Is it possible to make pornography about or featuring trans people without it being fetishized? Can't it just be a woman* getting tied up or spanked or whatever it is you're into, or a man* getting railed? Why does it always have to be weird?
>>43640362Because the majority of all pornography is directed at straight, cis men. It caters to the male gaze. That is the "fetishization" you are detecting.You are gonna have to look for... amateur sources and written smut to find trans porn for, well, womenMan I should have known that liking HDG as a "cis man" was a sign. How could I have been so fucking blind...
>>43640373Tranny porn (both kinds) is bisexual, its for straights
>>43640373I do prefer stories to videos typically, but even there its mostly the same old sissy humiliation stuff. I'm very into humiliation as a matter of fact, but I've been bored of the frilly panties and sph for years now. Can't they just be normal about a trans woman getting stripped? You don't have to ignore the dick, but the rest of her body is also exposed...
>>43640405No, no, the sissy shit is still for straight men, or worse, straight trans womenYou're gonna have to look on AO3. I think most t4t lesbian stuff is also pretty reasonably intended for, well, us. I think many cis women would also be into it if they ever saw it. There is a lot they could like about the arrangement.
>>43640415Any authors you'd recommend?
>>43640362>pornography>without being fetishized?But isn't everything fetishized in porn regardless?
>>43640362i think it's possible. i try to make it myself (not that i am very financially successful, in no small part because I try to avoid the pandering via transphobic objectification, i know it would be a lot easier to make money if i didn't prioritize authenticity over chaserbait. but also im a 6, maybe 7/10 on a good day and also a cripple so there's additional limitations there lol). i think it's easier to find true depictions if you skip the studio porn and go indie (and particularly smaller creators, as the highbies usually are such because they lean into chaserbait more) which is easier than ever, the porn industry is still very flawed but it has improved in allowing those who self produce find an audience. to a degree I do allow chasers to enjoy me because they do have the most disposable income (i cannot fully avoid the boypussy or hairy girl chasers when they're paying for my food and housing) but i intend to please other trans people first and foremost. and I think, if you put your money where your wants are (though I recognize your income is likely limited compared to the cis man whose demographic's money predominantly drives the industry), the 'trans, without the transphobic objectification' subcategory can expand in a direction you enjoy just a little more. order that custom video, tip them for doing a kink you love, comment on their promo posts, buy the item on their wishlist you'd want them to use. there are creators who will make the videos you want out there. they might just not be on the first few pages of tube site searches
>>43640476there can be objectification without a root in transphobia... when I model (both erotic on film and strictly artistic in person), I am objectified. my body serves a purpose, which in this case is not washing dishes or checking out purchases or delivering food, it is to be taken in slices to video or paper. that purpose can be sexually gratifying to the "consumer", ie a fetishization of a kind. but is that inherently about me being a tranny, rather than being like any other person simply with a certain variation of physical characteristics? is the rest of me extrapolated from an Otherness? not necessarily. pornography can include trans people without them being that Other, without having to slot them by default into the designated role of dickgirl or cuntboy and/or degendered androgyne or slightly quirky variation of a cissexual role. there can be neopussy, phallocock, trans people with nullification or penile preserving vaginoplasty or phalloplasty without vaginectomy, trans women bottoming for cis women, trans men topping cis men, masc tgirls, feminine trans guys who don't shave, trans girls who don't shave, trans girls who wear strapons, trans guys who bottom only with anal, nonbinary people who do not take on the role of one side of the binary, trans people Doing the kink instead of Being the kink by virtue of their transness. unfortunately, it's all part of an industry, and like most, it collectively prioritizes the narratives and personas that cis men (and then secondarily, cis women) pay for, because demand incentivizes production........ but change can happen, and I have hope there can be room made for trans porn that no longer is confined to transness being a fetish any more other characteristics a person might have. trans porn for trans people to see themselves in and not just for cis people to consume an Other
>>43640696>>43640844thank u for these well thought out posts, people here cannot read but i appreciate
>>43640362What's weird about most tranny porn other than it featuring trannies?
>>43640362trannies jerk off and smash their balls to bnwo so i dont trust them
>>43642387its not all trannies though.. right?
>>43640844I love you baby but I'm not reading all this unless you use paragraphs>inb4 READ!!1I'd love to but this ish is so painful to look at
Rodrigo Amor he seems to treat the people he does content with very nicely and treats trans girls the same as cis girls
>>43643189BBC Sissy <3
>>43643446>Kind cuban man>BBC Sissy!!!Race obsessed
