What are your thoughts on the gay face hypothesis?
real
Yes, also repper face is real too
>if you like men you smile>if you like women you don'tlol. It's kinda funny but also true.
>>42981703>composite face is whitesomething tells me this is not actually representative
>>42981789what is the repper face?
>>42981975>how dare white people in a white majority country use white people in their scientific study
>>42981703the composite heterosexual looks near identical to my brother who is a pedophile(heterosexual pedophile, though)
>>42981979I'm terrible at describing things, but it looks like they are holding their breath, like when someone walked up a couple flights of stairs and is trying to hide that they are tired and they have bad physical condition, dunno.
>>42981703It's backwards.Gynephiles and androphiles are the correct groupings.Why would you group together women who like women with men who like men? They're the complete opposite.
>>42982174where do bisexual niggas fall on this?
>>42982208Probably somewhere between gynephiles and androphiles.
>>42982214bisexuals are the only normal people on the planet, got it
>>42982029lolll
>>42981703>heterosexual women are fat slampigs plappers oink oink checks out
>>42981703It’s just cuz gay men pamper themselves more and gay women pamper themselves less than their counterparts.
>>42982174Because they're both homosexual. A gay man is like a woman, while lesbians are like men.
>>42981703Cope like all the other 'proof' that being gay is biological actually.People don't want to admit that sexuality is highly socially conditioned and even to an extent a choice.
>>42982320>A gay man is like a woman, while lesbians are like mento be more specific, gay men are like straight women and lesbians are like straight menso it makes more sense to group by attraction rather than orientation
>>42982322sounds like you're the one coping
>>42982359>people are heavily influenced by their social environment>people can make choices>both of these things magically stop the moment you get to sexuality because.... BECAUSE THEY JUST DO OKAY LOOK AT THE HECKIN' DIGIT RATIOS! THE GAYFACE!sure anon I'm the one coping
>>42982394>people are influenced by their brain structure>but all the studies that show that homosexuality can be influenced by brain structure are a cope and not real, because scientists really want a biological model of homosexuality rather than a social one, for some reason
>>42982314also hard labor (and its consequences) does a number on appearance and tradie culture kinda selects against gay people
>>42982406>influenceddoing an incredible amount of heavy lifting there>for some reasonbecause activists decided to push the born this way meme so now people think that homosexuality has to be innate and biological otherwise homophobia would be justified
>>42982443>>influenced>doing an incredible amount of heavy lifting thereoh sorry let me take a stronger stanceyou are your brain structurebeing gay is innatebeing trans is innatethere is a huge amount of evidence that gay people and trans people are literally biologically real and have innate conditions as a result of their brain structures
>>42982443>implying I chose hard mode for the lulzDo you seriously think I wanted all of this? So you believe I saw all the discrimination towards people like me and decided to be like this for whatever reason? The unbearable pain these thoughts bring to me?
>>42982348What makes them unique is that they are homosexual, meaning they find themselves more attractive than the opposite sex. person should value being attractive to themselves, more than to the other sex. Trannies worship the sexual body of the other.
>>42982462>there is a huge amount of evidence that gay people and trans people are literally biologically real and have innate conditions as a result of their brain structuresthere is no evidence that one's sexuality or gender identity is innatebiological correlates do not prove that something is biologically innate, there are biological correlates to wearing a dress (being female) but that obviously isn't because there's a 'wearing a dress gene', it's because of social factorsthis is almost certainly what's going on with shit like gayface(also biology can be altered by social factors, brains aren't static)>>42982464I said there's an element of choice to it, that doesn't mean it's a straightforward 'are you gay or straight?' 'are you trans or cis?' choice like you're playing pokemon or something
>>42982519>this is almost certainly what's going on with shit like gayfaceoh so what causes gayface then?
>>42982464I believe you simply weren't satisfied with being the male was attracted to the female. You coveted the female wanted to be like her, so you could own your own sexuality.
>>42982530biology, I haven't denied that, but gayface isn't being gay in of itself, it's just having a more feminine face, and having a more feminine face correlates with being gay likely for social reasons
>>42982552>having a more feminine face correlates with being gay likely for social reasonswhy?
>>42982561a feminine face is associated with women due to the physical similarity and having sex with men is associated with women, this will effect how one is treated and how perceives oneselfdo you think there's a biological cause behind wearing dresses? because when you look at dress-wearers they mostly share a number of distinct biological features, such as XX chromosomes, high-estrogen, low-testosterone, and many more, so it must be biological right?
>>42982584>do you think there's a biological cause behind wearing dresses?it leaves the vagina open all you would have to do is lift the dress to penetrate her, wouldn't have to bother yanking off pantsit highlights the sexual vulnerability of the female
>>42982584>do you think there's a biological cause behind wearing dresseswearing dresses isn't biological, sexual attraction isI think you have a very narrow perception of gays in culture, for many decades gays were stereotyped as more masculine
>>42982594I never realized before boys thought thoughts like this
>>42982519I honestly don't know what you are talking about.>>42982532Wrong, I never had a problem with women, I just feel like this, and I know for sure that it is something obvious enough that others can see it, I tried to hide it, tried to change, nothing worked, it accomplished nothing, I just wasted my time hoping people with a similar opinion to yours was right.
>>42982610Not only boys think like that, cisw often joke about that.
>>42982616Sure, you don't have a problem with women because you're obsessed with women
>>42982594that's not a biological cause, that's a social response to biology>>42982601wearing dresses obviously has a psychological component, unless you think people's heads are completely empty when they're clothes shopping and getting dressedcross-culturally gays tend to be perceived as more feminine, and even the stereotypical masculinity associated with gays has tended to be somewhat feminised (leatherdaddies, bikers, etc are not conventionally masculine)
>>42982642>leatherdaddies, bikers, etc are not conventionally masculineno, that is conventionally masculine. Big muscular hair men in masculine roles like firefighters, cops, bikers, etc., are all very masculine
>>42982634What makes you think that?
>>42982661No, gay men into leather are not conventionally masculine. Even gay bodybuilders have a feminine interest in their bodies, similar to bimbo women
>>42982680It's so obvious if you come from a gay psychological position. If This Were a feminine board interested in women's sexual attractions that would be all these handsome male bodies, rather than all these stupid female bodies posted here everyday.
>>42982693you're just attempting to define any interest in subculture as femininethat is of course another purely socially constructed view, while sexuality is innate
>>42982713I agree it is socially constructed the only thing I think is biological is your sexual orientation. Gender identity is socially constructed.
>>42982711Wrong again, I come here to vent and browse the male appreciation threads
>>42982783That's another thing you're hung up about is to prove to other people, they are wrong and you're right
>>42982812>you lost because you repliedffs
>>42982320>>42982348That's the point. OP's image groups gay men in with lesbians which doesn't make sense.The corrected image groups gay men in with heterosexual women, which does make sense.Gay men are more like heterosexual women and heterosexual men are more like lesbians.
>>42982174They are both homo, which is what the study is about.
>>42981703It's real but it's a correlate not a guarantee. I know straight people who look like the gay side and gay people who look like the straight side.>>42982443>>42982519> le behaviour is due purely to socioeconomic factorslmao, reppers make up just 13% of the queer population but over half of the bad optics and retarded doublethink. The only people who obsess over the idea that being gay is a choice are closeted bisexuals because that argument literally wouldn't make sense unless you already have homosexual desires. You're a faggot and you need to admit it before you kill yourself or john50
>>42981703fake, the real one is much more subtle, looks like you've swapped out the real 'straight' male for some sort of fat ugly mexican
>>42981703Gay people look significantly better than straggots? No big surprise
