Even a single instance of anti-trans speech should be punished by 10 years’ hard labour.
I unironically believe this but for all kinds of hate speech not just transphobia
men cannot become women, gender cannot be changed
>>43235767Agree.>>4323577310 years gulag.
>>43235757This is true but aggravated transphobia should be an instant life sentence to hard labor in dangerous mines.For example, >>43235773 knowingly posted this in response to us, trans people, while being warned of the consequences. Aggravated anti-trans speech. Life sentence in dark, dirty, stinky, claustrophobic, dangerous mines with sadistic overseers.
>>43236098Endorsed.
>>43235757can i as a trans person be permitted to post anti-trans speech
>>43235773Youre not human, metely a worthless slave that belongs in mines
>>43236159Absolutely not. To the mines with you.Incidentally, I would also send transmedicalists to the mines.
>>43235757do i get benefits for pro trans speech or is it just the bare minimum
>>43236235If I ruled society, *all* anti-trans speakers would be removed from society, so there wouldn’t be a need for pro-trans speech in the first place. But to answer your question, no, you wouldn’t be rewarded for it.
If you don't say I'm pretty on a daily basis you will be sent to re-education camps
What is anti-trans speech? Is saying you need to go on HRT to be real trans considered hate speech against transes? Why or why not?
>>43235757You'd have whole families trapped in generational debt
>>43236779By “anti-trans speech” I mean any speech that expresses ill will towards trans people as a group (so, expressing ill will towards your annoying coworker who happens to be trans wouldn’t count) or expresses a desire that trans people be harmed or mistreated or that their rights or freedoms be denied. Simply stating the actual definition of an adjective would not be considered “anti-trans speech” in my authoritarian regime.
>>43236841or speech that expresses ill will toward an individual tranny *on the basis of her being trans*
