>>43458480
its already too far gone to fix

stop tolerating faith

>>43458596
>just optics nuke even more
That doesn't seem especially helpful.

>>43458480
>>43458480
Serious question though why shouldn't people be allowed to use surrogates?

>>43458684
Because the gays then rape the baby to death and it becomes national news literally.

>>43458741
So should straights be allowed surrogates?

>>43458741
gay guy here
i'd only want to adopt/surrogate a boy since I hate women,not because I'd want to diddle him

fucking gay diddlers are ruining it for me

>>43458480
only Christians believe in demons, retard

>>43459304
Demons are real, and you don’t have to be a Christian to see that. I’ve experienced them myself.

>>43458846
Surrogacy is fucked up
Imagine taking a baby away from the woman who carried it
Nobody should be a surrogate

you can't
it's not some kind of organic explosion of lolcows crawling out of the woodwork
this kind of focus is intentional and unevenly weighted on the platforms we use to participate in social systems. Everything from college news papers to literally every single social platform worth talking about is owned and run by someone with a dogmatic opposition to anyone that isn't "normal"
It's profitable, artificially popular, and cathartic in the most adolescent and vindictive way to make these people into five minute anti-celebrities, it's not going to stop until people are either too exhausted to give a shit or fairly considered by the godkings of our ethereal satellite states

>>43458480
Actively call out and disavow gross evil freaks instead of meekly whining about how the no hrt violent sociopath getting egged on by rightoids into doing something evil actually goes by she/her

>>43458480

None of these but the first 3 are even issues.

Surrogacy has been going on for a long time though.

Meanwhile we give billions in our tax money to a narcissistic tyrant's vanity ballroom and war, and nobody blinks an eye

>>43459425

Now do Republican Congressmen Matt Gaetz, and Mike Johnson, both who "adopted" underage guys for purposes unknown?

>>43459321
let me guess you have a scar where it attacked you?

By creating a news company our selves and finding news so salacious about cis people that trans nonsense bores people.

Remember, there are A LOT more cis people than trans people. And people HUNGER for content constantly, the disgusting exploitative media apparatus has ensured this is the case.

The only trick to it is that it would be incredibly easy for cis billionaires who know what the fuck they are doing to infiltrate the corporate structure of such an enterprise and destroy it. If this company becomes a corporation, those guys will definitely destroy it. They will invest in the company, and the company will accept it because it's "good business sense" and slowly they will take it over and choose a CEO who under the guise of inclusiveness will start to cover POSITIVE trans stories, then over time they will shift to negative ones, "because it sells". And then the company will become exactly like all the original media companies.