>Your delusional for thinking your women >BTW god flood whole earth and put everyone in a boat Why tf do religious people get a pass but we are marginalized? They can tell their 8 yr old kids how they'll go to hell if they don't do as they're told.
>>42893317It's you're*And religions have been around for centuries and are a huge part of cultures, so we're supposed to respect that I guess, even though atheism makes the most sense
the paradox of tolerance means tolerating the intolerant
Better publicity and bigger stick to enforce the carrot.Anyone with half a brain sees the incongruity. It just isn't high on our list of priorities for random citizen.
>>42893317It's because it's new to normies. The bible cucks have been around for thousands of years. Its boring. Way overdone. But the average person hasn't even heard of a tranny until recently. Post 2010, but more like 2015 and beyond. People are still shocked by it.
>>42893317>picrelbut... tectonic plates...
>>42893317i don't know if you're looked around much but people are kind of retarded
>>42893337Libertarianism solved for that already. It is called private property and self defense.
>>42893317>Why tf do religious people get a pass but we are marginalized? They can tell their 8 yr old kids how they'll go to hell if they don't do as they're told.comparing religion (peace) to chemical drugs, being a social outcast, high suicidal + other issues. Yes we also tell them santa claus exists, but you know what? They will figure out that hes not real...
>>42893623>Religion>PeaceEither retarded or a troll. You choose
>>42893317I mean there most certainly was giant floods that wiped out entire regions of early humans, based on modern science. Which to those people, would have felt like their entire world, and would have been extremely important stories to pass down. All old testament by the way. As a christian transwoman, i dont really understand how that makes those stories less or even unimportant? They are at minimum, part of very rarely preserved tradition/cultures going back atleast 3,000+ years ago. Stories can be both true/real and require some metaphorical fictionalization to understand them. Especially in cases of "historical lens" and where "historical contexting" is needed. Side notes:What i find less interesting about the noah story, is the flood itself, which as I said I believe was a large regional flood, which is supported by science, that would have appeared to be the world from the ancients POV. More interesting is why God sent the flood was due to interspecies mating, briefly described as Angels and human women breeding, which goes into more detail in later bible revisions, the book of enoch. Also this is supported by science, through DNA evidence and archeology.
>>42893661> which goes into more detail in later bible revisions, the book of enoch.Grrr, i meant:which goes into more detail in later LEFT OUT OF bible revisions, the book of enoch.
>>42893584PERSONAL property, not private property
>>42893317>Why tf do religious people get a passbecause redditor types made atheism look really uncool and now the pendulum has swung back
>>42893661>christian trans womangenuinely more cucked and onions than mexicans for trump
>>42893749Lol imagine thinking Reddit made a difference
>>42893765Nope. Jesus loves trans, and all trans that accept Jesus's love are accepted into heaven. Sorry you're gay.
>>42893775this reply might be more reddit than the atheists ITT
>>42893723Sure whatever. In libertarianism theres no distinction. And in context of tolerating the intolerable, you dont need to micro define it further to solve that particular issue, was my point. Your distinction is down the road, solving of different issues. Something I do also agree with btw for those issues.
>>42893820There is a very important distinction and if you deny this you are trying to strip other people of their personal freedoms. There's no other explanation.
>>42893814Reddit is anti-christian and atheist though? Its literally why I post here. To avoid being banned and having ro make a new account every few months for not apologizing and cowtailing anything partially pro-christian.
>>42893827Okay, explain further please. Your getting vague and frothing, so im losing clarity on what your saying is so fundamental to how we can tolerate the intolerable by sub dividing the term into two distinctions, where the original term doesnt already solve the tolerance of intolerant problem. Please enlighten me :(
>>42893855Personal property is that which is personal to the specific person owning it. Private property is merely a legal distinction and includes personal and impersonal properties.
>still worshipping sandnigger jewish nonsense from 2000+ years ago
>>42893864OKAY... thanx for the definition, please answer my question.
>>42893317stop tolerating faith
>>42893875Private property does not necessarily mean that you own the property personally.
>>42893885Okay, but it can. So implications and what it solves is the same.
>>42893901So you meant to say personal property.
>>42893908No, because its not needed to solve the issue i was commenting to, not to go on a meaningless tangent with someone seething about unrelated points. Ill help you, if you want to argue against what I said, you should go off the premise of libertarianisms concept being a good base or outline, while your microdefinition arguement/tangent should have been about refining or building on top of a concept instead of trying to remove or replace.
>>42893962So you're saying you should be allowed to violate people's personal property.
>>42893971No. Im saying, according to libertarianism, personal property AND private property are the same thing (you moron).
>>42893333>atheism makes the most sense>I can't measure dark mass, can't even see it, so it makes sense that it is not real>Meanwhile in the universe: *dark mass makes up about 27% of the total mass energy of the entire universe*
>>42894008They're not the same thing, and to insist otherwise suggests that you don't believe in protection of personal property. Private property is a government-enforced law.
>>42894012so the difference between these is one has evidence and one doesn't, and if evidence came to contradict the current evidence of dark matter (not dark mass you drooling retard) we would change our working theory instead of hold to it forever
>>42893333it definitely makes the least sense lmao its not even an actual philosophy, its just most intuitive to default to it in how much pseudoscientific 'logic' empiricism is present in the modern world. yeah mainstream religion was always used for people to escape their problems but atheism isn't inherently at all exempt from any of the problems non-secular religions presented. its still empiricism.>t. agnostic
>>42894191when people say atheist they usually mean agnostic.
>>42894021> A+B=C> C = B && C ≠ AThe hell are you talking about?I never said anything about the governments laws/definitions? I said in my first comment, "libertarianism" as in the philosophy of libertarians. Proof:If someone steals my car, in many states I will be tried for homicide if I shoot/kill them.Thats antithetical to libertarianism, and protection of personal property. The reason is to libertarians property is land, items, possessions, personal or otherwise owned (private) and not everyones (public). I therefore have the right to protect my own property the same as land. If someone is allowed to shoot someone for trespassing, they should be allowed to shoot them for stealing given similar reasonable conditions like warnings and last resorts like there being no other way to stop your loss of property other than shooting them. AGAIN, this is complete tangent off what I commented on originally. So please answer my question, and enlighten me how lack of that distinction doesnt solve for tolerating intolerable people?
>>42894816So you think that killing someone is an appropriate punishment for stealing, and this is somehow a libertarian position.
>>42894088Did you get your covid19 booster? Kek.
>>42894828Yes. It's my property. Having that car may be life or death to me. The punishment for a crime should be more than the reward.
>>42894857Jesus Christ.
the flood is generally understood to be a real historical event and it's well attested to by extrabiblical sources from completely different cultures
>>42894878jesus wasn't a real person who actually existed in real life
>>42894899the majority of secular historians disagree
