are above knee (and shorter) skirts inherently sexual clothing? it's the only piece I feel weird in wearing
>>43179832yes
>>43179832no
>>43179832maybe
>>43179832no. You're falling for chud/boomer bullshit about modesty
>>43183182think about it: it leaves the panties exposed at common angles forcing the wearer to walk and sit in a very specific way that just so happens to show off their ass and legsit makes your ass and hips biggerit maximizes showing off legs it's hyper feminine
>>43183471Very female brained post. Good girl
>>43183471fuck you mean 'common angles'? An upskirt is not a common angle. And with a skirt length like the op picture, even bent over you won’t see anything. It doesn’t show off your butt unless you wear a miniskirt. Neither does it make your ass bigger if you don’t have one. It'll just fall straight down.Men used to wear them and some cultures still do. You are just acting like a malebrained male gaze retard>>43183484no it isn’t. One male gaze reinforcing another
>>43183572sitting down with your legs even slightly open is a common angle. they're also literally designed to make hips seem bigger that's their point. and men wore skirts in the past that were an entirely different design and way below the knee. never has it been acceptable for a man to wear a skirt-like clothing that's as long as the op pic and especially not half as long as it. plus ONLY women have work miniskirts
>>43179832only rapey men think this
