I'm sorry, but truly bisexual men don't exist.
>>42568507What if I'm basically an autogynephile, with mild masochist qualities, but I identify as an occult mystic traditionalist?
>>42568507They are more real than heterosexual women>>42568210
>>42568507>no homoflexible man typefake and gay
>>42568507Are all fauxbi men originally heterosexual, or can there be those that are actually gay too? i would expect oghomo fauxbi men to be even common considering there is far more pressure socially to be straight. >>42568561Maybe women experience sexuality through a different medium than men do. Men measure sexuality through genital responses, but maybe women are somehow way less physical than that,
>>42568507stop posting this thread retard no one cares about what you have to say
>>42568614Sage everyone knows you're a sissy, stop being ashamed of yourself and transition.
>>42568601there are gay men who call themselves bi because in theory they would fuck a woman, but in reality basically only fuck men unless a woman serves herself to him on a silver platter. these men are typically more homoflexible types and tend to be found among the hypermasc gay sorts. think that one bear who fucked a woman once, appreciates a decent pair of tits, and calls himself bi on account of that.
Why does the existence of bisexual men cause so much seethe? It’s especially funny that people belonging to identities that are poorly attested before recent decades feel the need to dismiss the only queer identity (bi male) that has consistently been shown to exist for all of human history.
I only like masculine women and feminine men
>>42568601>Men measure sexuality through genital responseswomen have genital response, to other women
>>42568683based. same here.
>>42568683Masculine and feminine to which extent?
>>42568507idk why people are always trying to create theories about bi guysi like fucking bossy women and i like fucking pathetic men. its straightforward.
>>42568683I top all kinds of women (cis and trans) and feminine men.I also bottom for all of them.With masculine men I'm a bottom. My dick seems to go limp if I try fucking one, lol.Am I truly bi?
>>42568731sounds a lot like me and I consider myself pretty baseline bi. I'll top fem guys and women but if I'm a room with a "man", there's only one way it's going down, and that's him inside me
>>42568507I'm a pederast
>>42568646I see two major points that makes people upset at bisexuals. The first is queers that feel that it's "unfair" that bisexuals can straight pass and have the option to have a "acceptable" relationship in our society. You see this often when they mock bisexuals when they end up in a long term hetero relationship. The other comes from internal misogyny and misandry that most people have where if a romantic interest would pass them up for someone who is a different gender than themselves , it's embarrassing. Being dumped for someone of the opposite sex is seen as the ultimate humiliation so the mere potential of that happening makes them mad at bisexuals
>>42568776Do you bottom for him or just suck him off?
>>42568813yeah that second thing has resulted in several mindbroken afabs in my life. its rough.
>>42568847>Do you bottom for himobviously
>gay dudes when a bi doesn't want to fuck them
>>42568702NTA but i want a woman that has sharp features. Think Courtney hope, that one eyed bitch in the fallout show, kristen stewart, angelina jolie ,etcI want a woman that's strong and has self respect. She is either my peer or a useless worthless bug.I don't like it when a woman acts overly feminine and submissive and slutty.It's the opposite with men (whom I'm interested in sexually, not regular men). they have to be completely overly feminine and bratty faggots. I want to take full control over them. I want to pound them.It's like the madonna whore complex but with women and faggots
>>42568787the Trump administration has an opening for you
>>42568787twinium
I like being male and I'm very masculine, both when it comes to interests and my body I like almost all kinds of women, hyperfeminine trannies (think brazilian pornstars) and, I'm ashamed to admit, very masculine men.
>>42569055Really?
