[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1772029440569.jpg (57 KB, 640x480)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
I'm a passing 18 year old tranny. Chasers who can't afford Millies are not worth my time.
>>
passing is a myth
>>
File: 4d0-340571104.jpg (87 KB, 800x600)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
I'm too poor for a RM but I actually bought a $2500 watch once for a date with a trans girl when I found out she worked in jewelry. It arrived later than expected and she ghosted me when I took too long to suggest a time and place. Still have the watch though.

Anyway, watch thread? No sperging about cofe time or poortadello, this is not /fa/.
>>
>>42776086
Which watch did you get?
>>
>>42776086
If you could go back, would you have taken her out without the watch?
>>
>>42776004
I make 7 figures and am 6"3, girls or femboys ignore me and I get no dates or anything.
face > hair > voice/charisma > height > body > penis > money

Unless you're chad men arent allowed to have sex
>>
>>42776387
I would prefer not to say the ref # because if you take the venn diagram of chasers and people who wear that exact watch it easily narrows it down to me and no one else. But it was meticulously chosen to be decent enough to not be an absolute cringe shitter, without being expensive enough to make me look like I suck at money given my address and line of work, because let's face it unless you're >7 digits net worth you should not be wearing anything like a rolex or you look like a moron, an aspirational moron.

>>42776434
I don't know, probably not, she looked pretty classy and I'm just a regular guy. I am not even sure I would have if it had arrived on time, but thinking about taking her out on a date wearing my $290 ebay watch was giving me too much anxiety to continue the conversation.
>>
>>42776440
what?? Gimme ur discord
>>
>Wasting all that money on an outdated, redundant device just because it's a status symbol
Subhuman mentality desu. People who care about that shit usually have a double digit iq.
>>
>>42776440
If you make 7 figures annually, you might be doing something immoral. Which means they're just smelling the Satan on you.

>>42776453
That explanation makes sense.
>>
>>42776524
Everything you do, everything you wear is about communicating status. Virtue signaling about how you're above it all is part of that system. So if you're doing that with some awareness, ok, but otherwise, yikes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja2fgquYTCg
>>
>>42776578
Didn't ask. Don't care. Spending millions on a watch is nigger mentality no matter which way you look at it.
>>
>>42776778
I'm sorry things are so bad for you that $2500 = millions of dollars. I mean for me I look at people who paid $2500 extra for the moon roof and I think they're idiots, but we all have our vices.

Perhaps some day it may turn around. It probably won't because k-shaped economy and all that, but we mustn't lose hope.
>>
RMs are like embarrassingly ugly, at least give the man some taste, a VC222, pre-daytona, GS, an oak, A.lange, JLC duoface, pp, anything else really.
>>
watches are sad
>>
>>42776453
>pretty classy and I'm just a regular guy
Preempting women's assessment of you is the fastest way to ruin your own chances desu, obv you can't make them normal people just by being authentic or w/e, but nobody wants to fw someone who's always looking for the chance to say they're not good enough.
Give it a try next time anon, the worst that can happen is trading yt dinner time for an awkward night out
maybe buying expensive watch just to impress strangers isn't the best move tho
>>
Bump
>>
>>42776004
all the based people wear casio fw 91
i'd seriously not interact with someone with an overly expensive watch, it is just mental retardation.
>>
>>42779202

I don't think it necessarily is if they are a nerd out about their watches its just a more upscale autistic fixation
>>
File: hq720.jpg (53 KB, 686x386)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>42778539
I had wanted the watch for a while but I just couldn't rationalize it because the meme is you buy a watch to impress other men, "women don't care about that stuff" but then having to face the fact that there were attractive women I could date who worked in a field where they would no doubt know more than me about watches changed my attitude
>>
>>42776559
>If you make 7 figures annually, you might be doing something immoral. Which means they're just smelling the Satan on you.
No one ever got rich by saving puppies.
>>
>>42776004
casios are the reddit option for zoomers, at this point it's people trying too hard
rolex is dece but you need to pick a good one not a shitter, too many shitters
poorfags are funny they resent people for buying fancy watches but cricket noises when money is blown on gachaslop uber eats spotify netflix upsold cars etc, in general the spiritual peasantry of this generation reacts to beauty and craftsmanship like a rabid animal near water
>>42776086
this story is brutal but I can't even blame you
>>
>>42781470
>this generation reacts to beauty and craftsmanship like a rabid animal near water
Oh fuck off. No one buys expensive watches because of the craftsmanship. It's purely a flex to show off how much money they have. It's materialistic consumerist retards trying to one up other materialistic consumerist retards.
>>
>>42776004
You probably look like shit and are a horrible fuck
>>
>>42781647
>Seething hon



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.