trans women are women, right?Because everyone is acting like that's what we're supposed to be doing here, but it goes too far.
>>42398407I believe it.>it goes too farget over it spongebob
>>42398407trans is an adjective. not a noun.
>>42398407Some are. Some aren't. Case by case.
>wahh wahh flesh type A can't ever be flesh type B!!!!!who fucking caresI crave the strength and certainty of steel
>>42398407UhhhMAH BOYfriend
>>42398407Well yeah they're women. You think men would look and act like that?
>>42398452You mean like, tall woman, fat woman, trans woman?Eh... again, I'd have to put that in the "goes too far" category. I see what you're doing, but it lands flat. Like, that's a word game. Like a seahorse is a horse or something.
>>42398653I think trans women would look and act like that. Not men, not women, but trans women. Does that make sense?
>>42398407No one thinks thatbut we tell them we do so we can fuck them
>>42398452And it gets welded to "woman" to make a new noun:transwoman
>>42398677Nah they're still women
>>42400170They are trans women.We treat all this like we have two boxes, man and woman, and when someone "transitions" we move them from one box to the other box, but that's not what happens at all!In reality, you get moved into a NEW box, the trans box. I think we should recognize this fact, fighting against it is futile and causes unnecessary friction in society.
>>42398407well... I mean they are women. just not females. male women. atleast the ones who pass. masculine women cis or trans will unfortunately be looked at with suspicion. idk where the studs are supposed to go. I just wish we had mixed use bathrooms. and a separate one for families.
>>42398662>I see what you're doing, but it lands flat. Like, that's a word game. Like a seahorse is a horse or something.dense? a sea horse is a horse, a seahorse isn't :v
>>42400789I can kind of get that, but lumping them in with FEMALE women is... not accurate. Kind of a defining feature of "woman" is not being male, after all. Actually it's the only fixed point in the concept when you think about it... it all hinges on sex. Idk, I think let people play with their phenotypes but treat it for what it is; fashion.
>>42400943>it all hinges on sex. Idk, I think let people play with their phenotypes but treat it for what it is; fashion.nta hmm yes the fashion in phenotypes not the biological reality or so, trans women are female aligned and male neutralised, having them not lumped with women is nonsensical. but what am i talking about you're probably just baiting
>>42401426Yeah, fashion. Gender as performance and all that. There isn't a biological reality to transgenderism, you know that right?
>>42398407spongebob wouldnt say that
all trans women are male
if it quacks like a duck
