/lgbt/ - Theory: Trans tops are gynophilic, Trans bottoms a - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender

Anonymous

04/30/26(Thu)15:52:54 No.43424933

File: 1776581403890706s.jpg (7 KB, 237x250)

7 KB JPG

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)15:52:54 No.43424933 Archived

Theory: Trans tops are gynophilic, Trans bottoms are androphilic.

Am I wrong?

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)15:55:52 No.43424953

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)15:55:52 No.43424953

excludes bottom transbians and straight mtf tops. take that typology back to the workshop and sawzall the foreskin off it bucko

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)15:59:23 No.43424992

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)15:59:23 No.43424992

>>43424953
Bottom Transbians are androphilic cmon now, they basically treat their clocky tops like boyfriends after they've been together awhile

BlackKnight
04/30/26(Thu)16:00:19 No.43425003

BlackKnight 04/30/26(Thu)16:00:19 No.43425003

>>43424933
>gynophilic, androphilic.
Why not use words that normies don't have to look up on the fly?

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:03:03 No.43425023

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:03:03 No.43425023

>>43425003
if you have to look those words up and are above the age of 14 you should probably be sterilized via chemical castration anyway

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:04:33 No.43425029

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:04:33 No.43425029

>>43424933
do you know what meta attraction is? how trans bottoms are getting turned on not by their partner but by the idea of them being put in a position that affirms theirs sense of self as a woman

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:13:09 No.43425117

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:13:09 No.43425117

>>43425029
Is there actually any evidence that supports meta-attraction or is it just a convenient theory

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:16:01 No.43425151

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:16:01 No.43425151

>>43425029
>not by their partner but
why would they be with a partner they're not attracted to? seems stupid.

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:16:47 No.43425159

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:16:47 No.43425159

>>43425151
desperation

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:19:27 No.43425182

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:19:27 No.43425182

>>43425117
who would it be convenient for? transphobes? because if so, many trans women talk about being like this. You'd have to believe they're telling convenient lies for their own self image for some reason.

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)16:38:43 No.43425339

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)16:38:43 No.43425339

>>43424933
the opposite trans who tops are androphilic because of the gay male sexuality

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)17:22:29 No.43425664

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)17:22:29 No.43425664

>>43425182
self loathing and pickme trannies, it is very convenient for them, thats why theyre the main people who use it

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)17:23:54 No.43425673

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)17:23:54 No.43425673

>>43424933
gynephilic with an E

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)17:25:53 No.43425687

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)17:25:53 No.43425687

>>43425029
>meta attraction
Opinion discarded

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)17:29:17 No.43425714

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)17:29:17 No.43425714

>>43425029
do you know what meta attraction is? how cis tops are getting turned on not by their partner but by the idea of them being put in a position that affirms theirs sense of self as a man

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)19:38:27 No.43426909

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)19:38:27 No.43426909

>>43425714
now youre getting it. cis or trans, sex is just about affirming our gender identities

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)20:26:48 No.43427256

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)20:26:48 No.43427256

>>43424933
I'm bottom and bi,
so...

Anonymous
04/30/26(Thu)23:51:06 No.43428839

Anonymous 04/30/26(Thu)23:51:06 No.43428839

>>43426909
have you never been attracted to someone?