gay men - evilstraight men - goodtransbians - evil straight trans women - goodwhy are gay men evil and straight trans women good if they both are only attracted to men?
>>43302418just look at how people talk, so many people here and outside of here believe that women can only like men, and men can only like women YOU are the brainlet if you deny how pervasive heteronormative thought is
>>43302386Just move on
>>43302471I can't
>>43302386>gay men - good>straight men - evil>transbians(straight men) - evil >straight trans women(gay men) - good >I think it's pretty obvious why.
>>43303094no, explain it
>>43302386Wouldn't the straight trans woman be bad because she's trans and that's like being gay x2?
>>43305349Are women gay for liking men?
>>43302386People are *really* fucking insecure about male butts.Love the vagina: Good.Love the penis: Good.Love women butts: Good. Love men butts: Evil.I'm evil all the way.
>>43305372No, but being trans was medically considered "gay evolved". So it would fit the pattern of gay men + straight trans women + transbians = evil but straight (cis?) men = good
>>43305255Women determine who's good and evil, being the victim gender. Gay men are not evil because they ontologically can't be victims, hence it's victimless sex. Lesbians are not evil because they're both victims, so nobody is to blame. Transbians are evil because they're straight men. Straight men are evil because women are victims and men are rapists. It's very simple. Just assume most women are transphobic and misandrist and it makes sense.For:>gay men - evil >straight men - good >transbians - evil >straight trans women - good Obviously it's homophobia. It's just that that's not usually how this goes.
>>43305496>Gay men are not evil because they ontologically can't be victims???gay men are widely seen as evil doegay men are seen as predators see: alan turing
>>43305496The character design in this image sure is something
>>43305528Yes, in the past. But Turing lived before the civil rights stuff. People's ideologies changed since 1954 when Alan turing died. Homosexuality used to be as taboo as pedophilia. Picrel is how much has changed even in the last 15 years. Give me a famous homosexual who was discriminated against by the mainstream explicitly for being gay in the United States rather than Pakastan that came after the civil rights movement.
>>43305644>people forgot they could use you being gay against youum no, I wish
>>43305676>um no, I wishMaybe you're old. Being gay is yaoi irl and thus makes you pretty cool in women's eyes. As long as you're on the left side of politics, so the majority, being gay is good and makes you trustworthy somehow.
>>43305828nothing has changed except lying words
>>43302386Remove the T is now the default position for straight cis people and lgb.
>>43306068based
>>43306045Nothing has changed. Not socially? Not even the law?Meanwhile I'm a zoomer and I'm considering having gay sex just so that I don't have to die a virgin and can put on my job resumes that I'm gay.The only thing stopping me is the risk of STDs and that it's difficult to find a gay man who wants to be monogomous with me and isn't an incubus, and that I haven't lost hope in women who aren't assholes existing enough yet to count them out.My family would be 100% okay with it. My workplace would be more than okay with it(I asked). The world I grew up in is not the same one you grew up in, and the world you grew up in definitely wasn't the same one Turing grew up in.If I was a boytoy slut, I'd fuck you personally with your consent just to prove a point.
>>43306636the law has changed and that doesn't change social conditionspeople are a bit quieter about their homophobia, but fundamentally how they treat gays as monsters and shun them hasn't
>>43306654>people are a bit quieter about their homophobia, but fundamentally how they treat gays as monsters and shun them hasn'tLeast where I live, we don't shun gays. >the law has changed and that doesn't change social conditions No. The social conditions changed years after the laws changed. Maybe your generation is still homophobic or you live in a rightwing state. Idk. >people are a bit quieter about their homophobia, but fundamentally how they treat gays as monsters and shun them hasn'tI mean, that's just how most men who don't fit patriarchal roles are treated. The gay cause kind of got in the way of the gender equality one. Homophobia has always functionally been misandry by another name. Lesbians didn't recieve nearly as poor treatment.
>>43307329you aren't gay, how would you know?
>>43307338>you aren't gay, how would you know?I'm bisexual, so I am gay. I'm just also inexperienced, because I've not had much success or much drive to go get STDs. I know that whenever I disagree with a bimbo feminist, the more common type of feminism encountered in the wild, she calls me a fag in order to attack my masculinity and police the gender role I'm allowed to exist in. It's always the same insults as conservatives. I'm just fag. I'm just an incel chud. I just never had a gf and never will. I just am a loser, failed wannabe rapist of a man who just wants to oggle women and fuck little boys and I deserve any misfortune befalls me. Ect ect. That's what they say. Whatever possible to pathologize me and attack my character in order to not think about what I have to say about misandry. You can't seriously tell me you haven't felt the whole being a failure of a man aspect of homophobia. I was terrified of dissapointing my father before I asked him if it would be alright if I found out I was gay. It's all stupid. Masculinity is only acceptable of you're the spitting image of a 60s man. That much hasn't changed.
