and paternal man but deperson and cut him off when he even partially ascribes to political views that are rooted in duty, asymmetrical obligations and heirarchy. I'm finished with being hurt.
MAYBE they dont want a rightoid as a bf you fucking muppet
>>42392879She literally told me I treated her better than any libshit boy did
>>42392753>>42392930>being a protective partner means i HAVE to chud and if you really loved me you'd validate me for thislol you deserved it. get your head out of your ass and maybe there will be delicious flaccid cock in your future again
>>42392753>loving a woman means I HAVE to be racist
>>42392753was it the spousal rape view, the hates black people view, or the loving israel view
>>42392958>>42393016>>42393065You're just salting my wounds. None of you know me.
>>42393116You didnt say what political view caused it, so you left it open for us to guess
>>42393116yeehaw you fuckin like that dontcha boy
>>42392753>>42393116>it's wild how troons [...]you don't know me either, dumbshit. you came here to bitch about your romantic misfortune and led off by chalking it up to uncharitable generalization about your ex and your audience. what the fuck did you think was going to happen?i'm coming to the only conclusion i can based on the information you gave me and the way you conveyed it: you deserved it.
>>42392930man you must have some hideous politics
>>42392753It's always so hilariously obvious when someone is leaving out details because they know they're in the wrong. It's like when a lady cop accidentally shoots someone and shouts "shots have been fired!" into her radio.>duty, asymmetrical obligations and heirarchyLike, come on. These words only look innocent if you're fucking stupid.
>>42392753Maybe your political views are abhorrent?
>>42392930And yet she dumped you for a lib. You clearly did something wrong in her eyes, probably had some heinous political views
>>42392753Normal women have this same problem and its hilarious. They're always going on about how they're not attracted to liberal nice guys (cuz they are weak beta simps) but then don't want to date a conservative. They want to be protected and provided for on the basis that they are females, which is a traditional gender role, but then are rad fems. It's ok because they will all end up alone and sexually frustrated as well.>>42394556>duty, asymmetrical obligations and heirarchyThese are neutral things that can be good or bad, but you assumed they are bad. You are silly.
>>42394832>they're not attracted to liberal nice guys (cuz they are weak beta simps)No dude this is just what low value, boring, lazy men tell each other to feel validated for being chronically undateable. It couldn't possibly be because you refuse to do romantic gestures, upkeep your hygiene and grooming, or actually talk to women. It's just that women don't like "nice guys", the fucking whores.Some men are just so fucking cucked by internet exposure and manosphere adjacent media that you actually made yourself unfuckable. But blame women for it, I'm sure that'll land you a smokeshow gf.
>>42394832Hierarchy is always bad for those caught up in the lower castes. It's only good for those on top. Asymmetrical obligations just mean "inequality". Who's getting the harder obligations? Duty can be present in any ideology but conservatism feels entitled to it.
>>42394832>but you assumed they are bad. You are silly.Either this is bad faith or you're genuinely retarded.
