It's ok to be attracted to men as a man.
Ok thankies
>>43581280it's ok to be attracted to men as a trans woman ^w^
source?
>>43581288the akashic records
This was a wholesome thread for less than a minute. Nothing can be male / male love on lgbt, every space has to have some fake lore added
>>43581280No that's gross
>>43581328explain why you feel that way
>>43581353Just the way it is.
>>43581379not an answer
>>43581353Because the gays ruin our optics
>>43581398Caring about optics is the most faggot shit I've ever heard. Why not put on a dress and some heels if that's what """optics""" say?
>>43581407Stfu gay, we need to drop the LG
>>43581398Do you think non-gays would accept gays if gays all wear suits and barely had sex?
>>43581425I'm not interested in engaging with your hypothetical gay. Drop the LG now.
>>43581397It is an answer you just don't like it.
>>43581379>I feel like that becaue I feel like it.That's a logical fallacy.
>>43581456there's a reasoning behind it, you weren't born hating gays
>>43581468It's because of the innate brain structure. Better?>>43581469>Pattern of behavior found in all human cultures throughout documented space and time>not inborn
>>43581512I don't get what you are trying to say. Brain structure?
>>43581517Genetics ma'am
>>43581280You will be forcefemmed.
>>43581532Based
>>43581532https://youtu.be/0HL-N9oOjcs
>>43581512>No proof>only baseless claims>"better???"uh...no.
>>43581532they're not gonna trans usthey're not gonna trans usthey're not gonna trans us
>>43581544>Goal post shifting.
>>43581566>He doesn't know what "goalpost shifting is"No, kid. Asking you to prove your own claims true isn't moving any goalposts.This literacy rate is so low it's unreal...
>>43581575>Asking you to prove your own claims true isn't moving any goalposts.It is when that wasn't what you complained about first which is what I asked "better?" in response to >>43581468 Not my literacy problem you can't keep track of your own writings.
>>43581601>Doubles down on a logical fallacyYou really think that'a a good idea? To try and win with a conceit?
>>43581616Now you're just making stuff up
>>43581628So what's your answer? Are you gonna defend your logical fallacy or not?
its not about winning or losingits weird nobody can explain why they hate gays
>>43581637There's no logical fallacy.
>>43581280but doesn't that make you a faggot?
>>43581642see>>43581468
>>43581653problem?Are loud dominant gay flamers not beloved?
>>43581654Yea things can have an innate nature without external cause that's not a fallacy.
>>43581666You need to demonstrate that's true before I can accept it.Why won't you do it?
>>43581676I already pointed to the historical record >>43581512 in the very post you accused me of not providing any basis.
>>43581699That's a claim with no sources. We call that a "baseless claim".Baseless claims are not proof of anything.Supply verifiable evidence that proves you right, or admit you can't.
being gay is innate
>>43581713The basis is empirical reality. It is verifiable because it is falsifiable if you know of a counter example you could just cite it.
>>43581718Yes both homosexuality and homophobia is innate. Both can be repressed to some extend.
>>43581730>No verifiable sources>againThanks for admitting you couldn't do it.I accept your concession.
>>43581738>Work for me for free or you can't do it. yea no thanks.
>>43581746Thanks for confirming you aren't willing to prove your own claims true.That's literally you ceding the point, so I win by your own admission.
>>43581737homophobia is learned
>>43581756>All schooling and mass media for the last 40+ years: Gays rock don't be a bigotYea sure. >>43581752>I won by my imaginary debate rulesCool reality stays the same.
>>43581412Stop trying to use us as a human shield, tranny
>>43581775my experience with school was basically being treated like a villain for being gay while everyone pretended to not hate gays and theoretically were leftist democrats, it was very strangethey clearly wanted gay men to be submissive and I wasn't willing to do that when I was submissive people magically became much nicer, it really taught me a lot about human natureI didn't talk to any other gay boys my own age, there was one flamer in another grade but we weren't close, and I didn't know any gay adults. Gayness was rarely talked about or mentioned outside a few cursory mentions in middle school sex-ed.
>>43581775You lost by your own admission.Stop crying. It's not my fault you conceded the argument.
>>43581794I don't care about your imaginary debate club rules.
>>43581280Dass rite op
>>43581815>"I DON'T CARE!!!!!!!!"Then stop replying.
>>43581829No u
>>43581815I was really bored in high school and there was a debate club and it was something that seemed like it used to exist but was neglected, like they had a table at the activities fair (small private school mind you), but there were no actual faculty sponsorsso i just downloaded the rules for parliamentary debate from the internet (this WAS the early 2000s) printed it out and we just made it up on the spot but trying to keep roughly to the basic rules, with absolutely no adult supervision, we made it to like maybe 3 actual competitive debates in 4 years but I was the president of the club and it was fun we would get food and stay after school for a few hoursmostly just informal debates picking a new topic every week but kids from all high school grades joinedprobably my proudest achievement cuz it wouldn't have existed without meat no point did we talk about logical fallacies or get wrapped up in rules or nerdy shit other than to keep the topic going
>>43581833reply again, this'll be fun.
>>43581847>at no point did we talk about logical fallacies or get wrapped up in rulesIsn't that just because there was no moderator, like you admitted?Of course nobody enforced the rules if no-one was there to enforce them.
