I often wonder if male boy bands were truly ever about the music, or were actually about the repressed homosexuality of the producers creating and financing them. Many boy band members have alluded to sexual misconduct by their backers, but none, to my knowledge, have been very specific, so I think it really was about closeted older bi/gay men finding young trade and obviously since prostitution is frowned upon, you teach them how to dance, and boom now it's legal but really they were all expected to sexually service older dudes, I mean how otherwise do you explain the 2nd from left ugly guy? He must have had a mouth like a hoover.
>>43460571even if the producers weren't explicitely gay I think your claim still hits the mark. like, powerful older guys employing younger guys to act in costume...there's some voodoo going in.
What's the difference between a band and a boyband?
>>43460571do you ever fantasize about one of these sexually exploited dancers with mouth like hoover, anon. be honest now.Pic sort of rel
>>43460571....repressed? you think fags aren't in California music and fashion???? LOL
>>43462608One is assembled based on musical skill.The other is assembled based on sex appeal and marketability.
>>43460571>male boy bandsAs opposed to female boy bands
>>43460571I asked perplexity who these are and it says british boy band blue.
>>43460571not sure what the producer saw in 3/5 of those guys who aren't atrractiveJustin and JC would have been my buttslaves
