misandry is real
>>43122591Would, next question
>>43122597You would, but... should?
>>43122591Athletes foot
>>43122597gross, have some self respect
>>43122591What the hell is even that?
>>43122591Mogs me
>>43122591average swede
>>43122591I can see her pussy
>>43122591sissies need to be rounded up
>>43122597extreme ultra syphilis
>>43125116shut up bigot men are allowed to crossdress
>>43125134no
>>43125134"men" below the age of 35 with good genes are allowed to crossdressftfy
>>43122591>"misandry">looks inside>it's actually oppositional sexismhm
>>43125194Ugly old men are allowed to crossdress and should be encouraged to do so
>>43125218old people in general need to be ground up into fertilizer
>>43125218no
>>43122591Terf exist because of misandry. Trannies are hated because they are seen as predatory men. Hell, when my manmoding gets clocked it’s “Are you a boy or a girl” then getting laughed at is misandry since it making fun of a man to not fit the mold.
>>43125500It absolutely is misandric but the intersectionalist leftoids will never admit this, their queer-feminism-thirdworldism bonds are sacred and you can't break them
>>43125116And delivered to my bedroom
>>43125247yes
>>43125500Again this is literally oppositional sexism, not misandry.
>>43125560isn't it both?
>>43122591Yes, and I'm a misandrist.
>>43125576No. Misandry (I prefer the term androphobia, it has less baggage and is more pointed) is specifically hatred/discrimination against the archetypal man, not hatred for failing to live up to it. So, it'd be misandry/androphobia to assume someone is dangerous and hostile simply because they are a man.
>>43125558no
>>43125602>So, it'd be misandry/androphobia to assume someone is dangerous and hostile simply because they are a man.That is the fundamental premise of TERFism.You're just arguing marginal semantics for the sake of arguing, nona.
>>43125602Standards for womenhood are frequently deemed misogynistic althoughbeit however
>>43125656Contemporary TERFism isn't actually that misandrist, though. It's just transmisogynistic, as evidenced by how the "modern TERF" seems to actually love men. >>43125670They are, but it's often a misapplication. Failing to live up to expectations because the expectations themselves are belittling and you choose to opt out of them? That's traditional sexism (misogyny). Failing to live up to expectations because you are instead perceived as too masculine to be a "proper woman"? That's oppositional sexism.
>>43125694It's mainly because pro-trans twitter/tumblr were calling pretty much anyone slightly transphobic a TERF so the term became a lot about TE but not so much about RF anymore, women (and even men) who have next to nothing to do with radical feminism started identifying with it
>>43125204I never understood Serano. How is the hate against trans women explained by misogyny if much more feminine humans (cis women) are hated much less?
>>43125793It's just easier to blame AMABs for every social issue
>>43125602>the archetypal mannot everyone is a jungian, you know. jungianism is a transphobic psychology bc "healthiness" is defined by manifesting the reproductive archetypes
>>43125793It's because only a part of transmisogyny is "traditional misogyny." The hatred of femininity and women is a component of why trans women are hated, but not the full story. The oppositional sexism component makes up the difference. >>43125825Archetypal as in "what society sees as a 'real man'" not Jungian pseudoreligiosity
>>43125808please stop
how real is it?
>>43122597how would you fuck her?
