It's always the straight cis guys doing shit like "semen retention" or "nofap". like do what you need to, but I never see any gay men (or any queers) have a significant enough problem with porn addictions.in fact, gays EMBRACE cock. a porn addiction to them isn't even considered an addiction to them. Just curious why straights seem so fucking sexually miserable, yet most lgbt (with obvious exceptions) love cock, sex, gooning, etc.>inb4 "YOU JUST ADMITTED THAT ALL QUEERS ARE PORN ADDI-"Trying to have a conversation about sexuality and sex isn't me saying we all have a porn addiction, I'm literally just fucking trying to have a discussion you stupid puritan christcuck.
>>43386601Because theyre stupid people who get their minds so rotted by porn that they can’t find any women that isn’t naked attractive so they just cut out of their life or try to at least doesn’t really help tho a lot of straight men have a lot of hang ups about porn since its very convenient nowadays
>>43386601Porns bad for you.
internalized heterophobia
>>43386601Gay men get irl sexHetero men don't get sexHetero men get addicted to porn and deathgrip themselves so that they have erectile dysfuntion at 20 years old
>>43386601I don't even know why people think porn addiction is a real thing. You jorkin' it to whatever you like every night before you go to bed isn't addiction. Unless you're doing it 5+ times a day then you ain't addicted, simple.
>>43386601im gay and have a porn addiction lmao. im dealing with ed right now
>>43386663Its addiction. If you cannot masturabate with just your fantasies, something is wrong with you.
>>43386677Get a pocket pussy and only use your imagination.
>>43386625anything is bad if not used in moderation. as a nsfw artist, I love "porn addicts" because they actually pay well and aren't ashamed. (mostly)>>43386677Moderate your usage better. Don't completely quit, but try other things that feel just as good as stroking your rock hard veiny, lubed up cock.>>43386663I agree somewhat, but again anything can be an addiction. >>43386638well maybe if straight men weren't so trash, women would fuck them lol>>43386635I don't think that's real.>>43386684both is good.
>>43386663T. Schlomo Goldstein
>>43386706>I don't think that's real.I don't see why notmale sexuality is maligned in both right wing and left wing communities. It's predicable that young men might feel as though their natural sexual urges are immoral or otherwise wrong given the messaging
>>43386601Cis straight man here.>why are straggots obsessed with "porn addiction"?Because it exists and affects a lot of men, to various degrees. In most cases the addiction is not severe and thus is not an obstacle for the man to perform (and I don't mean just sexually but in general). The rare severe cases of porn addiction do require a healing process since they can involve porn induced ED and a general loss of interest in real sex.>but I never see any gay men (or any queers) have a significant enough problem with porn addictions.I'll make it simple:Getting laid consistently (without paying hookers) for MOST straight men requires having and keeping your shit together because cis women have much higher standards than transgirls, and INFINITELY higher standards than gay men.A gay man could suffer severe porn addiction and still have no problem whatsoever getting dick.That said, porn addiction is seldom severe so it's mostly used as a scapegoat/the attibuted cause of other people men face.
>>43386761E.g. A straight man with severe porn addiction likely struggles in other areas of life because he wastes too much TIME and ENERGY looking at porn.And because he can also find partial sexual satisfaction with porn with very little effort, he has very little INCENTIVE to go out and meet women IRL, which reinforces his addiction.
>>43386761gay men with porn addiction are rarer because gay men are rarer
>>43386761>Getting laid consistently (without paying hookers) for MOST straight men requires having and keeping your shit together because cis women have much higher standards than transgirls, and INFINITELY higher standards than gay men.You make a good case on why foids aren't worth the bother.
>>43386777True. That said, a straight man needs to perform to a higher degree and jump through a lot more hoops than a gay man in order to get laid.According to recent studies near a THIRD of young straight men are not getting laid, which means millions of men being sexless for long periods of time. No wonder it gets talked a lot.
>>43386792I like cis women in spite of the bullshit they can cause, but as a straight man I can say I envy bisexuals.
>>43386831And yes, I am aware gay and bi men face a lot of problems that straight men don't. But from my point of view I think bisexual tops have it better.
>>43386761>Cis straight man hereYou are not straight so stop larping, doubt you are cis eitherYou are on lgbt board
>>43386792Women are naturally picky cause every intercourse can result in a baby and total ruin and/or possibly death of their bodies
>>43386923I am, but believe what you want.
>>43386842Bisexual men are sexually repulsive>t.woman
>>43386933Why are you here then? Are you one of those "straight men" with severe cock lust? Cause thats not what hetero means
>>43386945To try to better understand LGBT people in an enviroment that allows true honesty (an anonymous imageboard) and sometimes offer my point of view so they can use that information to better understand cis straight men as well.
>>43386967P.S. And also because I've been in 4chan for years so I can sympathize with other anons more than random normies on other websites.
>>43386974Also, I believe discrimination from straight to gay, bi, trans and nb people happens mostly due to ignorance and negative biases (caused mainly by some religions), and while I don't consider myself a progressive I'd prefer if such discrimination ceased to exist.
>>43387025Do you think young females with a vagina are gay men if they say so?
>>43386931This is not 1226. Men are naturally gigahorny but somehow that doesn't come with the obligation of foids to put out.Stop excusing foids' despicable behavior.>>43386934Women are sexually repulsive. The only reason some men put up with it is for reproduction. Artificial wombs can't come fast enough.
>>43387047I think gender is a category invented by humans (which is also a category) made to segregate people into certain roles. Which is why gender expectations refer to certain attributes and behaviors that aren't limited to being a human of a certain sex.To put it in simple words: I think genders were invented to organize society in a way that maximizes that society's chances of survival and reproduction. And considering that for most of human history we didn't have guns or industrial machines that could outproduce human hands, it makes sense from an historical point of view that the genders were created like they were.E.g. Human females are objectively more important for reproduction, and they're also more fragile and generally less physically strong than human males, so the gender "woman" was invented and its assigned roles were historically related to family building, crafting, hunting small animals and picking fruit. While human males were better suitted for dangerous (because we're more expendable when it comes to the survival of the species) and physical strength related tasks so the gender "man" was created and its assigned role revolves around many things but specially about hunting and protecting your family/tribe.In modern times we no longer need human physical strength for the survival of the species nearly as much, and human females can perform most tasks and jobs men can, so the traditional requisite/attribute of gender being associated to a human's sex is no longer necessary IMO. Thus trans people exist.Religions don't like this point of view because they're based on dogmas and the continuation of tradition and a strict social order instead of personal freedom and self-determination. However, as scientific advancements continue to dispel many of those dogmas, religions are gradually forced to adapt and change their tune on this among other topics.
>>43387047>>43387116>Do you think young females with a vagina are gay men if they say so?P.S. Yes.
I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids
>>43386601I don't really get it either. I just see jerking off as part of being alive. It's neither good nor bad.
>>43386601Porn can be banned for all I care.
>>43387116P.S. 2 Also the historical condemnation of gay people by most religions was IMO due to the need to maximize the amount of new soldiers and manual workers, which requires the maximization of birthrates.Up until WW2 and the invention of the nuclear bomb, wars between countries happened with a much higher frequency and with a proportionally a lot more human losses than now.Considering this, it makes sense homosexuality was seen as highly undersirable back then because new soldiers (and workers) were desperately needed not just for the expansion of a nation but also its survival. We also need to take into account that child mortality rates were way higher than now even in developed (for their time) nations, so maximizing birthrates was a priority for all countries in the past.Now with modern military technology and nukes wars are no longer of the scale of the wars of the past, and they're usually confined to remote areas away from most western countries. Thus more countries have become and are becoming more tolerant and accepting of gay people.
>>43387266Nice theory nerd but warfare historically didn't typically feature huge human death tolls and often didn't involve or majorly effect the overwhelming majority of "citizenry", where it did it was most often in the form of excess taxation and the potential that cause for starvation. The huge death tolls was a product of modern warfare, essentially from the Napoleonic wars until the close of WW2.
>>43387108>Artificial wombs can't come fast enough.I cannot wait for mass produced gay babies who have aesthma, epilepsy and cancer who are incubated in an empty void.You could also adopt or use surrogate slavery but bi men won't do that cause dating women who hate them is too important to them.Hihi >_<
>>43387108>Men are naturally gigahorny but somehow that doesn't come with the obligation of foids to put out.>Stop excusing foids' despicable behavior.Not wanting to fuck you is not despicable. Fuck men if you need to bust a nut so badly? Women are based for having standards
>>43387370>use surrogate slaveryAlready did. But it's not a feasible option for most men.Artificial wombs would be a huge breakthrough to finally rid civilization of foid privilege.
>>43387378Women are never based.>Fuck men if you need to bust a nut so badlyOf course. The best thing that happened to me was to be a faggot. Very much unironically.
>>43387116Would you come out as gay man for your young female gay man partner that you loved cause he was tiny and he has amazing tits and a pussy?
>>43387379Human incubation will just become a rich luxery thing while low iq workers will be mass produced in factories.I think it will raise female value even more and I look forward to that.
>>43387385Good that you fuck men as its beneath women to do so. Maybe men could try to be more sexy or something if they want to be desired by something else but a fag
>>43387385Get a load of Gaydrew Tate over here. If you love being a fag so much why do you start slobbering when a women is mentioned?
>>43386601>admit to myself after 28 years that i like guys more than i should afterall>eventually talk to chud friend about that>tells me to stop watching porn>mfw i almost never watch porn>mfw i have no face
>>43386663>oyy vey goyim. there is nothing wrong with porn, just watch it goyim
>>43387512Your friend is a coping closeted gay man. I'm sorry, hope you have better friends
