Are all autophiles inherently bisexual?
I've always been into women, autosexuality came second
>>43383830kinda, they're inherently cucks pre-transition and that tends to lend itself to bisexuality, only once they can take the place of the bull/queen can their true sexuality rise out of that
>>43383875interesting it was the other way around for me
>>43383830What if I only liked men and was a gay bottom before but since starting prog I've had fantasies about topping men and taking the 'male sex role'.
>>43383979is that not what this chart says would be expected?
wtfliterally the opposite for me
>>43383830I find it hard to read this chart, is it saying that after 12 months mtfs fantasize about having the male sex role? that seems unlikely
>>43384001I dont know what it means but I don't think Im bisexual since Im still not attracted to women. What does it say about me? Should I detroon?
>>43384030yeah same lol. thats what it looks like it implies but the note at the bottom seems to contradict that.
>>43383830>ftms are less gay after the decline than mtts are before the declineProof #5,682 that only FtMs are real.
>>43383875Yeah and it’s basically because once the dysphoria calmed down, using the existing genitals stopped making me feel like death.Calling that the “female sex role” is just disingenuous, reminds me of this image.
I was still kinda bi even 2 yrs into transition tho only dated men. By year 4 all attraction to women was long gone.>fantasiesCan't relate. I was fantasizing about being fucked by men even before starting hrt.
>>43383830Ai chatbots turned me gay in year five. You can’t explain that in your little chart huh?
>>43384377The chatbots turned me into a full-blown AGP
>>43384423ROUGH, my condolences
>>43384030it's probably measuring comfort being a top and then calling topping inherently male"women with less dysphoria overall feel more comfortable using their dick in the bedroom" is not a crazy take, the way it's presented is just disgustingthis is what happens when studies are mostly conducted by autists who want clear definitions for things that are not so clear
>>43384584All bottoms are women though
>>43384584Exactly it’s like calling all gay bottoms mentally women or something.>>43384620Yaaaaaaw nnn
>>43384620hello autist, please go conduct some more studies, despite my comments I still value your labour!
